The one & only War On Terror thread

[Guest MrRant]

Man I need to get in on these conversations you and Tom have.

[Guest Ken]

I think we should attack China.

America doesn't attack anyone who could possibly fight back.

[Guest MrRant]

I think we should attack China.

America doesn't attack anyone who could possibly fight back.

What is your definition of "fight back"? Everyone can fight back.

[Guest Ken]

Fight back: America would not attack anyone who could possibly beat or even compete with them. This goes back to the Vietnam war.

[Guest Ken]

Not to say that isn't an intelligent approach.

[Guest Cancer Marney]

America would not attack anyone who could possibly beat or even compete with them.

We can't attack anyone who could possibly beat or even compete with us. No such country exists.

[Guest MrRant]

Damn you Marney... beat me to it.

[Guest Ken]

America would not attack anyone who could possibly beat or even compete with them.

We can't attack anyone who could possibly beat or even compete with us. No such country exists.

If so why aren't you at war with China?

[Guest Cancer Marney]

Because I'm not the President.

 

Ask a stupid fuckin' question...

[Guest Ken]

Okay then, why hasn't America declared war on China?

[Guest Vern Gagne]

Okay then, why hasn't America declared war on China?

In Due time. Those commies will get what's coming to them.

[Guest RevEvil]

<Marney> "At a news conference on Friday, Daeubler-Gmelin said: "It was terrible to say I had compared a democratically elected president with Hitler.""

<DrTom> Cretin.

<Marney> Of course, Hitler was democratically elected too.

<DrTom> True. <g>

<Marney> And the liberals are still shrilling that President Bush wasn't... so, actually, in that sense he sort of comes out ahead. <g>

Hitler was actually appointed chancellor by the German president. The reichstag approved a bill to give him dictatorial powers.

[Guest Agent of Oblivion]

Why the hell would we attack china?

[Guest Mystery Eskimo]

For their secret recipes.

 

I'd like America to attack Wales, whilst avoiding England, if possible.

[Guest Ken]

Why the hell would we attack china?

I think Marney, being an advocate of this proposal, should field this one.

[Guest danielisthor]

For their secret recipes.

 

I'd like America to attack Wales, whilst avoiding England, if possible.

I couldn't allow that considering my girlfriend's father is welsh, as is both her god parents. And since we are planning on a vacation there next year, it'll have to wait until at least 2004. Sorry.

 

[Guest Cancer Marney]

Okay then, why hasn't America declared war on China?

Because... I'm... not... the... President...

 

Christ, you're one of the dumbest and most humourless fuckheads I've ever seen on any online board, and that's saying something.

[Guest Cancer Marney]

I'd like America to attack Wales, whilst avoiding England, if possible.

Don't worry, Daniel, Eskimo's request is a no can do. It'd just look too silly. I mean we could make a case for attacking England, because there are actually more than three million people there, but Wales? There's no point. Besides, I love the countryside, and Cardiff is much, much prettier than London.

[Guest Mystery Eskimo]

There is a point. It'd kill all the Welsh people!

 

War on Britain as a whole is more likely though.

 

Blair: The people of the USA and Great Britain have always shared a special bond.

Bush: We'd like you to prove your obedience, subservience, and general ass kissing abilities. You are now the 51st state of the USA.

Blair: Um...er...

Bush: Release the winged monkeys!

[Guest Cancer Marney]

52nd state, you mean. Canada's already the 51st.

[Guest danielisthor]

Isreal could be number 53 and Puerto Rico 54.

[Guest Spaceman Spiff]

The problem w/ attacking China is, 1 hour after we win, we'd want to attack again. ::rimshot::

[Guest meanmaisch]

Yes, but with two attacks, we would get an egg roll.

[Guest MrRant]

This is almost as bad as France

[Guest DeputyHawk]

This is almost as bad as France

bigot.

[Guest MrRant]

This is almost as bad as France

bigot.

Yeah yeah... I know.

[Guest Vern Gagne]

Iran should be after Iraq. They're harboring Al Qaeda terrorist and the religious zealots need to taken care of.

[Guest Ken]

Iran should be after Iraq. They're harboring Al Qaeda terrorist and the religious zealots need to taken care of.

Here we go again.....

[Guest Cancer Marney]

I'm not so sure about Iran anymore. Things are moving over there. They most certainly are harbouring terrorists and religious zealots, but I'm willing to give their president a little latitude and a little more time. He genuinely is trying to change things - witness the new constitutional amendment being bruited about this week. He has a decent record, too. It's just the Council of Guardians that's holding him and the people back.

[Guest Vern Gagne]

The Council of Guardians is who I was more or less refering to in Iran. Whoever the President is at least trying to modernize Iran but until the religious leaders are out of power nothing can really change.