Jump to content

SuperJerk

Members
  • Posts

    9706
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SuperJerk

  1. No no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no. No.
  2. All I know is that I laughed my ass off non-stop both times I viewed it. That makes it a good comedy in my book. The first time was in a packed theater, where the laughter was so widespread it drowned out some of the dialogue. There's probably large groups of people who didn't get where the humor was coming from, but I've known enough guys in my life who acted like Napoleon (to varying degress) that I found the parody dead-on. Besides, if you didn't laugh when the farmer shot the cow in front of the school bus, you just don't have a sense of humor.
  3. The really question is: Which former friend will Triple H feud with NEXT summer (culminating in a HIAC match)?
  4. A lot of ideas got scrapped when Lucas opted just to do 6. Of course, if you read "Star Wars: The Annotated Screenplays", you quickly discover how much better the final filmed versions are than early drafts.
  5. Someone just won the "Mr. Mexico" Pageant. Grand prize: You get to leave Mexico.
  6. Is there some sort of rule that says that Triple H has to spend the summer having a crappy fued with a former friend? This is the 4th fucking year in a row, and the 3rd to involve a HIAC match.
  7. Bump. My memory's a little hazy, but I think that's true. People have mentioned it many times before, but wrestling-titles.com lists Flair as a 19-time world champion (9 NWA Heavyweight titles, 8 WCW Heavyweight titles and 2 WWF Heavyweight titles, with the phantom Jack Veneno title switch not included). Surely Flair knows the number of titles he has won, or at the very least, somebody in WWE has researched the true number. Why does WWE insist on referring to him as 'only' a 16-time world champion ? About Flair becoming champion another time: Please, no. Flair has said in interviews that he's won more than 16, but that 16 is the official number. There were several title changes on non-televised tours (Flair would win the title back a few nights later in a different city) that never got counted in the official count.
  8. I'm so there...tomorrow.
  9. This guy complains about the Senate's inability to handle the invasion of Naboo, but fails to mention the invasion was secretly orchestrated by Senator Palpatine in a plot to make himself chancellor. The separatists movement was, again, orchestrated by Palpatine in a successful attempt to get more power for himself. The real question isn't whether the Empire is better than the Republic, but whether or not the Republic could have healed itself if not for Palpatine's secret scheming. Remember, before Palpatine came along, there hadn't been a full scale war since the founding of the Republic.
  10. WHEN are those screenings?
  11. I'm not in favor of shooting illegal immigrants...but your catapult idea is intriguing.
  12. If I got a vote, it'd be to keep Edge and Lita as far away from each other on TV as possible.
  13. If Laci Peterson wasn't so photogenic nobody outside of her neighbourhood would have given a fuck. But...but...but...she was Connor's mother!!!!!
  14. I'd say your assessment its pretty accurate.
  15. I feel SOOOO no-sold Rob E Dangerously and NoCalMike are being HHHeld down. IllustriousOne's post when he locked that thread (in which he explains the Mike/ban situation) was the greatest thing in the history of Monday Nitro and colorfully illustrates everything that's right about America.
  16. Have you read C-Bacon's posts? And Mike only starting dissing Islam recently in that one thread. And no I don't think C-Bacon should be banned either. My understanding of C-Bacon is that he only bashes the American GOVERNMENT for actions he disagrees with. Mike called every Muslim on the planet someone who worships death. Slight difference.
  17. You've got me confused with EricMM.
  18. I plan on behaving myself. edit: And I actually LIKE reading posts from kkk, Czech, and Stephen Joseph.
  19. Well you did start it. So technically you flame baited him and he flamed you back. Yes, quoting Mike = flame-baiting Mike. Good call. If he took that as a flame, then maybe he shouldn't have posted those things in the first place.
  20. Also, Bob, let's be clear about one other thing. For about a week, I posted some of Mike's more insane quotes in my sig in an attempt to draw attention to his...lack of discretion. His response was the put the following quote in his sig: "Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach." If THAT isn't flame-baiting, nothing is.
  21. Mike was NOT the victim of my flaming. The flame wars I had with him were ALWAYS started by a personal insult made by him towards me. I guess all the times he flamed me first (which was ALL THE TIME) was pre-emptive strike or something? Let's be clear on what flaming is: Flaming is personal attacks and name-calling. I may have disputed Mike's claims, and pointed out how I thought his posts showed poor reasoning, but when it came to actually getting down and making ad hominem attacks, Mike was always the aggressor.
  22. credit: http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/e...es/11562618.htm
  23. **Reads entire thread.** Please note that 95% of the bitching about me (i.e. the Nazi comparison when discussing proposed laws that discriminate against gays) was over something I did once. Its no secret that I despise MikeSC. I'm not really proud that I sunk to his level and flamed him back. However, my attitude towards him was purely retaliatory. In fact, a few months ago I even tried to make peace with him after he won an argument I was having with him. That last about 3 weeks before he started flaming me again. Things got REALLY heated when I posted evidence (actual government statistics) that contradicted his claims that welfare made poverty worse. He argued with me for DAYS, insulting me at every turn, for having the gall to contradict his "obvious" conclusion. Then, just a couple of weeks ago, I made my infamous Nazi Germany comparison which inspired Czech to start this very thread. Of course the Conservative Brigade rallied against me, and suddenly I was the most hated man in the CE folder. I did not back down, though, because I did not feel that my comment was completely without merit. The Texas/Nazi Germany thing was a one time only thing. I have not, before or since, compared anyone or anything to Nazi Germany. Just as that controversy finally started to die down, Mike goes and calls Islam a "death cult". This wasn't just factually inaccurate, but also offensive, and I stood up against him by attempting to show the error in his reasoning. This, of course, led to more flames (on both sides) rather than intelligent discussion. I'm not proud of my behavior, and I do understand that I'm on borrowed time. However, I'm fully intent on followng the rules from now on.
  24. To clarify: I only flamed Slapnuts! in response to his stating that it was okay for Mike to flame people based on the grounds "If you can't take the heat, get out of the CE folder." I was trying to get him to see that it wasn't okay. Well, he reacted quite negatively to my flame (suggesting that I should be banned myself), thus nullifying his previous argument that flaming in the CE folder is an okay thing to do.
  25. GREAT MOMENTS IN HOWARD DEAN HISTORY Booker Dean
×
×
  • Create New...