NoCalMike 0 Report post Posted March 16, 2007 Both Money in the Bank matches were good, which is asking a lot of WWE lately. The concept of MITB is good. The concept that the winner can cash in his oppurtunity at anytime is also a cool concept. My main problem with it this year are guys like Orton and Edge being in it, when they regularly get title shots or at least are involved in the title picture all the time already. IMO, the MITB match should be used to get the best and most over mid-carders over to that next level, with the winner getting the rub, while the rest also are elevated in the eyes of the fans. The problem with the roster this year is you have Edge & Orton who are all over RAW's Main Event to begin with, mixed in with a bunch of other guys who merely fill air-time. I'd say this years match has the least intrigue of the three because of the probability of the outcome. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mecca 0 Report post Posted March 16, 2007 I think Orton and Edge are both going to end up out of the match facing each other.....I think that's why there's the extra 2 and it's a much easier way to preserve Edge's mania streak. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kawalimus 0 Report post Posted March 16, 2007 It can be a legitimate annual event for sure, but they definitely need to change the gimmick a bit. Have a different sort of gimmick for it every year and I'll be fine with it. Some of these guys should surely be in some sort of match, though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Si82 0 Report post Posted March 16, 2007 I think Orton and Edge are both going to end up out of the match facing each other.....I think that's why there's the extra 2 and it's a much easier way to preserve Edge's mania streak. Why would WWE be so concerned with Edge's streak? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
foleyfanforever88 0 Report post Posted March 16, 2007 I think Orton and Edge are both going to end up out of the match facing each other.....I think that's why there's the extra 2 and it's a much easier way to preserve Edge's mania streak. If they took Orton and Edge out, that would make it one guy from each Raw and ECW and four from Smackdown. I don't think they would do that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mecca 0 Report post Posted March 16, 2007 I think Orton and Edge are both going to end up out of the match facing each other.....I think that's why there's the extra 2 and it's a much easier way to preserve Edge's mania streak. Why would WWE be so concerned with Edge's streak? Because there is a money match with it? Just blowing it for no reason would be very stupid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EVIL~! alkeiper 0 Report post Posted March 16, 2007 I think they should end the streak. The only way to make something of it is to either let it ride 8-10 more years, or book Undertaker/Edge. If they keep running it they could end up booking themselves into a corner. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mecca 0 Report post Posted March 16, 2007 I think they should end the streak. The only way to make something of it is to either let it ride 8-10 more years, or book Undertaker/Edge. If they keep running it they could end up booking themselves into a corner. Taker Edge would basically be where I'd go with it.......but then you have to ask Taker to job and well.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
