SuperJerk

I was asking what my hating you has to do with my teaching of children. You never explained. So, essentially, we're talking about what YOU were talking about.

Translation: No, I really can't explain what I meant either. Yes, that is exactly what I was implying about you. That ranks right up there with "I know you are but what am I?"

They have those problems because the system is too flawed to work on its own. Rather than allowing it to fall, Communist leaders do bad things to prop the system up. That makes them no different than any other government that has outstayed its welcome. Hardly a fair comparison since 90% of your governments throughout history seem to also have a "total suppression of opposition and slaughtering of opponents" problem. Now...let's bring this back to... Okay, I have no fucking clue how we got to this point in the conversation. Aren't we supposed to be talking about gays? I guess its related since most of Mike's posts have been very gay. OMFG BURN~!!!!!1111

I notice you still haven't explained what you meant. I wonder why...

Translation: No, I really can't explain what I meant either.

The governemnt style isn't what killed those people, it was the evil people in charge of it who had those people killed. The only evil which communism inherently condones is the confiscation of property (which they would rationailze is not evil at all). Sorry those distinctions seem to be casualties of your desire to blanket the world with broad generalizations.

Would that be Part 938270392487509834750989? Or just a continuation of Part 938270392487509834750988? I'm torn.

I had to read this again. Its so...perfect.

**cough**rip-off**cough** Please stop stealing my jokes.

I fail to see what one has to do with the other. Well, logical comparisons are clearly not a strong suit of yours... Mike, if its so obvious, then you should have no trouble explaining. That's the kind of thing the Nuremberg laws bring about. -=Mike Mike dismisses something off hand, then runs away without actually disproving it, Part 938270392487509834750988.

OMFG NAZI COMPARISON~!!!!!!!!!11111 If someone's a Communist, it just means they subscribe to an outdated and disproven economic theory, not that they're a bad person.

^Nice dodge.^ Mike dismisses something off hand, then runs away without actually disproving it, Part 938270392487509834750987.

Because with news stations like CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN (Ceretinaly Not News) and Fox is far superior than any other nation TV news networks. Because no US network outside of CBS has so utterly thrown their towel behind a specific candidate. And once again, Mike misreads what I just posted. Join the fucking club.

I fail to see what one has to do with the other. Well, logical comparisons are clearly not a strong suit of yours... Mike, if its so obvious, then you should have no trouble explaining.

I would venture to guess that the great vast majority of the world's Muslims have never committed such an act. Like I said, there are parts to Islam which I deplore, but that doesn't make it a "death cult" or "only about death".

Muhhamed did not condone violence towards Christians or Jews. Too bad Muslims don't listen to him... Some didn't, but many did.

And yet there you sit, DAY AFTER DAY, trying to convince me that you're right. Its as if you need my approval or something. Nah. You can keep thinking that, though. I will keep thinking that because its true. If you have such a low opinion of me, then what does that say about you that you would waste so much time debating me? I may hate you, but I acknowledge you're a smart guy. You just use your intellect to go out of your way to come to the wrong conclusion about things. Its actually rather entertaining to watch. I keep thinking I have something undisputable that'll shut you up (such as welfare statistics, the actual meaning of the Ten Commandments, stats about the Reagan tax hike, proof that Kerry's shipmates supported his candidacy), but then you go and completely get the wrong conclusion. You're quite imaginative, and I'll admit that I enjoy trying to guess what bizarre irrationailty you'll use to justify another of your half-baked, right-wing opinions.

Muhhamed did not condone violence towards Christians or Jews.

And yet there you sit, DAY AFTER DAY, trying to convince me that you're right. Its as if you need my approval or something.

I fail to see what one has to do with the other.

Well, at least now he's offending EVERYBODY.

It's not anti-gay sentiment. It's just random people being evil. You can't blame homophobia. -=Mike ...Man, the justifications for the cult of Death work on EVERYTHING... Homophobia has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. Islam does. There's the difference. Homophobia kills a shitload fewer people. So, it's actually less harmful than Islam. Wow. -=Mike This is ridiculously flawed logic, I hope you're just saying this to try to sound clever and you don't honestly believe this to be a legitimate way of thinking? To recap, Mike's central thesis lately has been that Islam is a "death cult" and has no redeeming qualities whatsoever. Read more about it here.

Actually, we decided we were arguing over semanitics, rather than substance. And it was on a completely different thread. No, you're not, because he's actually reasonable.

Were they the only two, you might be correct. However, the Reagan era is hottly debated amongst historians, and there really is no overwelming consensus of opinion on what role Reagan played. That is not to invalidate your belief, excpet (as you yet) you have not shared what your belief is. I'm willing to look past the fact that I hate you and recognize you are an intelligent person who may have an insightful point of view on the topic. I'm simply asking you to expand on what you believe about Reagan's Cold War policies, in an attempt to more clearly define why you think he deserve the credit you give him.

Do you realize that Slapnuts and I already settled that argument...almost an hour ago...on a completely different thread?