Guest hunger4unger Report post Posted August 28, 2003 In the latest edition of the Wrestling Observer newsletter, Meltzer says that Vince McMahon vs The Undertaker in a buried alive match has been pencilled in for Survvor Series. Thoughts~! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KTID 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 Whats your point? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest webmasterofwrestlegame Report post Posted August 28, 2003 I'd imagine that will be rubbed straight out after the latest Taker main event push draws nothing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Boo_Bradley Report post Posted August 28, 2003 The ~EVIL~ will rise from the ground to make one last run,.....before switching gimmicks again to "freshen up" in time for WM 23 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Fook Report post Posted August 28, 2003 This better not be for the title... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Youth N Asia 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 errr...why? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest hunger4unger Report post Posted August 28, 2003 RVDMARK: What do you think about this is my point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cabbageboy 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 I've got no real problem with this if: 1. There is no title on the line here. 2. Vince gets buried. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the pinjockey 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 This blows. If they run with Angle/Eddie at SS, I am going to end up paying for another big McMahon match that will get all the credit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChris 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 Can we get all the midcarders to run in and bury them both? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Duncan Eternia Report post Posted August 28, 2003 As long as Vince doesnt wrestle until then, I guess it's ok. Also I think Taker should get screwed over and come back, at say - Rumble, with the Dead Man gimmick. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Retro Rob Report post Posted August 28, 2003 As long as Vince doesnt wrestle until then, I guess it's ok. Also I think Taker should get screwed over and come back, at say - Rumble, with the Dead Man gimmick. Why? So they have another reason to push him to the top? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Dynamite Kido Report post Posted August 28, 2003 As long as Vince doesnt wrestle until then, I guess it's ok. Also I think Taker should get screwed over and come back, at say - Rumble, with the Dead Man gimmick. and while they are at it, maybe they should bring back Doink, Duke Droese and every other cartoon gimmick they ever had Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mole 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 Great more Vince. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 When was the last time a Buried Alive match happened anyway? Uh, PPV-wise? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest wwF1587 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 Now i use to be a fan of buried alive matches, in fact i still mark for them but WHY does the one buried alive match in years have to involve a DAMN MCMAHON!! Arghh.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slickster 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 When was the last time a Buried Alive match happened anyway? Uh, PPV-wise? IYH: Rock Bottom in December of 1998. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EdwardKnoxII 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 Can we get all the midcarders to run in and bury them both? No cause knowing the WWE HHH will run out with Jericho and RVD his shoulders, throw them into the hole and bury them alive. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 As long as Vince doesnt wrestle until then, I guess it's ok. Also I think Taker should get screwed over and come back, at say - Rumble, with the Dead Man gimmick. and while they are at it, maybe they should bring back Doink, Duke Droese and every other cartoon gimmick they ever had Difference between Taker and every other gimmick out there is that it Worked. I doubt it would work again since He said publically he wouldn't go back to the Deadman gimmick. this shit is just continuation of McMahon's need to be on camera so much that it causes other matches to disappear from the card. And for McMahon to beat Taker. So there would be no wrestler left on the roster that can Intiminate him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jester 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 The "Undertaker going back to the Deadman" thing is rapidly becoming the new "Raw renamed to Nitro." Any match between Taker and Vince is going to be the focus at the expense of anything else. The only reason why "building new stars takes time" is because they keep focusing on this crap. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Ghost of bps21 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 I hope Vince wins. I'd hate to see the companies top star miss TV time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 That'd be sad if UT sells for Vince...just sad... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NoCalMike 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 this is quite the lame idea, but then again, nothing new or shocking. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest rawmvp Report post Posted August 28, 2003 What are the other matches being penciled in for Survivor Series? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Ghost of bps21 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 I'm sure it's something like... Steph vs. Sable and A-Train Shane vs. Kane II Linda vs. Bischoff You know...money matches. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ultra Violence 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 Linda / Bischoff vs Shane / Jackie Gayda Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ultra Violence 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 Linda McMahon / Bischoff vs Shane / Jackie Gayda Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RavishingRickRudo 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 Oooh goody, this will be like the epic McMahon vs. Mr America feud that took up so much fucking time to accomplish dicknothing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndrewTS 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 Oooh goody, this will be like the epic McMahon vs. Mr America feud that took up so much fucking time to accomplish dicknothing. It accomplished something--it led to us finally getting rid of Hogan. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nl5xsk1 0 Report post Posted August 28, 2003 Let me be the first to show the positive spin on this ... if the two old men are fighting each other, they're not fighting anyone else. One horrible match is better than two. And if they were fighting two seperate people, they'd most likely both go over. Prediction - Kane interferes, costing Taker the match. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites