Crimson G

No, Todd Bridges orchestrated that clusterfuck of a schmoz after the match, remember? And he jumping elbowed a standing dude (Butterbean?) in the back before getting the beat up and made to look like a punk. And I disagree on the girls thing. Trishelle was pretty decent. The rest sucked big time, but at least Erin was trying. The thing that bothered me the most was they'd all take like 3 hours between moves posing and "working" the crowd. Is that what they really think wrestling is like? It's too bad someone like Tazz isn't there to kick their asses the next day for pulling some amateur bullshit like that. We instead have to deal with Beefcake and Knobbs training these people. That's a surefire path to greatness. Also, I laughed pretty hard when the Hulkster talked about all the agility he had to utilize in the ring.

He would still be over huge if they gave him the f'ing mic every once in a while. The crowd seemed to love him speaking, whether heel or face he really drew heat. They just turned him into a jobber because he was so damn good at putting other people over with his ring work. He's really a solid performer and I hope he gets one last push sometime soon.

He's a ghost, not a vampire.

The Rocky & Bullwinkle opening. Brings back many wonderful memories (of both shows.)

And I only have the slightest inkling of who she's parodying. I think she's a fashion designer. The best stuff I can think of out of Sanz was the "Taco Hole" song and his Gene Shalit, and neither of them are very good. "Stop screaming science, you moron!" Hilarious. I can't believe you guys hate the Donatella sketch. It's been probably the best recurring character of the past decade on SNL with the Night at the Roxbury guys coming in a close second.

Eugene seemed to like receiving it as a gift, so I assume their target demographic is retards with cash to blow. (Or, I suppose, people pretending to be retards who hang out with heat-magnets that weren't even able to wrestle well during their prime in the 80's.)

Pretty sucky Raw except for the McMahons ruling the place while beating up 75% of the retards on the roster. (That would be a great gimmick in itself! Sneak attacking people like Snitsky and the Highlanders, just for cheap heat. All the while taunting them with their ability to not stand out in regular society as someone mentally handicapped.) Side note: Did anyone else wish for an Eric Bischoff/3MW appearance when Edge told the guy he had "3 minutes" to get the champagne? It would've been awesome if Eric showed up as the manager of the hotel and did the 3MW schtick.

That took place in WCW.

Who the hell's Ricky Johnson?

When Admiral Piett dies some people just won't be able to handle it. See: the Piett dossier. (http://www.piett.org/piett/dossier.html)

Harlem heat were pushed as brothers.

No, he's the NWA World Champ. TNA has control over their "world-level" titles per their contract with the NWA.

Edit: My first double post ever. Sorry about that.

I think it's yearly.

Another huge update. Primarily gaijins. Steamboat didn't use Rydeen (that's someone else), although he did use a tune by YMO called "Tong Poo." And, for anyone that needs to know the Orchestral version of the UWF Main Theme is on the NJPW 30th Anniversary Album. The regular version is on PuroresuQ.

Huge update. (Mostly gaijins.) Thanks for the info Indikator and, yes, it is a very long & tiring process. I hope to post a list for each of the major promotions (throughout puroresu history.) I'm working on Zero-One right now, but there's very little listed anywhere.

Updated.

Updated.

Hmm, that's bizarre. I forgot to upload it before. Anyway, here it is: Kaz Hayashi 1st/Ultimo Dragon 1st - Temple of the Dragon Yeah. That Johnny Swinger thing was a mistake. I actually don't have his 2nd theme.

Dreamer's version was the NY State equivalent of the US Title, if I recall.

That's what the Nitro Girls were called at a German WCW PPV.

First of all, let me say that, if you want to box my beliefs into a corner, I am a Absolute Monarchist who believes in the Rule of Law and who is moderate with libertarian tendencies. I know, a lot of (seemingly) contradictory statements there, but that's me. Abortion: Abortion, including morning-after pills, is murder. You're attempting to kill a living organism that will develop into a human because of selfish reasons. I am leaning towards including victims of rape and incest in this, too. I have no idea what to do when the health of the mother is at stake because that really depends on whether the health of the child is at stake. If the child is going to survive and the mother has a good chance of dying, I would birth the child. If the child and mother are both equally threatened, I wouldn't have any idea what to do. Affirmative Action: Affirmative action is racism, pure and simple. It's especially evident in the NFL and it's a joke. I don't want to have anything to do with racism. Do away with it. Campaign Finance: I don't support democratic elections and "Campaign Finance" is one system that helps make that decision much easier. Elections are essentially bought in this country. If your views do not fit into a certain frame (i.e. a political party supported stance), then you have no chance of winning unless you are some sort of celebrity that's not a complete and utter joke of a candidate. Campaign Finance legally allows the rich of this country to control an election to a ridiculous degree. It's bribery, pure and simple. But... we can't be rid of it in ouor present system. Death Penalty: I'm undecided on this. I used to support the death penalty, but now I'm not so sure of its deterring capabilities. I think rather than focusing on this issue, the American government should look into reforming the prison system. There's so much wrong with what goes on in prison that it probably hardens prisoners more toward their criminal ways rather than rehabilitates them which I believe has become, and rightfully so, the purpose of imprisoning someone. Drugs: If alcohol and tobacco are legal, then marijuana should be legal. If they are not legal, then marijuana should not be either. Other "hard" drugs are not even a question; they should definitely be illegal. Fighting the "war on drugs" should be a matter of foreign policy since Colombia and other such places should not allow the substances that they do allow to be grown there. If they want to allow the American military into this one, then I'd support a war there. I don't know how one would feasibly work, however, other than looking like a military occupation. Evolutionism/Creationism: I'm a supporter of creationism, but I don't necessarily think that has to exclude evolutionism. Microevolution is evident to everyone, but macroevolution is harder to prove and is wrought with hoaxes perpetrated by scientists. I think the big bang theory can work in a creationism environment, as well. Because of my religious beliefs (I believe God is our Creator), I cannot hold anything outside of those views, but I can hold anything within that framework. Evolutionism can work within that framework. Now, as to whether this should be taught in schools. Clearly, both theories because they can both account for the way things are presently (biologically) should be taught. They should not be taught as mutually exclusive, however, since they are not mutually exclusive. Foreign Policy: This is a big one. I don't believe the United States should be involved in dictating foreign policy to another country, except for arguing for or against an issue with them on a one-on-one basis. The United Nations is a joke and is devoted to forcing someone's opinion on someone else. Countries should be dealt with on a country-to-country basis, alliances are negative to a global environment. Always do what's right, never what's in our best interest (except when that is also right), and defend your positions as being the right thing to do. I could go on forever on this topic, but I won't. Free Speech: See religion. Gay Rights: Homosexuals should have the same rights, as you or I. This, however, does not extend to marriage as a religious rite (though this is a religious issue, not a political one.) "Marriage" as a state institution, including tax rebates, insurance policies, and whatever else, should be open to homosexuals. However, I honestly don't view this as marriage at all, but rather the State's approval of a given lifestyle. If homosexuality is tolerated, then such "marriages" should be viewed in the same way. Where I would draw the line, however, is at adoption. I do not believe that homosexual couples can raise a child in a proper environment since they lack an appropriate role-model from each gender, however I would say the same thing about single parents, "bad" parents, divorced parents, etc. Gun Control: I support the second amendment, but I think it's being misinterpreted currently. The purpose of the second amendment was that America would be prepared to defend itself should the need arise. However, since America has had a standing army for so long (something the Founding Fathers would most assuredly not approve of, nor would their primary influence John Locke), the need for a militia has been minimal at best. The problem is not with supporting one half of the second amendment (the right to bear arms), the problem is not recognizing the second half of the amendment (that the arms should be used, by the people, to defend the nations from any foreign invaders.) Iraq: The United States did the right thing is removing Saddam Hussein from power. It is not, nor is it currently, doing what I believe is in the best interest of the global community nor the people of Iraq. I believe strongly in national sovereignty and a nation's right to set up its own government. Now, the United States' creation of democracy in Iraq ensures a more stabled (read: controlled) environment in the Middle East, but it doesn't do what's best for the Iraqi people. Only Iraqis know what Iraqis need in their government. Israel: Israel has a right to be a nation. Palestine was never an independent nation. It's people group has not lived there as long as they claim to have. Both groups have supported terrorist tactics, but Israel's seem to be a response to terrorism rather than an assault on the "Palestinian" people. The problem with Israel's tactics is that they don't seem to care about collateral damage which is just inhumane. They should be firmly dealth with on that issue, but their statehood should not be questioned. The Pledge/Prayer: Who really cares about this one? The Pledge of Allegiance is a stupid, non-binding repetition of American propaganda. If someone doesn't want to say the words "under God", then they shouldn't have to, but they also shouldn't force their (lack of) belief upon those who believe otherwise. (I'm conflicted on whether to say the pledge at all because of two problems: 1) what is my duty as a Christian regarding oaths? and 2)why should I support something that's so clearly propaganda anyway?) Prayer in public schools is simple. Prayer can clearly not be compulsory, nor can prayer be stopped. Let someone pray if they want to and if someone doesn't want to pray, don't hold it against them. The problem believed to be in this issue, however, stems from the bizarre belief that Church and State should be separate. I just don't buy it. Religion: Religion is the search for truth in the invisible world. Freedom of Religion should be one of the universally supported issues in a government, as well as the Freedom of Speech. America's duty on this issue is global, however. All men are created with "certain inalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness." I would place freedom of religion high among the liberties that man was created with and that no man may rightfully take away. It's inexcusable to allow people around the world to be persecuted for any religious beliefs that they hold. Now, what constitutes "religion" is an interesting, and, thus far, unsolved, debate that arises out of this. Social Security: Social Security is garbage. People should privately save for their retirement. Compulsory saving leads to the problem we have now: Social Security is not guaranteed for the next generation because it's believed to be just another thing that we can do away with. Social Security has to removed slowly. Term Limits: Term limits are bogus. If someone's doing a good job, let him continue to do a good job. I do not believe that absolute power corrupts absolutely, nor do I believe that power corrupts. It only corrupts if we allow it to do so, but there is nothing inherently wrong with someone controlling something for a long portion of time. Welfare: It's a government's duty to look after it's people. Having said that, I wish we didn't need welfare, but appears to be necessary. Maybe if a large chunk of money is taken out of the military, we will be able to afford to put a lot more money back into the economy.

Here's some stuff I didn't have when I originally posted. Here it is in a handy, separate post. (Credit be to whoever credit is due, I'm simply a collector.) * Barry Windham 9th/West Texas Rednecks 1st - Rap Is Crap * Big Josh 1st/Big Josh & Brad Armstrong 1st - Smokin' Steel Guitar * Chris Benoit 3rd - Replica (Instrumental) * Dale Torborg 1st (Rec.) * Fit Finlay 3rd - Belfast * Bavarian Girls 1st - Hey Baby * Perry Saturn 3rd (Rec.) * Shane Douglas 5th * Silver King 2nd (Rec.)

It's on there. Every known wrestler to have used a theme is listed by every theme name, in alphabetical order (and listed by the first wrestler in the alphabet to use it.) In the case of Temple of the Dragon, I believe Aja Kong & Akira Hokuto are the first listed (alphabetically) to use it.

Desmond Howard maybe? Or was this post-'96?