Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Report post Posted June 17, 2003 It's funny, because Johnson is still dodging my question. I answered your question. If it wasn't the answer you wanted then tough. You'll live. "Your question is irrelevant. I loved the Horsemen". The above quote was your answer when I called you out the first time. Do you call that a fucking answer? If you wanna bitch-out on this one, fine. Do so. But don't avoid the question entirely. I answered your question throughout this thread with my post. Learn to read and you might just understand my answer. But if you'd like to repeat the question I'd me more then happy to answer it again for the mentally challenged. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Lord of The Curry Report post Posted June 18, 2003 Consider me mentally retarded then. So please, pretty please with sugar on top, repeat your answer. How was the finish of the match "Classic"? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted June 18, 2003 Will you two bitches take this thing elsewhere? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Report post Posted June 18, 2003 I loved the Horsemen. I realize that a copy would be shit. But I do realize that the Evolution could be a great tribute to the Horsemen and also add some good fueds to the current WWE, making the shows more interesting again. Now, I am hoping that this is the angel they are going with this. If I am wrong, then I am wrong. But I can hope. There LOTC, happy now. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Lord of The Curry Report post Posted June 18, 2003 I think you're confused. There's a difference between "tribute" and "attempt at being better". HHH wants to be better then Flair. He wants Evolution to be better then the Horsemen. If you think Evolution will improve things on Raw.......oh man.......there's no hope for you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest nWoScorpion Report post Posted June 18, 2003 Bad Blood wasn' THAT bad I don't think. Sure the Redneck Triatholon was crap, but everything else was watchable. HIAC was better than I DREAMED it would be. HBK/Flair was around ***, if only it had more time and more old school wrestling, instead of TABLE spots. Jericho/Gold-turd goes into the same category as HHH/Nash. Test/Steiner was fairly decent for who was in it. ditto Dudleyz/Mack&Nowinski. Only thing TRULY BAD wrestling wise was maybe Kane & RVD v. La Resistance. KING OF THE RING = STILL Worst PPV EVER; not getitng one match above **. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gert T 0 Report post Posted June 18, 2003 I will still agree that Road Wild 98 was the worst, but onto this show, although I agree that Austin-Bischoff was put on to boost PPV orders, it was pointless, especially when 3 of the people watching the show with me asked, "so what does this mean, is Austin the sole GM now? The matches as a whole were not bad, but I think other's suggestions of 2 hour brand only PPV's looks better after Bad Blood. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted June 18, 2003 Please Road Wild 1998 was better then Uncensored 1995 if only for the images of Bikers falling asleep... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Adam 0 Report post Posted June 18, 2003 All I know is I had to resort to yelling obscenities at my TV while watching Bad Blood, and I actually HOPED that Kane was coming out in the main event. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest thetrendsetter Report post Posted June 18, 2003 Bad Blood wasn't the greatest of PPV's ever, but as far as Ratio of how the estimate of how good the PPV was going to be compared to how good it turned out, this was Great American Bash 89 in comparison. Trips/Nash was a brawl, and a pretty good one at that. Sorry you fanboys couldn't have been pleased by somebody going off the cell, or taking a sick bump, heaven forbid they actually worked, rather than taking a bump (Waiting 15 minutes to make sure the guy taking the bump is alive) another huge bump (10 minute wait) than a 5 minute match. That said, The HIAC match had nothing on two of the better ones (Michaels/Taker, 6-Man) Nash/HHH > Foley/Taker I personally didn't like Flair/Michaels, was okay. But there was nothing spectacular about it, and should have been given the 22-25 minutes it deserved. The table bump also didn't look that great. Jericho/Goldberg was alright, Goldberg needs a hotter comeback than Spear ---> Jackhammer... Test/Steiner was passable save the opening fuck-up. Test finally started showing potential as a heel, and got probably the best match out of steiner since his return. Redneck Triathlon served it's purpose as the fans were into it. This show was far from the worst Pay-Per-View ever... and i see people bashing Johnson1620 because the matches were "okay", "passable", "exceeding expectations"... Hey, he's not claiming it's the Best PPV ever, but some of you are claiming it's the worst. He doesn't have to prove it was great, just better than others. Bad Blood was the 3rd best WWF PPV this year (Besides WM19 and The Rumble) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Grand Pubah of 1620 Report post Posted June 18, 2003 I think you're confused. There's a difference between "tribute" and "attempt at being better". HHH wants to be better then Flair. He wants Evolution to be better then the Horsemen. If you think Evolution will improve things on Raw.......oh man.......there's no hope for you. IMO, they have already improved things on RAW. Whenever you have a good stable, which they'll have after next week, the storylines are better and the fueds are better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest ISportsFan Report post Posted June 18, 2003 Trips/Nash was a brawl, and a pretty good one at that. Sorry you fanboys couldn't have been pleased by somebody going off the cell, or taking a sick bump, heaven forbid they actually worked, rather than taking a bump (Waiting 15 minutes to make sure the guy taking the bump is alive) another huge bump (10 minute wait) than a 5 minute match. That said, The HIAC match had nothing on two of the better ones (Michaels/Taker, 6-Man) Nash/HHH > Foley/Taker I agree, except Jericho/HHH was better (although that wasn't exactly great either) and HHH/Foley was about ****1/2 at No Way Out 2000. It was also worse than UT/Brock. Basically, this one was only better than UT/Bossman and UT/Mankind. Jason Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Detective Comics 0 Report post Posted June 18, 2003 IMO, they have already improved things on RAW. Whenever you have a good stable, which they'll have after next week, the storylines are better and the fueds are better. I think I can agree with you here, however, I don't see Evolution as a great stable. They really have no point working together, and bringing up Jindrak who would be a no name guy to most WWE fans isn't going to get a big reaction. So you've got 3 decent guys, Flair, and all 4 are stale. Eh.... I'm not buying it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Just John 0 Report post Posted June 18, 2003 Come on now. Bad Blood certainly was a terrible show ,but not the worst ever. You still have KOTR (95 or 99), Uncensored (95, 96, or 99), any Road Wild event, and most 1999 WCW ppv's. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Retro Rob Report post Posted June 18, 2003 Come on now. Bad Blood certainly was a terrible show ,but not the worst ever. You still have KOTR (95 or 99), Uncensored (95, 96, or 99), any Road Wild event, and most 1999 WCW ppv's. And Backlash and Judgment of this year... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Choken One Report post Posted June 18, 2003 those were just utterly forgettable...while those legendary stinkers have something to remember bout it... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
