

kkktookmybabyaway
Members-
Content count
14094 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Everything posted by kkktookmybabyaway
-
So I recently got a Facebook account. Want to link up? PM me your name/e-mail. I have Carnival confirmed so I figure it can't get worse. 10 p.m. • So I saw the following headline on Drudge: HITWISE INTERNET NEWS RACE: YAHOO OVER CNN.COM... GOOGLE TOPS DRUDGE... MORE... Oh what the hell, let's give this a shot. I opened it up, and it was a PDF. I looked at the Top 10 News and Media Category Websites Ranked By US Market Share of Visits. Yahoo! News The Weather Channel - US CNN.com MSNBC Google News Drudge Report Yahoo! Weather OMG FAUXFox NewsLOL2008~! The New York Times People Magazine I then went to Top Search Terms for News and Media Category. From the PDF file description: "The following report lists the most popular search terms for the 1 week ending 12/13/2008, that resulted in traffic to websites classified by Hitwise within the 'News and Media' industry. For example, the most popular search term was 'cnn' representing 0.69% of all search terms that delivered users to websites classified by Hitwise within the 'News and Media' industry." Now I wonder why someone puts "CNN" in a search engine when "www.cnn.com" would make more sense, but whatever. Here is the list. Take a gander at what was #19. cnn weather OMG FAUXfox newsLOL2008~! drudge drudge report weather.com msnbc weather channel cnn.com news caylee anthony huffington post tv guide noaa people accuweather national weather service yahoo jennifer aniston new york times • Get used to this. Today a state computer. Tomorrow your home PC (after they take your guns away first, of course). If the speech gestapo ever stumble across this place I'm fucked. LOL "State officials were unaware..." Yeah, I'm sure some Alaska public servant is working 40 hours/week going through other people's e-mails. Then again, there probably is an entire department for this. I may stand corrected on this one.
-
12/14: A Message To Smues
kkktookmybabyaway commented on kkktookmybabyaway's blog entry in KK's Korner
No. ESPN don't like him no more. -
I normally don't pay attention to the NFL's Thursday Night Game, so I didn't know who won/covered the spread. After going through your picks this week I now know New Orleans was the victor -- either outright or the team lost by less than 3.5 points. Thanks for saving me a trip to NFL.com. 1 p.m. • So the guy from Oklahoma won the Heisman. Whatever. I was pulling for Colt, but this guy had the bigger numbers 'n stuff. Not like any of this matters in the NFL, though. • And last night while having SportsCenter on as background noise, I got to hear this gem. Some idiot anchor was trying to make a connection with the RECSSSION and people getting there jobs turk'en with the plethora of NBA coaches getting fired. Uh, dipshit, NBA coaches getting fired isn't quite the same as Joe Blow getting laid off because his business is closing. Why can't you idiots just stick to reading scores? Even Jay Harris, who is probably my favorite SportsCenter anchor, was acting a fool alongside this other guy, who I saw host a NFL Live once in a while but that's about it. Ugh.
-
Here are two rule change suggestions: 1) On weeks where there will be Thursday games (or other non-traditional days like Saturdays), I would put up the thread early with only picks for those games. The spread for these early games will go up early in the week, such as late Monday/Tuesday. The remaining spreads will be posted Wednesday/Thursday. That will require two separate instances for you to post picks, but it will give you more time to send in the early game pick. By holding off on calling spreads for the Sunday games later in the week, the spreads posted will be more accurate than if I post them Monday/Tuesday, which is the reason I have held off on doing this. ****************************************** 2) If you are on a losing team and have no chance at the playoffs, I had an idea as to "phone in" your picks. For example, if you are 0-12, let me know via PM you wish to "phone in" the rest of the season. This way, if someone is having a bad year, the team he represents will still be competitive for the rest of the year. I would not announce publicly who has "phoned in" his picks. I would also ask you come up with a different formula to "phone in" your picks so someone doesn't catch on that you were picking all home teams for two consecutive weeks. You would also need TB scores as well. I know many of you still send in picks when your team's record is sub.-500, but I don't want to lose long-time participants because of a bad year and their mind moves elsewhere. And remember, even though you may go against someone that didn't submit picks for a Thursday game and TB score, this advantage may also go to a person who you are competing with for that final playoff spot. ****************************************** When you submit your picks this week, please let me know if you vote "yay" or "nay" on these two proposals. Saying "I don't care" or "Do whatever" counts as a "nay," as does not voting at all. We must have a majority of teams (17) agree with each proposal in order to make each one pass.
-
Regular-season tie-breakers are handled the same way here as in the NFL. I'll copy and paste my usual rules for this later this week. I also peered into the crystal ball for Week 17: Jacksonville Jaguars (Always Pissed Off) 7-7 @ Baltimore Ravens (King PK) 8-5-1 New England Patriots (Harley Quinn) 8-6 @ Buffalo Bills (Bob Barron) 7-7 Washington Redskins (Human Fly) 7-7 @ San Francisco 49ers (Devo) 9-5 Dallas Cowboys (Hawk) 7-7 @ Philadelphia Eagles (Starvenger) 12-2 New York Giants (Cartman) 7-7 @ Minnesota Vikings (Danville Wrestling) 10-4
-
Hey, you people elect them. I have to LOL regarding "the rich" paying more for luxury items. Because it worked so well with George H.W. Bush taxed yachts during his administration. I also have to LOL when people make fun of the South for being overwhelmingly Republican considering the Northeast is more Blue than the South is Red. 10:30 p.m. • I like Charles Barkley. He's an entertaining fellow. But please STFU already about this. As most of you know, when it comes to college football I know jack shit. However, once I found out Chizik was the defensive coordinator at Auburn a few years ago when the team was 13-0 and in a BcS "National Title" controversy I knew the "Number 1" reason he was picked. He's a good ol' boy that had success at the school not too long ago. Complain about that if you want. But when you, and other PC faggots, start throwing around the RACSIM~! card, most of us just roll our eyes and go "n*gga plz." Charles added that Turner Gill would have won at Auburn if given the chance. Other ESPN pinheads have commented on Chizik's record at Iowa State. Fair enough. I wondered a bit why a 5-19 record warranted a career advancement. However, would Turner Gill have been successful at Iowa State after two seasons? Maybe Chizik was in a bad situation and wanted to get out. The Big 12 is a bigger playground than the Mid-American Conference. Because I'm curious, I decided to compare the resumes of both Chizik and Gill. From Wiki: Chizik Gill So which one would you take? I would go with Chizik because he played a bigger part in the success of the schools he was a coordinator at than Gill and his accomplishments. Guess that makes me a RACIST~! Then again, Gill's photo isn't on Wiki, yet Chizik has an image posted. Uh-oh. Could it be Wiki-RACISM~!?
-
Harley, Bob is already up 1-0 on you and you two meet Week 17.
-
Tentative rankings -- Once again, if you have the same record as someone else, tie-breakers are not being taken into consideration just yet. AFC *Pittsburgh Steelers (Kahran Ramsus) 9-4-1 *Denver Broncos (Canadian Chris) 9-5 Baltimore Ravens (King PK) 8-5-1 *New England Patriots (Harley Quinn) 8-6 *Houston Texans (Bored) 8-6 Kansas City Chiefs (BX) 8-6 Buffalo Bills (Bob Barron) 7-7 New York Jets (Gert) 7-7 Jacksonville Jaguars (Always Pissed Off) 7-7 Cleveland Browns (SFA Jack) 6-7-1 San Diego Chargers (909) 6-8 Miami Dolphins (Spaceman Spiff) 5-9 Indianapolis Colts (Alfdogg) 5-9 Oakland Raiders (Smues) 5-9 Cincinnati Bengals (Teke) 4-9-1 Tennessee Titans (Cuban Linx) 3-9-2 NFC *Philadelphia Eagles (Starvenger) 12-2 *Atlanta Falcons (Rocket) 11-3 *Minnesota Vikings (Danville Wrestling) 10-4 *San Francisco 49ers (Devo) 9-5 Seattle Seahawks (UZI) 8-6 New York Giants (Cartman) 7-7 Washington Redskins (Human Fly) 7-7 Dallas Cowboys (Hawk) 7-7 Green Bay Packers (VX) 7-7 Carolina Panthers (Fazzle) 7-7 Detroit Lions (Chazz) 6-8 New Orleans Saints (Brooklyn Zoo) 6-8 Tampa Bay Buccaneers (Agent Bond) 5-9 St. Louis Rams (Canadian Guitarist) 5-9 Arizona Cardinals (Vern Gagne) 5-9 Chicago Bears (Agent of Oblivion) 4-10 Week 16 notable match-ups: Baltimore Ravens (King PK 8-5-1) @ Dallas Cowboys (Hawk 7-7) Buffalo Bills (Bob Barron 7-7) @ Denver Broncos (Canadian Chris 9-5) New York Jets (Gert 7-7) @ Seattle Seahawks (UZI 8-6) Atlanta Falcons (Rocket 11-3) @ Minnesota Vikings (Danville Wrestling 10-4) Philadelphia Eagles (Starvenger 12-2) @ Washington Redskins (Human Fly 7-7) Carolina Panthers (Fazzle 7-7) @ New York Giants (Cartman 7-7)
-
12/14: A Message To Smues
kkktookmybabyaway commented on kkktookmybabyaway's blog entry in KK's Korner
No. If I see him again I'll try to get the name. He's a big (or at least bigger than most anchors) black guy with a loud voice. -
I didn't think it was a TD, but if that's the rule then the refs got it right. Thanks Chris.
-
Deadline has come and gone.
-
Long story short. On Tuesday I posted the Week 14 spreads. I asked a certain mod to change my Topic Description. Little did I know that he wound up deleting the thread. I'm not going to name names, but let's just say I doubt he would have made such an error if this was a BASEBALL PICK 'EM CONTEST. Because of this, I will not be using the Thursday Night Game this week. Twelve hours is not enough time to post a spread and expect 32 people in multiple time zones to make their picks. Smues and 909, this week pick any team you want and give me the score. Spreads for the rest of the games this week will be posted Thursday night at around 8 p.m. EST. Now it's off to work. (I have the picks for TEN saved, so don't worry about having to re-submit them, cletus. If you want to change them just make another post; I won't be posting your picks in the matchup spreads until late Saturday/Sunday) PS: Alfdogg, before your thread was deleted, I took your matchups and will paste your work later tonight. (Your efforts weren't wasted.) Oakland at San Diego Washington at Baltimore (5.5) 10-24 Jacksonville at Chicago (6.5) 10-23 (8.5) Minnesota at Detroit 20-16 Houston at Green Bay (6.5) 24-21 Cincinnati at Indianapolis (13.5) 3-35 Atlanta at New Orleans (2.5) 25-29 Philadelphia at N.Y. Giants (7.5) 20-14 Cleveland at Tennessee (13.5) 9-28 Miami at Buffalo (0.5) 16-3 Kansas City at Denver (9.5) 17-24 (3.5) N.Y. Jets at San Francisco 14-24 St. Louis at Arizona (14.5) 10-34 Dallas at Pittsburgh (3.5) 13-20 (4.5) New England at Seattle 24-21 Tampa Bay at Carolina (2.5) Key: BAL/CHI/DET/HOU/IND/NO/PHI/TEN/MIA/KC/SF/AZ/PIT/SEA Oakland (Smues 4-9) d San Diego (909 6-7) 6-6 OAK: WAS/CHI/MIN/GB/CIN/NO/NYG/CLE/MIA/DEN/NYJ/AZ/PIT/NE/CAR (AZ: 35-34=1) SD: BAL/CHI/MIN/GB/IND/ATL/NYG/TEN/MIA/DEN/NYJ/AZ/DAL/NE/TB (KC: 15-17=2) DIFF: WAS/BAL, CIN/IND, NO/ATL, CLE/TEN, PIT/DAL, CAR/TB, 35/15 Cincinnati (Teke 3-9-1) d Indianapolis (Alfdogg 5-8) 9-7 CIN: BAL/CHI/DET/GB/IND/ATL/PHI/TEN/BUF/KC/NYJ/STL/PIT/NE/CAR/EP IND: WAS/JAX/DET/GB/IND/ATL/NYG/TEN/MIA/DEN/NYJ/AZ/PIT/NE/CAR/34 DIFF: BAL/WAS, CHI/JAX, PHI/NYG, BUF/MIA, KC/DEN, STL/AZ, EP/34 Jacksonville (AlwaysPissedOff 6-7) d by Chicago (Agent of Oblivion 3-10) 8-10 JAX: BAL/JAX/MIN/GB/IND/NO/NYG/TEN/MIA/DEN/NYJ/AZ/PIT/NE/CAR/13 CHI: BAL/CHI/DET/HOU/IND/NO/NYG/CLE/BUF/DEN/NYJ/AZ/PIT/SEA/CAR/EP DIFF: JAX/CHI, MIN/DET, GB/HOU, TEN/CLE, MIA/BUF, NE/SEA, 13/EP Houston (Bored 8-5) d Green Bay (Vitamin X 7-6) 9-7 HOU: BAL/CHI/MIN/GB/IND/ATL/PHI/TEN/MIA/DEN/NYJ/AZ/PIT/SEA/TB/24 GB: BAL/JAX/DET/GB/IND/ATL/PHI/TEN/MIA/DEN/NYJ/STL/PIT/NE/TB/28 DIFF: CHI/JAX, MIN/DET, AZ/STL, SEA/NE, 24/28 Cleveland (sfaJack 6-6-1) ties Tennessee (Cuban Linx 2-9-2) 7-7 CLE: BAL/CHI/MIN/GB/IND/ATL/NYG/TEN/BUF/DEN/NYJ/AZ/PIT/NE/CAR/16(-9=7) TEN: BAL/CHI/MIN/GB/IND/ATL/NYG/TEN/MIA/DEN/NYJ/AZ/PIT/NE/TB/21(-28=7) DIFF: BUF/MIA, CAR/TB, 16/21 Minnesota (Danville Wrestling 10-3) d by Detroit (Chazz 5-8) 4-8 MIN: WAS/CHI/MIN/GB/IND/ATL/NYG/TEN/BUF/KC/NYJ/STL/DAL/NE/TB/32(-20=12) DET: BAL/JAX/MIN/HOU/IND/ATL/NYG/TEN/MIA/KC/NYJ/STL/PIT/NE/CAR/14(-16=2) DIFF: WAS/BAL, CHI/JAX, GB/HOU, BUF/MIA, DAL/PIT, TB/CAR, 32/14 Washington (Human Fly 7-6) d by Baltimore (KingPK 8-4-1) 7-7 WAS: BAL/CHI/MIN/GB/IND/ATL/NYG/TEN/MIA/KC/NYJ/STL/DAL/NE/CAR/17(-10=7) BAL: BAL/CHI/MIN/GB/IND/ATL/NYG/TEN/MIA/KC/NYJ/AZ/DAL/NE/TB/28(-24=4) DIFF: STL/AZ, CAR/TB, 17/28 Philadelphia (Starvenger 11-2) d N.Y. Giants (Cartman 6-7) 9-7 PHI: BAL/CHI/MIN/HOU/IND/NO/NYG/TEN/MIA/DEN/NYJ/STL/PIT/NE/CAR/14 NYG: BAL/JAX/MIN/GB/IND/ATL/NYG/TEN/MIA/DEN/NYJ/AZ/PIT/NE/CAR/24 DIFF: CHI/JAX, HOU/GB, NO/ATL, STL/AZ, 14/24 Atlanta (Porter 10-3) d New Orleans (Brooklyn Zoo 6-7) 7-4 ATL: BAL/CHI/MIN/GB/IND/ATL/PHI/CLE/MIA/KC/NYJ/AZ/DAL/NE/TB/31 NO: WAS/JAX/MIN/GB/IND/NO/NYG/TEN/BUF/DEN/NYJ/STL/DAL/NE/CAR/28 DIFF: BAL/WAS, CHI/JAX, ATL/NO, PHI/NYG, CLE/TEN, MIA/BUF, KC/DEN, AZ/STL, TB/CAR N.Y. Jets (Gert T 7-6) d San Francisco (devo 8-5) 8-5 NYJ: BAL/JAX/MIN/GB/IND/NO/NYG/TEN/MIA/DEN/NYJ/AZ/PIT/NE/CAR/24 SF: WAS/JAX/MIN/GB/IND/NO/NYG/CLE/MIA/DEN/NYJ/AZ/PIT/NE/TB/14 DIFF: BAL/WAS, TEN/CLE, CAR/TB Miami (Spaceman Spiff 5-8) d by Buffalo (bob_barron 6-7) 8-11 MIA: BAL/CHI/MIN/GB/IND/ATL/PHI/TEN/MIA/DEN/NYJ/AZ/PIT/NE/TB/24 BUF: BAL/CHI/DET/GB/IND/NO/PHI/TEN/MIA/DEN/NYJ/AZ/PIT/NE/CAR/17 DIFF: MIN/DET, ATL/NO, TB/CAR Kansas City (BX 7-6) d by Denver (CanadianChris 8-5) 8-7 KC: WAS/CHI/DET/HOU/IND/ATL/NYG/TEN/MIA/DEN/NYJ/STL/DAL/NE/CAR/10 DEN: BAL/CHI/MIN/GB/IND/ATL/NYG/TEN/MIA/DEN/NYJ/AZ/PIT/NE/CAR/27 DIFF: WAS/BAL, DET/MIN, HOU/GB, STL/AZ, DAL/PIT St. Louis (CanadianGuitarist 5-8) d Arizona (Vern Gagne 4-9) 8-5 STL: WAS/CHI/MIN/HOU/IND/NO/NYG/TEN/MIA/DEN/NYJ/ARI/PIT/NE/TB/11 AZ: WAS/CHI/MIN/GB/IND/ATL/PHI/TEN/BUF/DEN/NYJ/AZ/DAL/NE/TB/35 DIFF: HOU/GB, NO/ATL, NYG/PHI, MIA/BUF, PIT/DAL Dallas (Hawk 34 7-6) d by Pittsburgh (Kahran Ramsus 8-4-1) 4-9 DAL: WAS/CHI/MIN/HOU/CIN/ATL/NYG/TEN/MIA/DEN/NYJ/STL/DAL/NE/TB/17 PIT: BAL/CHI/DET/GB/IND/ATL/NYG/TEN/MIA/KC/NYJ/AZ/PIT/NE/TB/28 DIFF: WAS/BAL, MIN/DET, HOU/GB, CIN/IND, DEN/KC, STL/AZ, DAL/PIT New England (HarleyQuinn 8-5) d Seattle (UZI Suicide 7-6) 9-6 NE: BAL/CHI/MIN/HOU/IND/ATL/NYG/TEN/MIA/KC/NYJ/AZ/PIT/NE/TB/20 SEA: BAL/JAX/MIN/GB/IND/NO/NYG/TEN/BUF/DEN/NYJ/AZ/DAL/NE/CAR/14 DIFF: CHI/JAX, HOU/GB, ATL/NO, MIA/BUF, KC/DEN, PIT/DAL, TB/CAR Tampa Bay (Agent_Bond34 5-8) d Carolina (fazzle 7-6) 8-7 TB: WAS/CHI/MIN/GB/IND/ATL/PHI/CLE/MIA/KC/SF/STL/PIT/NE/CAR/27 CAR: WAS/CHI/MIN/GB/IND/ATL/NYG/TEN/MIA/KC/NYJ/AZ/DAL/NE/CAR/22 DIFF: PHI/NYG, CLE/TEN, SF/NYJ, STL/AZ, PIT/DAL
-
AFC EAST New England Patriots (Harley Quinn) 8-5 < PF: 109, PA: 89, AFC: 5-5, NFC: 3-0, DIV: 3-2 > New York Jets (Gert) 7-6 < PF: 96, PA: 91, AFC: 5-5, NFC: 2-1, DIV: 2-2 > Buffalo Bills (Bob Barron) 6-7 < PF: 96, PA: 99, AFC: 4-5, NFC: 2-2, DIV: 2-2 > Miami Dolphins (Spaceman Spiff) 5-8 < PF: 108, PA: 114, AFC: 4-6, NFC: 1-2, DIV: 2-3 > AFC NORTH Pittsburgh Steelers (Kahran Ramsus) 8-4-1 < PF: 93, PA: 88, AFC: 5-3-1, NFC: 3-1, DIV: 2-1-1 > Baltimore Ravens (King PK) 8-4-1 < PF: 101, PA: 96, AFC: 6-3-1, NFC: 2-1, DIV: 3-2 > Cleveland Browns (SFA Jack) 6-6-1 < PF: 95, PA: 91, AFC: 5-3-1, NFC: 1-3, DIV: 3-1 > Cincinnati Bengals (Teke) 3-9-1 < PF: 97, PA: 105, AFC: 3-6-1, NFC: 0-3, DIV: 0-4-1 > AFC SOUTH Houston Texans (Bored) 8-5 < PF: 97, PA: 95, AFC: 6-4, NFC: 2-1, DIV: 5-0 > Jacksonville Jaguars (Always Pissed Off) 6-7 < PF: 92, PA: 99, AFC: 5-5, NFC: 1-2, DIV: 1-4 > Indianapolis Colts (Alfdogg) 5-8 < PF: 88, PA: 96, AFC: 4-6, NFC: 1-2, DIV: 2-2 > Tennessee Titans (Cuban Linx) 2-9-2 < PF: 98, PA: 104, AFC: 1-6-2, NFC: 1-3, DIV: 1-3 > AFC WEST Denver Broncos (Canadian Chris) 8-5 < PF: 92, PA: 85, AFC: 7-3, NFC: 1-2, DIV: 4-1 > Kansas City Chiefs (BX) 7-6 < PF: 101, PA: 96, AFC: 5-4, NFC: 2-2, DIV: 3-2 > San Diego Chargers (909) 6-7 < PF: 85, PA: 92, AFC: 5-5, NFC: 1-2, DIV: 1-3 > Oakland Raiders (Smues) 4-9 < PF: 91, PA: 101, AFC: 4-6, NFC: 0-3, DIV: 2-4 > NFC EAST Philadelphia Eagles (Starvenger) 11-2 < PF: 100, PA: 84, AFC: 3-0, NFC: 8-2, DIV: 3-1 > Washington Redskins (Human Fly) 7-6 < PF: 90, PA: 87, AFC: 1-2, NFC: 6-4, DIV: 2-3 > Dallas Cowboys (Hawk) 7-6 < PF: 91, PA: 94, AFC: 2-1, NFC: 5-5, DIV: 1-3 > New York Giants (Cartman) 6-7 < PF: 92, PA: 100, AFC: 2-2, NFC: 4-5, DIV: 3-2 > NFC NORTH Minnesota Vikings (Danville Wrestling) 10-3< PF: 102, PA: 84, AFC: 4-0, NFC: 6-3, DIV: 4-2 > Green Bay Packers (VX) 7-6 < PF: 94, PA: 96, AFC: 1-2, NFC: 6-4, DIV: 3-1 > Detroit Lions (Chazz) 5-8 < PF: 95, PA: 90, AFC: 1-2, NFC: 4-6, DIV: 3-2 > Chicago Bears (Agent of Oblivion) 3-10 < PF: 88, PA: 103, AFC: 2-1, NFC: 1-9, DIV: 0-5 > NFC SOUTH Atlanta Falcons (Rocket) 10-3 < PF: 110, PA: 84, AFC: 4-0, NFC: 6-3, DIV: 4-1 > Carolina Panthers (Fazzle) 7-6 < PF: 92, PA: 103, AFC: 2-1, NFC: 5-5, DIV: 3-2 > New Orleans Saints (Brooklyn Zoo) 6-7 < PF: 90, PA: 95, AFC: 3-1, NFC: 3-6, DIV: 1-4 > Tampa Bay Buccaneers (Agent Bond) 5-8 < PF: 90, PA: 94, AFC: 0-2, NFC: 5-6, DIV: 2-3 > NFC WEST San Francisco 49ers (Devo) 8-5 < PF: 95, PA: 92, AFC: 0-3, NFC: 8-2, DIV: 3-2 > Seattle Seahawks (UZI) 7-6 < PF: 101, PA: 93, AFC: 2-1, NFC: 5-5, DIV: 3-1 > St. Louis Rams (Canadian Guitarist) 5-8 < PF: 87, PA: 95, AFC: 1-3, NFC: 4-5, DIV: 2-2 > Arizona Cardinals (Vern Gagne) 4-9 < PF: 93, PA: 106, AFC: 2-1, NFC: 2-8, DIV: 1-4 >
-
Link. Arrested? Uncle Sam ought to be making you in charge of Social Security. I guess the government cracks down on those in direct competition with its own Ponzi scheme.
-
12/11: A Message To Newsweek
kkktookmybabyaway commented on kkktookmybabyaway's blog entry in KK's Korner
The story was probably posted at 2:36 a.m. because Snoozeweek probably released the info right before closing time for its PR division. -
You guys are a supposed to be a news organization. You're supposed to up 24/7 trying to get the latest scoop and all that hippie stuff. Then how come there was nobody available for comment for this story? Granted the payroll is more than 100 warm bodies lighter, but still. I love it when media outlets clam up like the organizations they report about. Maybe you could print up another batch of "Osama Elected" SPECIAL EDITIONS for some quick cash. 10 p.m. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. That's all I'm going to say. • So it was 7:20 p.m. and the better half and I were getting frisky. And by frisky I mean... Don't say I didn't warn you, because you were. Now Thursday is when I get some peace and quiet Mrs. kkk's night for watching network television. She watches Survivor, CSI and some other crappy show after that. Now it was 40 minutes until Survivor, so I made a joke about what if you miss tonight's episode. "It's on On Demand," she replied. I go into the bedroom to, well, you know... ...and I'm still waiting. The heck? It doesn't take that long to swallow a birth control pill. I walk out into the living room and what do I see? She's setting the DVR to record Survivor. Glad the thought of my beefstick still gets her scampering off onto the love mattress. And for the record, she finished in time for Survivor's opening segment. • I generally don't like McDonald's ads, but I like this batch. The hell? When have attack ads NOT been popular? Then again, I don't think I'd want these two going at it head-to-head. Oh heck, if you've made it through today's entry you deserve it...
-
Thursday deadline has come and gone.
-
Suck it, "global warming" nutjobs
kkktookmybabyaway commented on sfaJack's blog entry in Notes From Cubicle 211-A
It snowed BECAUSE of global warming. Don't you get it? -
Moving water, whether it's from a fountain or a sink, tastes better/fresher to them than water that's been sitting in a bowl. And colder, too.
-
Chris Osgood = HOF?
kkktookmybabyaway commented on Prophet of Mike Zagurski's blog entry in TakerHart's Blog
The baseball playoffs and hockey playoffs are two different beasts. I would consider going deep into the playoffs, NHL style, to be the conference championship, and even then to stretch it out to a Game 6 or 7 if you happen to be on the losing side. -
Chris Osgood = HOF?
kkktookmybabyaway commented on Prophet of Mike Zagurski's blog entry in TakerHart's Blog
I'd say no. Don't ask me for facts to back this up or anything crazy like that. And what would you consider an "impact on playoff races" in the NHL? -
Will the person I offered his team to accept in time for the Thursday night game? Will Porter come back once I told him that I would still accept picks from him even though he is retired but will probably return before the Super Bowl? Will a non-playoff team be given the chance of a lifetime to take part in the playoffs? Will nothing happen at all? You'll have to tune in and find out.
-
-
Sorry to hear about your cat Dubq. And I feel bad for those dogs being chained up like that.
-
Did he/she just topple it over with a few pushes or get a running start and leap into the tree?