Cherry Blossom Viscount 0 Report post Posted July 11, 2003 Barron, you're a vulture. You seem to randomly attack anyone who has fallen out of favor. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest SP-1 Report post Posted July 11, 2003 It was directed at those who had posted the, "Sits back and eats some popcorn" comments, Bob. Not literal. Maybe you should have dug a little deeper and read my post a little better there. Did you miss the, "Carry On," at the end? Sorry for thinking you'd be able to pick that up. You're a cronie, Bob. A sidekick. If you're going to flame me, do it on your own time and not on the coattails of Marney's marvelous accomplishment. Start your own thread, stand on your own legs, and maybe, just maybe, your bandwagon opinion will gain some credibility with me. Good day. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Jobber of the Week Report post Posted July 11, 2003 You're a flaming idiot. Shut the fuck up, leave your Galahad complex at the window and drive through, thank you. Whiny little prat. Fuck off and take your inane condescension and infantile allegories with you. However, you've been ruling this thread, so I'll throw in: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheZsaszHorsemen Report post Posted July 12, 2003 Bob: Could you fit your entire body up Marney's ass? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Your Paragon of Virtue 0 Report post Posted July 12, 2003 I too believe that God isn't the type toe get personally involved in our earthly matters, I don't remember what the term was. I also feel that I shouldn't shit on someone who feels differently, because it's normal for one to turn to prayer in times of need. It sort of pisses me off when people exploit God and Jesus to help them with their daily problems and downplay their significance, but they have a different set of beliefs than I, so I won't chastize them for it. Unless he brought that up in argument I don't think that you should criticize him for it. If you don't mind me asking, what was the cause for you to become atheist, and to revert back? Correct me if I'm wrong here, but you're essentially saying that you felt that we are not saved by Jesus in a supernatural sense, but just by his example of death? Are you trying to say that we should follow him by example, as opposed to believing that he did hold some supernatural power in bearing our sins? In a sense, does that mean that you are straying from the basic concept that he is the Son of God, or just the concept that he died for our sins? That's a pretty challenging statement to make. Okay, now you're REALLY confusing me. Jesus was unjustly put to death, would that make him more wretched than Pilate or any of those guys? I agree with you on the hell thing. Personally, I don't believe there is a hell because if God is all-understanding, than he should be able to comprehend all the problems that one has which causes them to do such wrongful things. Thus, that would make him imperfect and petty. The argument should end there really. Reason + Faith = I know a moral mUslIm man who is a better person than I, and I couldn't imagine him burning in hell while I get to live in "eternal bliss". I also agree that the Old Testament is fairly useless, BUT the Four Gospels are excellent, credible sources of the life of Jesus. I don't understand the reasons as to why people bash them so much, and if they did a little research instead of using "logic", than they'd see that the Gospels are pretty damn good as far as biographies of Jesus go. "But at least they aren't literally selling the Pope's shit anymore." *Scratches head* Reply coming later tonight or early tomorrow. I've still got to get through sixteen briefing papers today. Just wanted to explain that last line and repost the rest so you'd know I'd be getting to them - I'm enjoying the conversation. Anyway, the thing about the Pope's shit - the Catholic church actually saved it, dried it, wrapped it in gold foil and sold it as indulgences in the middle ages. I don't have a reference with me right now but I'll find it before my next reply. I look forward to hearing it, and while selling the pope's shit may elicit a response of "What the hell are you thinking?", the selling of days off in purgatory during the middle ages is even more disgusting, as it's insulting to think that the richer you are, the better off you are in the afterlife. But I'm sure we all knew that already Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheZsaszHorsemen Report post Posted July 12, 2003 It's a bit unfair to use examples from the Middle Ages. The Catholic Church doesn't even use indulgances anymore, much less the Pope's shit. The Middle Ages was the darkest period of man's history since Cavemen times as knowledge and expanding the mind. It's called "The Dark Age" for a reason, you know. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rising up out of the back seat-nuh 0 Report post Posted July 12, 2003 If you are to deny someone the right to express their religious views, then you must in turn be prepared to pass the same judgement upon those who oppose them. You're a flaming idiot. Have I banned him? No. I can't. Criticism does not equal persecution. Shut the fuck up, leave your Galahad complex at the window and drive through, thank you. If an atheist came onto this board, and said "there is no God: fact" would you flame them? Nope. Can't be disproved. The quote you just made appears to say "Christians are dumb, therefore anything they say deserves to be ridiculed" whilst taking a superior attitude towards Christians as an atheist. You can't read. The quoted passage says clearly that opinions are not immune to criticism simply because they are opinions about religion. To call [sP] up on it, and not the dozens of people on this board who are atheists (such as myself) reeks of persecution. Fucking shut up already. I don't know why the hell you think posting a mean message to someone is "persecution." Whiny little prat. Also, what's with the quote? If they are your views, express them in your own words, not hiding behind those written by someone with as much credibility as you in 1929. Oh I'm so sorry, I didn't know everything I post here had to be rewritten in my own fucking words you bloody dipshit. When the fuck did you become my goddamn middle school English teacher? Fuck off and take your inane condescension and infantile allegories with you. Cool, I've been Marney'd I understand completely what you were trying to say with that quote, but the quote you used wasn't the best. The quote you gave was in direct response to the statement "If SP wants to come on this message board and post without getting his faith torn apart, then he should be able to." and was, as a result, an arguement of the point that SP should be able to have his faith torn apart. My reply to this was that as a result, atheism should be equally argued against, and that the quote you gave was an atheist equivalent of the things you disliked in SP's posts. And whatever way you look at it, the quote you gave was very dissmissive of theologists and at times quite condacending. If you feel like the word persecution was too strong, feel free to replace it with the word criticism, but I would have thought the jist of my point would have come across to you of all people. And I still don't understand why you used that quote instead of saying the same things in your own words in half the time? To sound more intelligent? To make your argument sound more valid? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheGame2705 Report post Posted July 12, 2003 All this thread was about Marney being a God-hater and thinking anyone who doesn't agree with her is stupid. In all honesty, I don't care how much crap you can pull out of your ass trying to disprove the bible because it won't make me or any other Christian feel different. I've noticed it's also the cool thing nowadays to hate God. Go ahead, HE STILL LOVES YOU Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheZsaszHorsemen Report post Posted July 12, 2003 This is about seeing all the little Marney bitches (YPoV, BB) from the Church of Marney, clap their little hands every time she spewed her special brand of pedantic garbage like some creature from the movie "Aliens." Marney, you said you wouldn't flame someone for saying there was no God because it couldn't be disproved. Can it be disproved that there IS a God? I mean you can't cite lack of proof because proof denies faith and without faith, there is no God. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bob_barron Report post Posted July 12, 2003 This is about seeing all the little Marney bitches (YPoV, BB) from the Church of Marney, clap their little hands every time she spewed her special brand of pedantic garbage like some creature from the movie "Aliens." Marney, you said you wouldn't flame someone for saying there was no God because it couldn't be disproved. Can it be disproved that there IS a God? I mean you can't cite lack of proof because proof denies faith and without faith, there is no God. Actually Zsasz- I just hate Spider Poet more then I like Marney. That's why I'm happy seeing Marney make him into a little bitch Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheZsaszHorsemen Report post Posted July 12, 2003 This is about seeing all the little Marney bitches (YPoV, BB) from the Church of Marney, clap their little hands every time she spewed her special brand of pedantic garbage like some creature from the movie "Aliens." Marney, you said you wouldn't flame someone for saying there was no God because it couldn't be disproved. Can it be disproved that there IS a God? I mean you can't cite lack of proof because proof denies faith and without faith, there is no God. Actually Zsasz- I just hate Spider Poet more then I like Marney. That's why I'm happy seeing Marney make him into a little bitch Really? What has SP done to you? Because all you've done in this thread is look like one big cheerleader. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bob_barron Report post Posted July 12, 2003 It was directed at those who had posted the, "Sits back and eats some popcorn" comments, Bob. Not literal. Maybe you should have dug a little deeper and read my post a little better there. Did you miss the, "Carry On," at the end? Sorry for thinking you'd be able to pick that up. You're a cronie, Bob. A sidekick. If you're going to flame me, do it on your own time and not on the coattails of Marney's marvelous accomplishment. Start your own thread, stand on your own legs, and maybe, just maybe, your bandwagon opinion will gain some credibility with me. Good day. I'm not going to dignify this thread any further with a response. What do you call that Spider Poet? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cherry Blossom Viscount 0 Report post Posted July 12, 2003 Why couldn't you do it instead of living vicariously through others? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bob_barron Report post Posted July 12, 2003 This is about seeing all the little Marney bitches (YPoV, BB) from the Church of Marney, clap their little hands every time she spewed her special brand of pedantic garbage like some creature from the movie "Aliens." Marney, you said you wouldn't flame someone for saying there was no God because it couldn't be disproved. Can it be disproved that there IS a God? I mean you can't cite lack of proof because proof denies faith and without faith, there is no God. Actually Zsasz- I just hate Spider Poet more then I like Marney. That's why I'm happy seeing Marney make him into a little bitch Really? What has SP done to you? Because all you've done in this thread is look like one big cheerleader. We had a big war at SmarkTalk since he acted like a baby when people were complaining about HBK going over at Wrestlemania. SP was offended that people GASP be unhappy about something in WWE. He ran over to SmarkTalk and whined there- only to return again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dangerous A Report post Posted July 12, 2003 Message Board Beefs : Just like Hip Hop beefs, except without the rhymes!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaParkaYourCar 0 Report post Posted July 12, 2003 Bob, no offense to you, but SP got upset that one time because people were practically calling him stupid for having a different opinion, not because people were mad at the WWE. SP said he liked HBK and a lot of people were saying he was stupid for not seeing it their way. I'm not saying that you were making comments like that, but I've seen that sort of situation over and over on these boards. The same thing happened to Downhome when he professed his like for Goldberg. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bob_barron Report post Posted July 12, 2003 That's where we mainly disagree LP. I was in that thread- We weren't calling SP stupid- we just didn't agree with his opinion. Damaramu did step over the line with one remark and I even I didn't condone that. But SP still needs to stop being a baby when people don't agree with him. Downhome hasn't been called stupid for liking Goldberg either. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaParkaYourCar 0 Report post Posted July 12, 2003 Downhome hasn't been called stupid for liking Goldberg either. What? You must have missed the thread then. Because I was in a thread where people pretty much ragged him to death for it. It was pretty bad. I think it was a RAW thread awhile back. And you might be referring to a different thread and a different time with SP, but I remember being in a thread where SP got the same treatment over his like of HBK. That might have been another one you weren't in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bob_barron Report post Posted July 12, 2003 People were ragging on him for his opinion but then again Downhome was the one who said: STOP THIS RIGHT NOW! I am the official mark for Goldberg at this forum. Well, on second thought... ...join me, allow the emotion and presence of Goldberg to consume you. Sit and watch people who haven't cared about wrestling in a while return (how long they stay is up to his storyline, der), and just enjoy it. Don't just mark out and turn your back on it right off the back. Give it a chance, enjoy it, hell, be a fucking mark all over again. THIS people is what Pro. Wrestling is all about. That rush, that emotion, even when you don't expect it. Props to Rocky by the way, as he will make Goldberg look like a fucking master, the way he bumps and whatnot. I would also like to know what was it I heard a lot of you guys saying about his not being remembered. I think I heard it, I'm pretty sure, I'm CERTAIN you guys said that over and over. Hmmm... But after saying that- He deserves a lot of flak. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaParkaYourCar 0 Report post Posted July 12, 2003 I don't see how that should get him flak. He asked us to give it a chance. Oh well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bob_barron Report post Posted July 12, 2003 He pretty much told us that we had to change our line of thinking towards wrestling and that if we do it- we will enjoy Goldberg. Funny how a guy who hates Edge with a passion didn't become a mark so we could enjoy him- While we should be marks and shut up and enjoy Goldberg. People weren't calling SP and DH 'stupid'. They were calling their opinions stupid. Downhome would often respond to well written well thought anti-Goldberg posts with: Sigh. Many people were doing the same thing to SP regarding their anti-HBK stance. He just came back with the: Shut up and enjoy it stance- He also announced he was leaving the argument twice- yet he came back. It's not like he was an innocent victim. The only thing that occured that was out of line was Dama's Christian remark. But he's an asshole anyway- easily ignorable Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cherry Blossom Viscount 0 Report post Posted July 12, 2003 Bob Barron - Takes net life a tad too seriously. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest SP-1 Report post Posted July 12, 2003 I call it not being able to resist you, Bob. You're so hot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bob_barron Report post Posted July 12, 2003 Bob Barron - Takes net life a tad too seriously. Look at my post count- I think it's quite obvious that I don't have a red hot social life. Thank you SP- I'll take that as a compliment Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaParkaYourCar 0 Report post Posted July 12, 2003 If I showed them that Barron avatar I made the girls would be all over you man. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest treble charged Report post Posted July 12, 2003 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
LaParkaYourCar 0 Report post Posted July 12, 2003 Or that pic will do also. I guess the one I made was a little scary according to some people. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest SP-1 Report post Posted July 12, 2003 Beautiful! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bob_barron Report post Posted July 12, 2003 Barron Moysey London- LADIES! TAKE YOUR PICK! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
