Why? I mean, really. That's DONE.
Just because it hasn't been for the title, unless I'm just forgetting something. They have history, and they could say that this is the end, once and for all (and hopefully mean it). I'm not talking something long like their last deal, just a little something to blow time for a while when Booker and Benoit needs a feud. It could be the pre-Mania deal like they do.
Someone said Batista loses and is forced to win the RR to get a title shot.
Problems with that are:
A) Booker would have to hold on to the title from now til April 1st
B) Batista would have to win the RR and stay healthy til April 1st
C) The outcome of the match at WM wouldnt be in question one bit.
Didn't they do that entire deal with Brock? He lost his last shot at the title, and had to win the RR to finally get another shot. It was either him or someone else over the past few years.
I'd let Batista get the title before WM, if they must give it to him, and let him defend at WM. At least that way we wouldn't know for sure that he'd win the match or not. Someone mentioned Batista/Taker at WM, Title vs. Streak.