Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
MarvinisaLunatic

Fantasy NBA League?

Recommended Posts

I thought it was set up that whoever had the most points would win the game. Isn't that why you assigned all those point values to stats.

 

As for the 1-0 vs. 4-3 arguement I would prefer just you either win or lose, no winning each stat category. It is easier to track, plus it limits the damage in case some teams decide to quit and give 7-0 wins to the teams who face them late in the season. As opposed to those teams who faced them when they were still playing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I thought it was set up that whoever had the most points would win the game. Isn't that why you assigned all those point values to stats.

 

As for the 1-0 vs. 4-3 arguement I would prefer just you either win or lose, no winning each stat category. It is easier to track, plus it limits the damage in case some teams decide to quit and give 7-0 wins to the teams who face them late in the season. As opposed to those teams who faced them when they were still playing.

Actually, for NHL/NBA you must rack up the most stats in each category. So you need to beat that person for the most categories. At least that's what the original rules stat. Personally, I want to play it so you just have to kick the crap out of my said opponent. Not get lucky and land a 7-0 and basically fuck everyone over as I jump out to a great start. It says that you beat the person if you get the most statistical categories, but in the NHL Smarks League, I know this isn't true. As I beat the Leafs (my opponents) with a 9-7-1 record and ended up with that as my recorded. Not just 1-0-0.

 

:angry: Oh bloody hell... *just finished reading rules regarding Head-To-Head* It's the exact same for weekly. Dammit. That means we get stuck with the 7 "games" winning strat.

 

147 "games" leaves a lot of room for err. I mean, you'd have to have everyone get a lot of 5-2, 5-1-1, 4-3-0, 4-2-1 combos to make it look even close.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the last pick in the 7th round, Team 2004 selects

 

 

 

 

 

G Mike Miller

 

 

With the first pick in the 8th round, Team 2004 selects

 

 

F Al Harrington

 

 

Alfdogg, you're next.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

With the Head 2 Head league rule it will be exciting because on any given sunday........er week the team can win. There will be no major blowouts unless the opponet's team is full of scrubs who only play 2 minutes a game or are injuried. The match ups will be naturally competitive, there will be no reason to give up because there is always hope.

 

I petty the fool who gives up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
With the Head 2 Head league rule it will be exciting because on any given sunday........er week the team can win. There will be no major blowouts unless the opponet's team is full of scrubs who only play 2 minutes a game or are injuried. The match ups will be naturally competitive, there will be no reason to give up because there is always hope.

 

I petty the fool who gives up.

This is true.

 

I'll fiddle with the league as soon as the draft is completed and see if I can't get it working to the way we wanted it. If I can, that'll be great. If not, it's 7 "games" per week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Smell the ratings!!!

but for the love of god take all the foul categories off. I don't want to get stuck with a "loss" because one of my guys fouls out, you know?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
but for the love of god take all the foul categories off. I don't want to get stuck with a "loss" because one of my guys fouls out, you know?

Um... Actually, right now I've only got FGM, FTM, 3PM, PTS, RB, BLK, ST. Until I know otherwise, that's all I'm having.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Mindless_Aggression

I'm in favor of the Head 2 Head league rule as well, it sounds like it'd result in the best competition.

 

On a random note, I am shocked Mike Miller was still available this late in the draft.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On a random note, I am shocked Mike Miller was still available this late in the draft.

What can I say, I do my homework when I am picking. I was even more surprised that Pacer fanboy Alfdogg let Al Harrington slip to me this late as well. I was all set to pick up some other guys and lo and behold, Harrington and Miller were still not picked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On a random note, I am shocked Mike Miller was still available this late in the draft.

What can I say, I do my homework when I am picking. I was even more surprised that Pacer fanboy Alfdogg let Al Harrington slip to me this late as well. I was all set to pick up some other guys and lo and behold, Harrington and Miller were still not picked.

I think the reasoning some people got missed is because a lot of people went with certain categories (as did I), or needed to pick up some roleplayers in the final rounds.

 

Oh and I like head-to-head, but I'd prefer just kicking the shit out my opponent for a single win. Not hoping to God I steal a 5-2 victory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On a random note, I am shocked Mike Miller was still available this late in the draft.

What can I say, I do my homework when I am picking. I was even more surprised that Pacer fanboy Alfdogg let Al Harrington slip to me this late as well. I was all set to pick up some other guys and lo and behold, Harrington and Miller were still not picked.

Well, I was actually going to pick Harrington if Prince was gone. I figure Larry Brown is smart enough to stick with him after the nice playoffs he had.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×