Jump to content

Major SPOILER for RAW next week


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Mulatto Heat
Posted

Well, SD is in California, thus on Pacific Time. SD always starts at the same time no matter where they are, and I find that usually spoilers come around at 11 PM local time at the very earliest. It's now 10:30 PM PST.

Guest Choken One
Posted

Yeah...It's kinda late even for West Cost Spoilers...

 

They should be in about a Hour or so..

Posted

The best part about this post is that we are all just assuming that shane WILL come back. I just want to point out how I love how the Torch doesn't have any faith in their info by making sure that they add "But Rock said he would be there and wasn't, so anything can happen" so that when he DOESN'T show up, they can say "We didn't promise it".

 

To be honest, I don't think Shane will show up at all. Sure, he would be a good face for kane to fight for a while (cause they need them), but don't forget Shane's continuing disinterest in getting back in the ring. And, everyone knows that if he comes back for "just one Raw" in a major storyline role that he will be asked to be on TV for at least 3 weeks. And, he has stated that he doesn't want to do that at all.

 

If Shane does come back, more power to him, and I hope it makes for compelling television (because we all know, McMahon + TV Air Time + Hogan's Air Guitar = Ratings).

 

And speaking of, Raw's 4.2 - ALL LINDA MCMAHON BABY!!

Guest NoCalMike
Posted

Another McMahon ready to take the spotlight away from the workers. UGH.....Sorry guys, but Shane is NO DIFFERENT, and is worse than Linda being on TV. Linda may be boring, but she isn't taking any heat from the wrestlers. "WWE is McMahons"

Guest Sakura
Posted
The best part about this post is that we are all just assuming that shane WILL come back. I just want to point out how I love how the Torch doesn't have any faith in their info by making sure that they add "But Rock said he would be there and wasn't, so anything can happen" so that when he DOESN'T show up, they can say "We didn't promise it".

It's not that Torch doesn't think the news is credible...it's that WWE changes their plans all the time because they write RAW on a napkin hours before the show.

Posted

Still, stick with your shit. Cause if 1bob comes by and says "YES FOR A FACT SHANE WILL BE ON!" then who looks better, 1bob or Torch (well, if Shane is on)... granted, 1bob takes the risk of being completely wrong.

 

The internet is such a dirty dirty place

Guest Choken One
Posted

It's 2:30...NO FUCKING SMACKDOWN SPOILERS YET?

Guest Lightning Flik
Posted
It's 2:30...NO FUCKING SMACKDOWN SPOILERS YET?

...Choken this is about RAW spoilers for this coming RAW. Not Smackdown this tuesday... At least that's what I got by the topic title.

Guest Choken One
Posted

Yes...But we talked about it a little on the first page when AS asked about it.

Guest Lightning Flik
Posted
Yes...But we talked about it a little on the first page when AS asked about it.

Ah. Ok then, didn't read the first page.

Guest Sakura
Posted
Still, stick with your shit.

They are. The story is that the plan is for Shane to return. They're not saying they're unsure if that's true. They are sure THAT is true. What they said at the end is that knowing the WWE that plan may change. The fact that they're saying the plan may change is GOOD journalism.

Guest Choken One
Posted

Is this the longest we've ever waited for Spoilers? EVER?

Guest 11and0baby
Posted

Actually Shane coming on TV is a natural progression in Kane taking down people in power.

 

First We had Bischoff

Then We Had Austin

Then we Had JR

Then We Had Linda

Then We Get Shane

Then We Get Vince.

 

After Kane has done them all in, The Next Logical step is to bring Taker in and see if his 'Brother' can control him.

 

So Bitch all you want. It looks the writers are actually planning something out using logic.

Guest Austin3164life
Posted

Even though Shane is tolerable out of the McMahon clan, I still don't want to see another McMahon on television when we should see a wrestler built up to Kane.

Guest Anglesault
Posted
Actually Shane coming on TV is a natural progression in Kane taking down people in power.

 

First We had Bischoff

Then We Had Austin

Then we Had JR

Then We Had Linda

Then We Get Shane

Then We Get Vince.

 

After Kane has done them all in, The Next Logical step is to bring Taker in and see if his 'Brother' can control him.

 

So Bitch all you want. It looks the writers are actually planning something out using logic.

Shane's gonna get his ass on yet another PPV and take a paycheck away from someone. So it's not good.

Guest Choken One
Posted

On yet another? You act like he tours with them...

 

He hasn't done a damn PPV in 2 years.

Guest 11and0baby
Posted

Shane is probably only going to be on Raw and get his ass handed to him.

 

Everyone assumes he is going to on the PPV but I don't think they are gonna throw away the Kane v RVD match.

Guest Choken One
Posted

and besides...I'm just still going with the Shane takes over Mommies Position and is the UBER-FACE to combat Kane and will bump for him...

 

RVD will get his match but in an Non-Scantioned Cage Match.

Guest Anglesault
Posted
On yet another? You act like he tours with them...

 

He hasn't done a damn PPV in 2 years.

HE SHOULDN'T BE DOING THEM AT ALL

Guest Korgath
Posted

I'm just wondering who else is going to face Kane at the moment, since Kane is currently booked between IC Title competitors and World Title squashes.

 

It doesn't make sense unless you intend to build up Kane VS RVD around the World Title. Except that would make TOO MUCH sense.

Guest TheZsaszHorsemen
Posted
Actually Shane coming on TV is a natural progression in Kane taking down people in power.

 

First We had Bischoff

Then We Had Austin

Then we Had JR

Then We Had Linda

Then We Get Shane

Then We Get Vince.

 

After Kane has done them all in, The Next Logical step is to bring Taker in and see if his 'Brother' can control him.

 

So Bitch all you want. It looks the writers are actually planning something out using logic.

Shane's gonna get his ass on yet another PPV and take a paycheck away from someone. So it's not good.

Well, I guess you're right seeign as Kane/Shane would be a fun spotfest, and RVD/Kane would be a **** psychological battle.

 

 

Oh wait... no it wouldn't.

 

 

I'm entertained by Shane, boo fucking hoo.

Guest Retro Rob
Posted
Uh Sure GameCop. I'm sure the WWE Roster FLOCK to here.

Well, we are probably being watched by someone.

 

 

:ph34r:

 

 

Unfortuantely, that someone is probably Howard Finkel.

Guest Choken One
Posted
Uh Sure GameCop. I'm sure the WWE Roster FLOCK to here.

Well, we are probably being watched by someone.

 

 

:ph34r:

 

 

Unfortuantely, that someone is probably Howard Finkel.

HI HOWARD!

 

Love the Hair!

Guest The Hamburglar
Posted
Well, I guess you're right seeign as Kane/Shane would be a fun spotfest, and RVD/Kane would be a **** psychological battle.

 

 

Oh wait... no it wouldn't.

 

 

I'm entertained by Shane, boo fucking hoo.

Absolutely spot on. At least in Shane's spotathon matches I know I'll probably be surprised by something. Also, Shane times his face comebacks way better then RVD ever has. And when Shane gets the crap beaten out of him it actually really looks like it, unlike Rubberman Van Dam.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...