SPOILERS for Vince and Taker

[Guest DeputyHawk]

...but just caught them on rajah, from meltzer apparently. interesting

 

The reason behind Undertaker’s recent matches in which he pulverizes his opponents is because Vince McMahon is keeping him strong, trying to get a really big build up with the fans. Vince and ‘Taker are getting ready for a long-term feud, which will include Vince managing both Brock Lesnar and Kane against him. This could also build up to a match between Vince and The Undertaker as well.

[Guest Trivia247]

well gee... Make Undertaker look all big and strong so he can Job to...

 

Vince.

 

trying to debate if this better than him v Giant Gonzalez.

[CanadianChris 0]

...but just caught them on rajah, from meltzer apparently. interesting

 

The reason behind Undertaker’s recent matches in which he pulverizes his opponents is because Vince McMahon is keeping him strong, trying to get a really big build up with the fans. Vince and ‘Taker are getting ready for a long-term feud, which will include Vince managing both Brock Lesnar and Kane against him. This could also build up to a match between Vince and The Undertaker as well.

Oh good. I know everyone has just been mentioning recently that we don't get enough McMahons on TV.

 

[Guest Choken One]

YES!

 

13 YEARS IN THE MAKING!

 

U ever notice Taker says "I've been with you for 13 years vince..." a hell of lot of times?

[DrVenkman PhD 0]

Hooray for WrestleMania XX, Undertaker vs Vince!

[Guest Choken One]

I wouldn't put it past vince to end taker's streak

[Spaceman Spiff 0]

Wait, Kane on SD? What's the point of moving one of the most over guys on Raw (w/ it's already weak roster) over to SD (which has problems getting all of its guys on TV & PPV's)?

 

Not to mention that now that Mark Henry is off Raw, we (read: I) don't want another boring generic big guy on SD.

[caboose 0]

Oh god no.

 

But a Kane/Undertaker match seems logical considering Kane's recent storylines.

[Guest Trivia247]

Oh god no.

 

But a Kane/Undertaker match seems logical considering Kane's recent storylines.

more logical without a McMahon involved using Kane as a underling..... especially since Kane proclaims he will do only what they want to do.

 

So what happen Kane gets thrown into the fiery pit and he goes through some dimensional portal where he is phyiscally ok, and he gets teleported to Smackdown?

 

 

ok thats farfetch even for the WWE

[RavishingRickRudo 0]

I've been waiting for this moment ever since Taker terrorized Vince's family and tried to marry his daughter.

 

Oh what's that?

 

Vince was in on it?

 

It was him all along?

 

No fuckin shit.

[Damaramu 0]

It's news like this that makes the baby jesus cry...

[Guest Choken One]

can we fucking stop the baby jesus bullshit?

 

It's rapidly becoming the modern "Ghey" around here...

[Damaramu 0]

Ok....no more baby jesus BS.

it's news like this that makes the baby HHH cry....

[Guest DeputyHawk]

see now, i'm actually thinking a vince-led stable of lesnar, kane plus some other (talented) guys could work out. as long as vince himself jobs to taker next mania to blow it off.

 

i'm not saying it's a good thing mind, just not as bad as some of the alternatives we could be getting. it could work out okay as long as they keep the world title faaaaar away from the whole scenario.

 

heel stables so rule. i yearn for what could have been with shane, angle, benoit, show, edge & christian back in mid-2000.

[RavishingRickRudo 0]

Vince goes over Taker at Mania 20.

 

Makes sense.

[Ultra Violence 0]

I think Sean O Haire should go over Taker at wrestlemania 20

[Guest godofdeadlydeath]

Wah wah wah... Good for Vince. He's doing what he wants.

[Guest Choken One]

I think Sean O Haire should go over Taker at wrestlemania 20

mmm...I hope Anglesault sees this...

[BoboBrazil 0]

I still say Undertaker will be traded to Raw for HHH. Maybe Undertaker, Albert, and Big Show for Evolution.

[cabbageboy 0]

O'Haire is so buried at this point it's not even funny.

 

This UT/Vince thing is fine with me as long as it doesn't involve the title at any time. Keep it the fuck away from everyone in this feud and it'll be a decent diversion.

[Damaramu 0]

Even if it doesn't involve the title it will still be looked at as the MAIN FEUD on SD!. Remember the Hogan/Vince feud? Well this'll be like that only 10x worse b/c it involves "The big dog in the yard".

[the pinjockey 0]

Wah wah wah... Good for Vince. He's doing what he wants.

Yes. Good for Vince. Good for me too, they are already trying to help me save $50.

[haVoc 0]

So Taker will be feuding with Angle (for the title) AND Lesnar (#1 contendership) AND Kane (who will be moving to SD?) AND Vince McMahon (God) all about the same time?

 

Talk about a push!

[haVoc 0]

Edit: lousy double post

[BoboBrazil 0]

It's the yearly Undertaker main event push.

[Anakin Flair 0]

Ok....no more baby jesus BS.

it's news like this that makes the baby HHH cry....

wouldn't that be the baby Benoit?

 

Just saying...

[LaParkaYourCar 0]

Screw that. This makes Baby La Parka cry!

[Just call me Dan 0]

I like the idea of pushing Taker because since his last title run, he has impressed me in the ring. I would much rather have him up there with the upper talent that being in midcard feuds where guys are really getting over and are fed to him.

 

Feuding with Vince, I don't like.

 

The ONLY reason I'd like him to feud with Kane is so Kane can go over, he's always been the little bitch. I think it will REALLY hurt RAW, but Smackdown could use a ratings bump and they are pretty short on top heels.

 

This pretty much keeps him away from having to be beaten by HHH or Goldberg, and will probably help him in the longrun.

[Invictus 0]

I have a bad feeling Kurt will be giving up his title next week for this travesty.... I pray that I am wrong.

[Just call me Dan 0]

Taker isn't taking the title from anyone. If anyone dethrones Angle it will be a brand-jumping Kane.