SamoaRowe Posted November 12, 2003 Report Posted November 12, 2003 If they are just starting a feud now, does this mean that tonight's match between Christopher Daniels and Low Ki will be a little three minute ditty ala' Justin Credible vs Jerry Lynn on the One Year Anniversary show? I really want to get the show tonight but I just know that if I don't order it I'm going to hear all about how it was the MOTY or something.
The Ghost of bps21 Posted November 12, 2003 Report Posted November 12, 2003 They aren't just starting a feud. Low Ki spends so much time overseas that we might end up not seeing him for months again. I will warn you however, that tonight's storyline seems like the perfect opportunity to write Elix Skipper back into the script taking Daniels side (which would go along with his statement a few weeks back that he was going to dump his followers and bring in his family).
SamoaRowe Posted November 12, 2003 Author Report Posted November 12, 2003 Ahw... well then... I was just wondering because if the match is going to be good, I want to pay to see it. If it's going to be a throw-away match, the rest of the card is not good enough to warrant paying to see the show.
Corey_Lazarus Posted November 12, 2003 Report Posted November 12, 2003 They have no reason to not make this match good.
The Ghost of bps21 Posted November 12, 2003 Report Posted November 12, 2003 Do you have In Demand? Because they offer a replay right after the show and all day tomorrow then at odd times througout the week. You could wait and see.
SamoaRowe Posted November 12, 2003 Author Report Posted November 12, 2003 They have no reason to not make this match good. I know that those two can blow the roof off the house, I'm just afraid that if it's cut short for whatever reason, that I'm going to hate TNA for tricking me into ordering just to watch Abyss vs Harris and Lex Luger.
SamoaRowe Posted November 13, 2003 Author Report Posted November 13, 2003 I guess I should stop worrying. This is TNA we're talking about, not WWE. No one expects to get fucked over with TNA PPVs.
tpww7 Posted November 13, 2003 Report Posted November 13, 2003 I guess I should stop worrying. This is TNA we're talking about, not WWE. No one expects to get fucked over with TNA PPVs. I do..after ordering about all but 5 shows. But it's wrestling...
Corey_Lazarus Posted November 13, 2003 Report Posted November 13, 2003 No one expects to get fucked over with TNA PPVs. This is either the greatest bit of sarcasm ever, or the saddest statement of current affairs ever.
Guest MikeSC Posted November 13, 2003 Report Posted November 13, 2003 I guess I should stop worrying. This is TNA we're talking about, not WWE. No one expects to get fucked over with TNA PPVs. Umm, remember Hacksaw Duggan and Rick Steiner as Jarrett's mystery opponents? -=Mike
Guest Markingout Posted November 13, 2003 Report Posted November 13, 2003 Or Moondog Spot or Micheal Shane. Or the fact that they have Killings in 3LK. He should be heavily in the title scene or in a main fued which I hope he gets when he fueds with Diamond and Swinger for the tag titles. I can only hope, right?
SamoaRowe Posted November 14, 2003 Author Report Posted November 14, 2003 No one expects to get fucked over with TNA PPVs. This is either the greatest bit of sarcasm ever, or the saddest statement of current affairs ever. It was half-sarcasm. Until last night, I've never felt fucked over by a TNA PPV, but I had known of other shows where people were definitly fucked over (Duggan/Steiner for example).
Guest MikeSC Posted November 14, 2003 Report Posted November 14, 2003 Or Moondog Spot or Micheal Shane. Or the fact that they have Killings in 3LK. He should be heavily in the title scene or in a main fued which I hope he gets when he fueds with Diamond and Swinger for the tag titles. I can only hope, right? Well, I've seen precious little of him since his WWF days, but if Killings has toned down the spot-blowing (he was REALLY bad about that in the WWF), I have no beef. He's easily the most talented member of that trio --- even while blowing spots. -=Mike
SamoaRowe Posted November 15, 2003 Author Report Posted November 15, 2003 Killings looked like he was in top form this week. For some reason, whenever I've ordered the show this year, he's been in a non-wrestling role, so this was the first time I actually got to see him in a long time. He's much better now, especially since I don't remember his ring skills being anything special when he was NWA champ.
Guest Markingout Posted November 15, 2003 Report Posted November 15, 2003 "Killings looked like he was in top form this week. For some reason, whenever I've ordered the show this year, he's been in a non-wrestling role, so this was the first time I actually got to see him in a long time. He's much better now, especially since I don't remember his ring skills being anything special when he was NWA champ." His skills were alright,but TNA missed the face they could of built a star. Killings was getting over so quick. People were talking about him everywhere.
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Posted November 15, 2003 Report Posted November 15, 2003 TNA used proof that they could take anyone and make them a big success without gimmicks. Well, The Truth was a kinda gimmick, but not something stupid. Ron Killings goes from WWF Jakked mainstay K-Kwik to NWA World Champion in one year.
HollywoodSpikeJenkins Posted November 15, 2003 Report Posted November 15, 2003 Without the AJ/Lynn feud, and The Truth, TNA might not be here today.
Guest Markingout Posted November 15, 2003 Report Posted November 15, 2003 "Without the AJ/Lynn feud, and The Truth, TNA might not be here today." Exactly what I am saying.
tpww7 Posted November 15, 2003 Report Posted November 15, 2003 That could be a good thing or a bad thing.
Guest Markingout Posted November 15, 2003 Report Posted November 15, 2003 "That could be a good thing or a bad thing." Meh, it would of been bad. TNA has had some really good matches. Alot of crap. But they have had some good stuff.
SamoaRowe Posted November 15, 2003 Author Report Posted November 15, 2003 I am still very grateful to have NWA-TNA around. They are still an alternative to WWE and the best hope for some competition (even though it seems we've lost a lot of that hope in the past couple of months). There was a good point about Ron Killings: everyone was talking about him. He was a big reason why I initially ordered TNA last year, there was no way I could believe that "K-KwiK" had become a dominant NWA Champion until I saw it with my own eyes.
tpww7 Posted November 15, 2003 Report Posted November 15, 2003 Yeah but they havent had a real good match since around May-June, its been a brutal last few months.
SamoaRowe Posted November 15, 2003 Author Report Posted November 15, 2003 Yeah but they havent had a real good match since around May-June, its been a brutal last few months. Yes, there have been trying times as of late. However, we need to keep up some hope. Why should we even bother to continue to be wrestling fans if the future of every major wrestling company is failure?
Guest Markingout Posted November 15, 2003 Report Posted November 15, 2003 "Yeah but they havent had a real good match since around May-June, its been a brutal last few months." What about Super X? Daniels and Ki was good. Plus Dutch is just settling in. Give him some time too pump out some good matches. Hopefully he dosent kill the X-Division with "X". Jeez...
tpww7 Posted November 15, 2003 Report Posted November 15, 2003 Super X was a bunch of fun little spotfests, but thats about it. Daniels- Ki was about ** 3/4 - *** which I wouldnt call GREAT, it was also not nearly as good as they could of pulled off.
Guest Markingout Posted November 15, 2003 Report Posted November 15, 2003 They had little time too work with. I would give it *** which in my standards is good. I liked Super X. Juvi and Sabin was damn good. Sabin and Karazian was pretty good. Hart and Juvi was a spotfest. You didnt like Juvi and Sabin?
SamoaRowe Posted November 15, 2003 Author Report Posted November 15, 2003 I would agree that the Low ki/Daniels match from this week was indeed ***. The match didn't have much heat either I haven't seen the Super X Tournament (I was feeling poor that week) but I have heard many good things about it. Spot-fests aren't all that bad, they can be pretty entertaining. Um... I don't know... I just want to be able to say good things about wrestling. I'm begging here!
Styles Posted November 16, 2003 Report Posted November 16, 2003 Kind of dissapointing, seems like they were holding back on account of time and match placement. **1/2 by my count. Also, when discussing TNA still being around, if they get big and challenge WWE, wouldn't it be ironic that WWE gets fucked over yet again by a Panda?
SamoaRowe Posted November 16, 2003 Author Report Posted November 16, 2003 Kind of dissapointing, seems like they were holding back on account of time and match placement. **1/2 by my count. Also, when discussing TNA still being around, if they get big and challenge WWE, wouldn't it be ironic that WWE gets fucked over yet again by a Panda? Hmm... Pandas continually screwing over the WWE? Does this mean that Seven and Bane are going to debut in Panda costumes and get their asses kicked by Hurricane and Rosey?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now