The List of Wrestlers Shane's "better than" thread

[Guest Anglesault]

Since Shane McMahon has repeatedly manhandled and stopped the unstoppable monster Kane, including beating himself at Unforgiven, the message that WWE seems to sending to us is that Shane is better than Kane.

 

However, since Kane is able to beat the crap out of everyone but Shane (who can beat Kane up at will), we are led to believe that Kane is better than these wrestlers. Since Shane is apparently better than Kane, he must be better than these wrestlers as well.

 

So, here it is, the one and only list of wrestlers that are inferior to Shane-o Mac. Feel free to add any I may have forgotten.

 

1. Kane

 

2. RVD

 

3. The Hurricane

[JHawk 0]

Everybody but Triple H.

 

Well, that was easy.

[Ripper 0]

Both members of Kronic

 

The Dudleys

 

A-Train

 

Mic Foley

 

Steve Austin(which in essense makes him better than Rock and HHH)

 

Chris Jerhico

[HollywoodSpikeJenkins 0]

Big Bossman...

 

 

 

 

*wants a 100 reasons why Bossman is better then Shane*

[Guest webmasterofwrestlegame]

It would only be shipped off to No Holds Barred.

[Guest Trivia247]

Steve Blackman

 

Test

 

The Big Show

 

Xpac

[RavishingRickRudo 0]

Linda McMahon

JR

King

Bischoff

[Guest netslob]

my, somebody sure sounds bitter...

[Guest Redhawk]

That was so sad to hear Jim Ross last night: "Kane is a monster! He can't be stopped! Too bad Shane McMahon isn't here! Kane's gonna get what's coming to him, and hopefully it will be when Shane McMahon comes back!"

 

I know that WWE has this thing where wrestlers cannot have any on-screen interaction whatsoever unless they're feuding or teaming, but wouldn't it have done a lot for Goldberg's character if they had him save that little kid from Kane?

 

That, combined with how Goldberg acted like the ring ropes were electric when Mark Henry was dragging HBK away, makes it seem like Goldberg is only out for himself. Which may be true in real life, but everything about his TV character suggests he should have gone after Henry and Kane last night.

 

Anyway, according to WWE's system, Shane is better than every babyface on the roster (since he's the only one who can stop Kane), and since Shane is better than Kane and Triple H is the only heel better than Kane, that means Shane is the 2nd-best wrestler on the show.

[cawthon777 0]

Shane is better than ...

 

the Genius

Bastion Booger

Akeem

Bushwhacker Luke

SD Jones

Gene Okerlund

Jamison, the nerd from Prime Time

 

...Wait, I take that back. They're better than he is.

[AndrewTS 0]

Everybody but Triple H.

 

Well, that was easy.

You forgot Taker. Kane hasn't been able to beat Taker clean ever, I don't think.

[MarvinisaLunatic 0]

Mark Henry

[Guest vex_hecubus]

1) "The Artist Formally Known As Prince Iaukea"

 

2) Doink & Dink

 

3) Alex Wright(or Berlyn just before he flopped out)

 

4) The Mountie

 

5) Jean-Pierre LaFitte

 

6) The Bushwackers

 

Oh wait we are listing the wrestlers who Shane is better than, not who is better then Shane! DOH!

[The Ghost of bps21 0]

Come on Anglesault...use logic here.

 

Shane had Kane beat before he risked his life...erm...stole the spotlight...and it cost him.

 

RVD couldn't come that close to Kane...

 

So Shane > RVD.

 

The only people RVD hasn't won more than lost against are Kane, Taker, Brock and HHH.

 

He tied HBK...so Shane is better than him...and HBK is still up on HHH by one...so HHH falls. HBK also has beaten Taker more than lost...so he falls...and Kane can't beat Taker...so he falls in the end too.

 

Rock is 0-1 vs. RVD...so Shane beats him.

 

Austin is tied with RVD I think (Loss on RAW, win at No Mercy)...so Shane beats him.

 

Angle is like 0-1-1 in TV matches with a tie on the day of the draft for the IC title and a loss while Kurt was champion...so he's gone.

 

That leaves Brock.

 

It's simple logic.

[Guest BionicRedneck]

But Kurt's beaten Shane. Who is better than Kane. Who is better than RVD. Or something.

[Guest Redhawk]

The Rock has beaten RVD before. Remember the WCW championship match when Stephanie fell into the ropes and knocked RVD off, leading to the Rock Bottom?

 

Angle beat RVD for the Hardcore title once, but than lost it right back only after Austin threw RVD onto Kurt. And I could have sworn RVD and Kurt have had at least three or four TV matches, than one on PPV (No Mercy 01).

[Kahran Ramsus 0]

Kurt is 2-0 against Shane, isn't he? KOTR 2001 and the RAW after Unforgiven 2001?

[The Ghost of bps21 0]

That was the OLD Shane McMahon.

 

The Old Shane O'Mac couldn't take down a monster like Kane...he struggled against the Big Show!

 

The NEW Shane McMahon is virtually unstoppable...and an interpromotional WWE title match vs. Brock at Mania is not only needed...but by god...it's warranted.

[Kahran Ramsus 0]

The Old Shane O'Mac couldn't take down a monster like Kane...he struggled against the Big Show!

 

Show can beat Kane, and since Shane beat Show, Old Shane should be able to beat Kane.

[The Ghost of bps21 0]

Hmm...

 

Perhaps...

 

HOWEVER...it seems that without a doubt Shane is the far and away #1 contender to the RAW title at least.

[Kahran Ramsus 0]

Until HHH gets back. I think Shane could take Goldberg though.

[Guest MikeSC]

Until HHH gets back. I think Shane could take Goldberg though.

Hmm, a Shane v GB v HHH ME at SSeries?

 

Isn't that a sign of the apocalypse?

 

Of course, we could go WAY back with this and prove, definitively, that Shane could whup Lou Thesz.

-=Mike --- scary

[The Ghost of bps21 0]

I think I saw on Confidential that Shane beat Thesz 2 falls straight in 1948.

[Guest MikeSC]

I think I saw on Confidential that Shane beat Thesz 2 falls straight in 1948.

Well, that's not EXACTLY truth.

 

Thesz quit during the 2d fall in 1948 after all of the pain that Shane had inflicted upon him.

 

He's a monster.

-=Mike

[bob_barron 0]

I think I saw on Confidential that Shane beat Thesz 2 falls straight in 1948.

Well Randy Orton is better then Lou Thesz so that's not saying much

[The Ghost of bps21 0]

Ahh...see I didn't know that.

 

I do know that the win was never recognized by the evil NWA, thus causing the WWE's creation 15 years later.

 

WWE would get it's revenge however, by taking over the NWA title lineage and putting it into their RAW World title...despite having no actual basis in doing so.

[Guest MikeSC]

Ahh...see I didn't know that.

 

I do know that the win was never recognized by the evil NWA, thus causing the WWE's creation 15 years later.

 

WWE would get it's revenge however, by taking over the NWA title lineage and putting it into their RAW World title...despite having no actual basis in doing so.

Wow --- I didn't know that it caused the WWWF/NWA split.

 

Man, it must have been cool back when pro wrestling was real and stuff.

-=Mike

[The Ghost of bps21 0]

Well...wrestling is STILL real.

 

The only time it's "fake" is when the bigger guy loses...you know...so the fans will think they have a chance every match.

 

In order to not take down the credability of the product...the such occurances are very rare...and usually reserved for Shane McMahon.

[Guest MikeSC]

Well...wrestling is STILL real.

 

The only time it's "fake" is when the bigger guy loses...you know...so the fans will think they have a chance every match.

 

In order to not take down the credability of the product...the such occurances are very rare...and usually reserved for Shane McMahon.

Hmm, since Test once beat Shane --- does that mean that

 

1) Test is HORRIBLY underused and should be allowed to go ahead and annihilate GB for the World Title.

 

Or...

 

2) Shane got MUCH better with experience.

 

Can somebody with as much talent as Shane possibly not be great from the get-go?

-=Mike

[The Ghost of bps21 0]

Everyone knows why Test beat Shane. I mean come on. It's all anyone ever talks about!

 

Remember...the...SCREWJOB!!!

 

Shane screwed Shane.

 

...

 

Then of course things were smoothed over and Shane resumed his domination.