RavishingRickRudo

Booking and Writing in the WWE often overlap, so knowing wrestling history would help the writer understand the direction the booker is going. On the other hand, I would trust a writer to come up with something original without having to go back to the cliches that wrestling people seem to rely on like Cornette's 'Rock'n'Roll Express' tag team formula and the Dusty Finish. Then you get something "original" like a Porn Star, or a Pimp... original is not necessarily good; and cliches aren't necessarily bad. Hollywood has proven you can work a formula over and over again (coughromanticcomedycoughactionmoviecough) as long as you can do it well. There are plenty of formulas the WWE could use right now that they haven't used effectively in a long time. Besides, if a writer is unfamiliar with wrestling history he might come up with a brilliant idea about a rebellious, beer-drinking, foul-mouthed wrestler fighting an up-tight, corporate, authority figure... *cough* I don't see how not knowing the product you're writing for is a good thing.

Yes, because that is all based on their wrestling... their horrible, horrible, wrestling.

BUT, a writer who knew about *wrestling history* would have a better judgement of what worked and what didn't.

And fuck Fox - they thought Firefly was a fucking comedy.

It's way more honest and doesn't talk down to you

It's like Footloose, but with Buffy and Angel...

I will take crowd noise over JR, King, and Coach.

YEAH~! And I'll borrow it!

And I am one of those.

Joke? Err.. yeah, JOKE. Yeah JOKE. Yeah, I wonder if anyone... if anyone will ge that... that. JOKE. *lowers head shamefully*

Dunno if this has been posted yet, but via The LAW: *Ric Flair collection (January 27th 2004) *The Undertaker: Buries Them Alive (I swear that's the real name of the DVD) January 27th 2004 *Cause Stone Cold Said So: January 27th 2004 *WWE No Mercy: January 27th 2004 *Mick Foley: Hits and Misses (February 24th 2004)

*looks into mirror* Da Dadadada Dadadadadaa dadadadaadadadadadada

Yeah but Mole, you're Amish... *big laugh at boobie flexing*

Torrie doesn't have chemistry with anything. She is the female Lex Luger.

Ok, we've already had this discussion and it led to the only reasonable outcome - Kurt transforms into his Lucha Libre alter-ego "Olympico" and gets a mini.

I usually expect them to say no - since most of them have a desire to get into acting.

Hmph, I've suggested running a 3 man announce team for a while now to ease the transition for a replacement for JR. Of course, I would have prefered someone GOOD in that role... Stupid McMahon.

RHETORICAL QUESTION! It didn't call for an answer you bastards!

Did she really? Like anyone believed her. How catty. Meow. Why wouldn't anyone believe her? - people are allowed to say no; right?

That's what we need, MORE Torrie and Sable - it worked so well the first time. The sexual tension between the two; you could cut it with a knife... sure, it was a butter knife, but it was still thick! *groans* They're going to do a whole feud on this where Torrie says she's posing for playboy, and Sable says she is, and they battle it out to a draw where they BOTH get to be on playboy. Total Amount of Segments: 15 Total Amount of Time Spent: 3 Hours

Torrie said she'd never do it... .......

I bet you do. Still... "... of a fishing boat"

Torrie Wilson has the sex appeal of a fishing boat.

Me, I'm for an Eddie vs. Angle feud. Infact, I wanted this feud back in the Summer/Fall period when Eddie still had momentum on his side. Angle is the only guy who can effectively elevate Eddie up to a Main Event position (that is, to fight in the main event, not to become a Main Eventer). Big Show can't, Benoit can't, Brock is the champ so he's the guy Eddie would be challenging - so that leaves Kurt. But jesus christ, could they book a feud between Kurt and Eddie any worse???

Really, turning out "better" than Torrie and Gail is not really that much of an achievement. Infact, turning out "as good" as the 'best' of the womens division is still pretty fucking bad.