The Dames 0 Report post Posted July 16, 2003 I have a feeling that I'm going to be crucified for my Kane commentary...but I'm curious as to what you guys thought about it. Dames Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MrRant Report post Posted July 16, 2003 I haven't read it yet. But it sucks. Since you are sure you will be crucified... might as well complain without going through the effort of reading it. What the hell is with the line breaks? That is the most irritating thing in the goddamn world. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest CoreyLazarus416 Report post Posted July 16, 2003 **gets the crucifix and nails ready** Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Smell the ratings!!! Report post Posted July 16, 2003 I read it. It was indeed Fierro-esque~! but we still wub you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vyce Report post Posted July 16, 2003 I'll.......I'll never look at you in the same way, Dames.... *runs crying from the sight of his fallen hero* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted July 16, 2003 Half way through, but one note: Taker INTENTIONALLY torched the place. He admitted it in 1998, after about 30000000000 twists and turns in the "who burned the place down" storyline. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vyce Report post Posted July 16, 2003 On a more serious note, after reading the article, I believe you've put more thought into the Kane story than the WWE writers ever have. I mean, c'mon, who here doesn't believe they write the show on a cocktail napkin an hour before the curtain rises? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Askewniverse Report post Posted July 16, 2003 I thought that it was a good read. It seemed like you put more thought into the whole angle then the WWE writers. The only question that I have is this: how would you explain where Kane learned to wrestle? During the Katie Vick angle, Kane mentioned that he was just starting in the business when Katie died. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted July 16, 2003 . All these years, he's never looked in the mirror...afraid of the image that will come back at him and has always tried to keep his face hidden, even going so far as to throw dirt and gunk on it to conceal it from himself, which is why everyone such as DX and Jim Ross were scared of his “real” face when he was unmasked. But what about Ausin last week? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bravesfan Report post Posted July 16, 2003 Taker INTENTIONALLY torched the place. He admitted it in 1998, after about 30000000000 twists and turns in the "who burned the place down" storyline. Did he admit it as a babyface (January - July) or heel (August - November)? The only gaping plothole I've been confused with about this storyline were how heels reacted to an unmasked Kane from 1997-2002, especially when it's now revealed to be psychological damage. You do begin to explain it well, but it leaves a bit to be desired. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheGame2705 Report post Posted July 16, 2003 Didn't I start a similar topic not too long ago and everyone called me dumb? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheBostonStrangler Report post Posted July 16, 2003 Nice work, Dames. I'd love to see them do pretty much what you're suggesting right here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest HartFan86 Report post Posted July 16, 2003 Not bad of an article. Makes you think. Taker admitted to it shortly after Judgment Day 1998 when he rejoined with Bearer. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted July 16, 2003 Taker INTENTIONALLY torched the place. He admitted it in 1998, after about 30000000000 twists and turns in the "who burned the place down" storyline. Did he admit it as a babyface (January - July) or heel (August - November)? The week that Bearer joined him again. October? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest CoreyLazarus416 Report post Posted July 16, 2003 I've been saying they should explain it as psychological scarring for a year and a half now... Good read, Dames. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ANKLELOCK 0 Report post Posted July 16, 2003 I'm a relatively new WWE fan(started in 2001), so I dont know what minor plot twists you missed. It was an entertaining read none the less. Keep doing the column,though, as I'm sure you'll get some less bizarre thing to write about. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest BrokenWings Report post Posted July 16, 2003 . All these years, he's never looked in the mirror...afraid of the image that will come back at him and has always tried to keep his face hidden, even going so far as to throw dirt and gunk on it to conceal it from himself, which is why everyone such as DX and Jim Ross were scared of his “real” face when he was unmasked. But what about Ausin last week? Because the fact that Kane is, in all seriousness, a not so nice fellow to look at? Heh. Great read again Dames. Enjoyed it as usual. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest RavishingRickRudo Report post Posted July 16, 2003 Stop looking at me... Perv. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted July 16, 2003 . All these years, he's never looked in the mirror...afraid of the image that will come back at him and has always tried to keep his face hidden, even going so far as to throw dirt and gunk on it to conceal it from himself, which is why everyone such as DX and Jim Ross were scared of his “real” face when he was unmasked. But what about Ausin last week? Because the fact that Kane is, in all seriousness, a not so nice fellow to look at? Heh. Niether is Sara Undertaker. People never dove off cliffs to avoid looking at her. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest HartFan86 Report post Posted July 16, 2003 One thing....the logic gap about the hair thing is still there. Other people can take Kane's mask off and the hair doesn't come off, but when he does, it comes off. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest bravesfan Report post Posted July 16, 2003 The week that Bearer joined him again. October? If Percy's character is willing to take the fall for everything, you can say that UT was brainwashed by Bearer to admit that, just so they (UT & Kane) would always be at each other's throats. (Bearer secretly sabotaging UT?) I don't know; just a suggestion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest LJSexay Report post Posted July 16, 2003 Methinks the heels that have seen him unmasked may have seen him with all that gunk and soot on his face, the way we first saw him. Probably seeing him like THAT would have made them cringe the way they did in the past. woo! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest RavishingRickRudo Report post Posted July 16, 2003 Oh, and how come Papa Shango and Multiple Personalies weren't used? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Dames 0 Report post Posted July 16, 2003 I was trying to make it as realistic as possible... I wonder how much e-mailed feedback I'll get for this. Dames Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted July 16, 2003 Methinks the heels that have seen him unmasked may have seen him with all that gunk and soot on his face, the way we first saw him. Probably seeing him like THAT would have made them cringe the way they did in the past. woo! ::Begins feverishly pointing to the "Toughest SOB" not being able to look at a gunkless Kane:: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest RavishingRickRudo Report post Posted July 16, 2003 If Kane mutilated himself and his face in order to hide his true-self, then shouldn't he STILL be doing it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MrRant Report post Posted July 16, 2003 ::Begins feverishly pointing to the "Toughest SOB" not being able to look at a gunkless Kane:: Down boy. DOWN. Good boy. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest RavishingRickRudo Report post Posted July 16, 2003 Isn't it realistic for the WWE creative team to think of something outlandishly stupid?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MarvinisaLunatic Report post Posted July 16, 2003 The first part before the wrestling would make for an interesting movie, if only you could figure out how to replace the wrestling part with something else though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted July 16, 2003 Next week Dames should explain how my mind works! Ratings...er, HITS, BABY~! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
