SuperJerk

About the Melina thing: If I was a woman, and I wanted to sue a guy for sexual harrassment, I sure as hell wouldn't do it if there was a video tape of me sexually propositioning him that'd been viewed by 3-4 million people.

My understanding of the Big Bang theory is that the universe came from a super-compressed piece of matter that exploded and expanded into the universe see have today. There is strong evidence to support the Big Bang since the expansion of the universe is a measurable phenomena. The Big Bang theory makes no attempt to explain where the piece of matter came from. I believe string theory attempts to explain that part. If you want to be religious about it, you could say that God put the super-compressed piece of matter in the center of the universe and blew it up. Then once the universe was in place, he engineered evolution.

Are they TRYING to make me not watch?

I can only imagine what other types of heel gimmicks that promotion has. Can you imagine how bad a wrestling promotion owned by a "fitness" product would be?

That doesn't stop Juggernaut, it just keeps Superman from getting killed. It DOES stop Juggernaut from beating him. Therefore, Juggernaut cannot beat Superman. You'll have to excuse me for being repetitive, but it seems as though most of you are missing some really obvious points... There's more to fighting than punching, which is the only thing that Juggernaut can do to Superman. Except he can't, because Superman can dodge his punches at superspeed. Superman CAN beat Juggernaut because Juggernaut's power is not infinite, and therefore would not survive being thrown into the sun by Superman (who can hold his breath in outer space). He is also not very smart, so Superman could easily trick him into some sort of trap. Juggernaut has no way of beating Superman. Superman has about 10 ways he could beat Juggernaut. The clostest real-world example I can think of to illustrate what I'm talking about would be having a tank battle an F-16. Of course the F-16 would win. Its faster and has a better arsenal. Sure, the tank MIGHT be able to get a lucky shot in, but the chances of that happening are pretty low.

I'd like to know what a curriculum or test over intelligent design would look like. It seems to me like it would only have one question, and that one question would probably be true or false. Here's my question about intelligent design - does it just cover judeo-christian creationist beliefs? Or is it a more broad study of different creation myths / beliefs to analyze whether an intelligent creative force is possible? That's the problem. No ID advocate has ever put forward exactly what it was they think should be taught. They simply complain evolution gets taught unchallenged, but never really explain what the ID theory encompasses or what factual information can be taught along side their theory to support it. 9/10 of the time, ID advocates use the Bible to support their views, rather than alternate theories which can be supported with measurable evidence. If ID advocates want to be taken seriously, people pushing it really need to offer something to support their theory than criticisms of evolution. So far, ID is a theory which relies on negative proof rather than offering something instead.

Only if Victor Garber plays Bruce Wayne. That motherfucker was a hardcore badass during the first 2 seasons of "Alias".

Why should CM Punk care if she's smokes? He'll be already broken up with her DECADES before she gets cancer and dies from it.

Oh, really...?

I'm gonna need some convincing before I say this is more fucked up than 2002.

Don't feel bad. That show might've been great...if they hadn't fucked up every single character.

Here ya go.

The Undertaker has been stale since 1996.

I'd like to know what a curriculum or test over intelligent design would look like. It seems to me like it would only have one question, and that one question would probably be true or false.

A few things for you to consider: 1. Learn how to spell. 2. Learn how to use apostrophes. 3. Saying someone has to be one of multiple things (i.e. "a slack-jawed idiot or an overly sensitive jackass") because they disagree with you is a pretty pathetic way of backing up your complete lack of a convincing argument. 4. The comparison of a number within a whole to a whole would be considered a ratio. In your case, you said "have more bad eggs than other nations because of sheer numbers and recruiting methods". You were comparing an unspecified amount of "bad eggs" to the number of people within a given nation or nation's military. Perhaps if you understood how to use the English language, you would know that WORD MEAN THINGS and that if you're going to use words to make accusation you better be able to back it up with more than pathetic name calling. If you want to say that the American military isn't the "best or brightest soldier for soldier" and that "for every group of brave and skilled soldiers there's some slack-jawed idiots who think they're in a cowboy movie" (which judging by the way you worded it, you are making a ratio of 1:1, by the way). Spare me your sad stereotypes masquarading as facts. You simply do not know what you are talking about, and have nothing you can actually back up with anything other than your own misbegotten opinion.

Here's what I've been able to figure out: -If Vince is in the ring with a heel, then he's a face. -If Vince is in the ring with a face, he's a heel.

How 'bout no.

Thanks for reminding me. The replay's on in an hour.

I thought he said WWWF.

I'm calling it: Vince vs. HBK at WM22.

Wow. Vince thinks were idiots. Surprise, surprise.

In fairness, that announce table and monitors were in on the screwjob finish.

This commercial's making "Blow" look better than I remember it being.

Vince's DVD review with 10 minutes left in the show? This...can't end well.

I had to spend a week in the hospital after I bought my last cell phone.