Rob E Dangerously

and I guess you can't show me how the previous samples were an accurate depiction of reality. and up 4 among likely voters. Which is more realistic? (hint: not the one that has your guy up more) http://people-press.org/reports/tables/227.pdf And somehow.. their polls went from 48-40 Bush to 48-41 Bush while Bush lost support on Independent voters (from 46 to 42) and Democrats (from 10 to 9 percent) while keeping support from Republicans (90 percent). Bush only stood his ground with one party, lost ground with the Democrats and with Independent voters, and remained at 48% but here's the Pew methodology: http://people-press.org/reports/methodology.php3

Are you going to answer the question or not? for the skeptical types: http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselect...29-gop-poll.htm

Care to provide proof that the following party ID samples are an accurate depiction of America? 43% Republicans, 31% Democrats, 25% Independents 40% Republicans, 33% Democrats, 27% Independents those were the samples for the 9/13-9/15 and 9/24-9/26 Gallup polls The 9/24-9/26 poll's sample percentage of Republicans is only outdone by the March 26-28 poll (which sampled 44% Republicans and that was 51-47 Bush) So.. is America 43% Republican?

Unless someone was able to remotely scramble an earpiece in that place.. which is sorta unlikely.. then I doubt Bush had an earpiece.

Gallup is.. interesting they also had Gore down by 13 points in late October and Kerry just covered a 13 point Gallup deficit

"Multilateral is the best option" equals "China will end the talks if we do anything else" in your world. Does this messenger have anything more than a press release that they can use as proof of their claim? Does his messenger have ties to Bush? Would someone tied to Bush have any possible reason to bash Kerry? I guess since every messenger has credibility, it's time to find as many crazy slimeballs as possible to claim stuff about Bush. And also, James Carville too. And then people will attack them, instead of their "true until proven otherwise" claims. http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/05/11/teresa.kerry/ http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/release...2004_0511b.html she could.. then you'd find something else that you'd want released, and so on, and so on somewhere in this timeframe, you might realize that John and Teresa file seperate returns. But, that's unlikely

Drudge is as credible as the NYT.

So.. because they say the 6 nation talks are the best means that they won't do anything else. That's convincing. Considering that the quotes I mentioned claimed the bilateral would be a second forum. But.. with proof like that.. damn.. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4734048/ Mike.. when you're taking stuff from the ATR site.. you could always mention it.. http://www.atr.org/pressreleases/2004/pr-k...axes-9-7-04.htm hmm.. nothing tells me that Grover Norquist could be biased or possibly wrong. Nothing... at... all... Why would Grover lie?

Even you're saying it was at the least, barely a win. Knowing your partisan and biased nature, that probably means that Kerry did win.

Pursuing bilateral talks with N. Korea, which China has made more than abundantly clear that they do not like --- but, hey, as long as they're not French or German, ignoring them is peachy. via Time, http://www.time.com/time/election2004/arti...09071-2,00.html : http://msnbc.msn.com/id/6161107/site/newsweek/ http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsPackageArticl...47&section=news Considering how prevalently summits and the UN were a part of his answers --- yup. "I have a plan to have a summit with all of the allies, something this president has not yet achieved, not yet been able to do to bring people to the table. " "I'm going to hold that summit. I will bring fresh credibility, a new start, and we will get the job done right." "But this president hasn't even held the kind of statesman-like summits that pull people together and get them to invest in those states. In fact, he's done the opposite. He pushed them away." it's so obvious.. And the summit requirement is covered.. since the Arab Nations are having a summit, and there's a summit for people who want to donate stuff to something. Therefore, we don't need to have any new summits at all, because we're obviously having summits right now. The President gets $400K a year Senators get $158,100 a year When it comes to that income.. obviously Bush will pay more taxes. And Kerry's wealth was manily though inheritence. Such as the trusts of his mother. That wouldn't be covered under the income tax. I'd imagine that it was taxed under the inheritence tax (which I'm pretty sure Kerry isn't in favor of reducing). I'd be interested to see if John Kerry is raking in the dough from anything else. Remember: Kerry did not combine his wealth with Teresa on their marriage. Kerry, who would roll back the tax cut for those making over 200K (including himself, especially under the Presidential salary) is bad Bush, who is doing the opposite, is good.

John Kerry had a shiny object on his sleeve, which distracted George W. Bush

"It's Hard Work"

"We butchered the Democrats present at the debate. We have taken a huge lead! Whenever we attack, they retreat. When we pound them with our substance, they retreat even deeper. But when we stopped pounding, they made up a poll for propaganda purposes! The Democrats are committing suicide by the hundreds on the gates of Washington. Be assured, our lead is safe, protected" "[Kerry]'s melting down. When he loses, you'll point to this also." - Mike, 8/21/04 "[Kerry]'s losing support quickly and it's only getting uglier. His campaign is progeressively looking less and less serious." - Mike, 9/9/04 "Somebody linked to intentionally planting stories to turn an election they're losing BADLY is worse than somebody covering up a 3rd rate burglary." - Mike, 9/21/04 "The Dems are simply working their ass off to explain why their guy tanked so royally in an election they mistakenly felt was in the bag." - Mike 9/21/04 "Blaming Gallup because Kerry is tanking is sad" - Mike, 9/29/04 "Kerry is STILL sucking eggs --- but a runaway election isn't fun for the news, so they want to make a competition where one does not exist." - Mike, 10/2/04 "Kerry is still going down. Hard. Hell, Bush still leads in the states." - Mike, 10/3/04 -- as for the policies. One would be Iran. The other would be.. I'd imagine that the Iranian denial doesn't mean that the talk of "He'd give them nukes" would stop" as for the ammo.. yeah.. picking out one sentence and ignoring the rest of the statement is ammoriffic. I guess your countrymen means "I will cede all power to the UN and the French" although it is interesting that Bush is concerned about how Kerry would be able to pay for stuff that would go to homeland security. Since it's more vital to keep a tax cut on the richest Americans than to help enhance the security of this nation

Blaming Gallup when Bush is tanking is sad.

Kerry had a neuron gun which made the President incoherant. And he wore lifts in his shoes.

The Royals will be restructing their strength and conditioning staff for 2005 BTW.. going into the game today, they had 10 players who were injured

BYU

pre-emptive reply to criticism of Gallup: "Blaming Gallup because Bush is tanking is sad" then again.. Gallup is probably in a conspiracy here.. they want to make it look like Bush is winning, because he is, then they stack it for Kerry, to try and discourage the massive landslide. We'll see what the interals are.. but here's the swings in the last 2 weeks LV- Now: 49/49 Week ago: 52/44 Bush 2 weeks ago: 55/42 Bush RV Now: 49/47 Bush Week ago: 54/41 Bush 2 weeks ago: 52/44 Bush

It's probably my Bush sig *glances at arms*.. why does the Sun hate me?

The new Gallup results: We'll have to see if they did the fair sample (40% Republicans) or the unfair evil sample (anything else.. they better not be sending mixed messeges).. But if you're relying on Gallup.. then Kerry erased a 13 point deficit (in LV) in just two weeks. RV was 54-41 Bush a week ago, and it's now 49-47 Bush. http://www.usatoday.com/news/politicselect...atodaypolls.htm But, I refuse to change my stance of "Gallup Sucks", especially not until we get the internals for this poll.

No, I didn't. Brief enough for you?

Which is why Rob scares me so. high-larity Mike.. since you're never wrong and all

Except you. And I praise all my fellow Snitskymaniacs

I'm so sad that I haven't made enough stupid statements. Really. I am. The avatar is enough most of it was on a Sunday morning. But still.. it's not like I had anything better to do. nope.. but then again, weren't you posting around the same time on Saturday Night? It's called alliteration. Baghdad Bob. Myrtle Beach Mike. We love you for your accurate predictions.

I just got finished with sleeping and you never know when you need a MikeSC quote. Especially when he keeps mentioning that Kerry is melting down and going to lose. Just for the sake of whoever.. I'll go a bit more in-depth on the quotes. 2003: 1 though 4 - basically that was Strom-related backtracking (from, I voted for his staff to I voted for him since there was nobody better) 5 - Mike usually gives the GOP credit for passing the Civil Rights Act, ignoring that the GOP didn't take credit for it in 1964 when they nominated Senator Goldwater (who voted against it) 6 - This is either tragic or humorous, depending on how demented you are, but then again.. it is a tough spot to be in 7 - Nothing like some AARP dissing.. old people = confused 8 - Crappy Kerry prediction #1 from Mike 9 and 10 - 10 saves 9 from being viewed as blatantly racist. Although that depends on your opinion 11 - Strangely enough, he didn't provide a specific example, unless that "sub-human terrorist monkeys" thing covers entire nations now. Which would be questionable January though May 2004: 12 - We're to blame for the violence in Iraq! 13 - One of the few accurate Kerry-related predictions from Mike. And it seems Kerry is adapting well. 14 - Election-related prediction 15 - So.. Mike hates a culture which has a lot of terrorists. Which would probably include Islam. But there's probably a cover to this too. 16 - The SC stands for "Super Cool" 17 - It's not a quoteable withoutt homoeroticism 18 - or flattery 19 - nothing like promising to piss off an entire board a lot. 20 - "It's not my fault" June: 21 - another PSA from Mike 22 - Probably true 23 - That's from the evil reporter thread. I don't have anything from the "Democrats are hiring rapists" thread or the Outsourcing thread 24 - Unfortunately, Mike fell out of his chair before he was able to finish this statement. Nah.. he just didn't finish it. I also didn't put in the quote about how Rock the Vote was partisan. 25 - This is what we call "projection", sorta like when Jimmy Swaggert condemns porn. Project your problems onto others subconsciously. 26 - Mike shows his debating skills by declaring "file this under tough shit" 27 - I think that would be a typo.. but yourless isn't close to useless 28 - Mike hears something from Drudge.. believes it, massively 29 - Turns out Edwards did win NC.. something I noted then. 30 - Drudge = double plus reliable July: 31 - Kerry-statement 32 - Projection 33 - Projection 34 - Bush is very smart.. and he shows it by making people think he is dumb. But he has an advantage in terrorism. 35 - Strange how that's worked in Iraq 36 - Pure opinion about the genius of George W. Bush 37- Kerry-prediction 38 - Mike misses the reason why Quayle was mocked 39 and 40 - The NAACP invites you to a black cross burning.. ya know. August: 41 - First statement on the SBVFT ad. Which is seemingly contradicted by later statements. 42 - I think this is another statement that was later contradicted. 43 - Kerry prediction 44 - Personal insult September: 45 - Kerry-prediction 46 - Mike puts amputees in their place 47 - probably out of context. 48 - Time is everything 49 - Cleeland-insult 50 and 51 - more fun shots at Kerry, from noted war hero, MikeSC 52 - Kerry-prediction and Watergate revisionism 53 - Kerry-prediction 54 - Illogical 55 - "Kerry is doomed" statement October: 56 - "Kerry will lose easily" I don't expect any minds to be changed. I did store some of the Kerry predictions. The rest was searching for posts by him with a term in them (which is easy).. it's not like I had anything else to do. I slept this morning probably High-larity..