Jack_Bauer

His tag matches against Jericho and Christian with Goldust were some really good matches. Triple H's only good matches recently have been 1) HBK and 2) Elimination Chamber.

Hmm, I now have Bret Hart v 1-2-3 Kid. Can I just say how much that match rules.

I reckon that Kurt Angle v Chris Benoit from Royal Rumble 2003 was over ****.

Totally true. Paul London has went out and had great matches in ROH with practically everyone he has faced. Micheal Shane, Spanky, Samoa Joe, AJ Styles ( which was one of the best matches I have ever seen in ROH ), and then went to TNA and had a great match with Chris Sabin. As for Low Ki, I reckon that guy is world class. He proved his class time and time again in ROH. American Dragon is my fave worker in the US right now though, because recently, I have watched his matches with Low Ki and with AJ Styles, and they were better than most of the matches I have seen from any wrestler so far this year.

I'd take Bob Backlund over Triple H right now. I USED to like Triple H, but he just ain't good anymore. Give me the Triple H from 2000/2001, and I would not be complaining one bit about him having any titles. Problem is, it has become REALLY hard to get a good match out of him. At least Booker T can be carried to a really good match.

This must be 2nd most ridiculous post behind 'BAN 1 INCH !'

The thing is, I just don't think Benoit is that great anymore. Last year, I would have said Benoit is better, but he seems to be just getting worse.

Someone that likes something is hardly gonna call it bad, and that's the point. So, if someone dislikes Benoit, do you honestly expect them to fo out and call them a great wrestler, just because most people see it as fact. Don't get me wrong, I think Benoit is awesome.

But according to Ray, that wasn't a good match. No matter what your opinion of it is. That is the point. Some people like some things more than others.

Sometimes, people don't know WHY they like something better. For some reason, I like HHH v HBK 2/3 Falls. Why ? I dunno, but there was just SOMETHING that dragged me in.

If HHH gave a shit, he would have let Booker win.

Problem is, no-one would have a POINT for that opinion. If someone was to say A-Train is a better wrestler than Kurt Angle I wouldn't go and say 'YOURE WRONG !' I think the perfect postition for this is Haas is better than Benoit, because Haas isn't bad, and people may like his style more than Benoits.

I don't watch TNA so I guess I'm safe. Put it this way, the only people that ever get pulled up for it, is people that disagree with the majority of people.

In that case go to the TNA forum. And you'll see WHY he gets pulled up for it.

Case in point : Dave O'Neill, Journalist. The only other person I have seen pulled up for this. How many people dislike that guy ?

Seriously, I have made about a million mistakes on this site and have not been pulled up. Why ? Basically, people don't dislike my opinion.

Hey, here's an idea. Lets let someone have an opinion when they state that it's only their opinion. On the 'being right', NO opinion is right, basically because IT'S AN OPINION !

OK, how can I object to poor typing leading to a ban.

you swear what ?

HHH is better than some of the guys on RAW just now, and their COULD be worse I suppose. I guess I just expect HHH to win the title, cant do anything about it.

I apologize for not showing Dave's post in full in my quote, as he was completely right.

Well, so far, has the event been good ? Remember my friend is relying on my money.

You may not like this, but I love Batista now for some reason. I guess he isn't as boring as he used to be. I guess Dave O'Neill deserves an apology. I guess he's good after all.

how many users did it have, and what do you search for when you search for this kinda stuff

Tell me if Sonjay Dutt v Chad Collyer is good. That match with 15 mins ( which I know it won't get ) would be amazing.