The only reason why Punk's title win doesn't mean something to some people is because their to caught up in WWE's backstage happenings and politics, inestead of being intrested in the story Morrison and Punk have been telling, which has been a damn good one since Morrison won the title.
So lets say, Morrison didn't get suspended and Punk won the title at Unforgiven, would you have thought diffently about it? It was pretty obvious Punk was most likely going to win the title at Unforgiven anyways, so why does this change anything?
Because, to me, this won't come off as the blowoff to the fued, it's just a non-advertised match to get the belt of Morrison. I'm not blaming Punk for this as it's not his fault and it's not really creative's fault either. It just seems to me that they've built up Punk so much for the title win, only to hand it to him because Morrison fucked up. Same goes for Hardy winning the belt of Umaga, it's just WWE hitting the panic button.
I still think Punk should have won at Summerslam. It would have been a much better image.