Guest Besus Report post Posted December 28, 2003 You don't want Randy Orton to win the Royal Rumble.....Because? I have seen some members complain about Randy Orton possibly being the 2004 Royal Rumble winner.Why dont you want him to win? Is it because you want Beniot to win? He dont have to win the Rumble to get a title shot.Is it because you hate Randy Orton? Answer please. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the pinjockey 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 -Because he sucks -Because if Benoit doesn't need the Rumble to get a title shot, neither does Orton Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted December 28, 2003 I don't think he should fight for the title on the biggest show ever done. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 I don't think he should win the most popular match in the WWF. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 Well let's see.......Orton sucks......and well.........Orton sucks........and umm........Orton sucks........and umm..........Batista is better than he is. Why does Orton get the god push? I mean Batista is young...and he's a hoss! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChick 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 Let's look at this from a realistic standpoint: -Is Randy Orton over enough to get a shot? -Is he good enough to have a good match at the biggest card of the year? -Has he won any huge matches to distinguish himself as a main-eventer? Huh. Looks like all answers would be a resounding "no". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 The crowd would shit all over an Orton win. It should be a high-profile wrestler, but not one you'd expect to win it all. Sort of lke Michaels in '95. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Besus Report post Posted December 28, 2003 How is Batista better then Randy Orton? Both is decent on the mic and Randy Orton is better in the ring.It's not like Batista gets any reaction.Remember earlier this year they hyped him and Week after week you heard nothin but his theme music when he came out and Still do. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
the pinjockey 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 Yeah, you can't ignore the reaction that Orton gets during his entrance. He seems like half the time he gets greeted with WOOOOOOOOs. Granted that is probably because Flair is usually with him, but we can ignore that. Let's look at it this way. Pros for Orton winning the rumble: - young - um.....has a six pack? (Apparently that means something, since that is what 90% of his character is) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
razazteca 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 Mark Henry should win it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted December 28, 2003 The thing about everyone hating him winning is that the Rumble is in Philly. The crowd in Philly shits on almost EVERYTHING. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2GOLD 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 Plus according to storyline (yeah, they have those), Crippler DOES need to win the Rumble to get the title shot against Brock. Unless you want Stephanie to come back? Do you want that??? Plus, Randy Orton getting the shot at the Rumble would make it a god push and then it's a nightmare. No title shot at WM and it's just an overpush. Title shot at Mania means god push which means most being to hate him more. And the last thing we all need is more Orton hate here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted December 28, 2003 How is Batista better then Randy Orton? Both is decent on the mic Except that Batista can do a promo. and Randy Orton is better in the ring Based on? They both had bad matches with HBK and RVD. Remember earlier this year they hyped him and Week after week you heard nothin but his theme music when he came out and Still do. This differs from Orton how? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChris 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 How is Batista better then Randy Orton? Both is decent on the mic and Randy Orton is better in the ring.It's not like Batista gets any reaction.Remember earlier this year they hyped him and Week after week you heard nothin but his theme music when he came out and Still do. Who ever said Batista was better than Randy Orton? Batista would be about the only guy about whom I could say that I'd rather see Orton win the Rumble than him. Orton hasn't done near enough to deserve a shot at what is supposedly the biggest show of the decade. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChris 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 The thing about everyone hating him winning is that the Rumble is in Philly. The crowd in Philly shits on almost EVERYTHING. No, they shit on everything BAD. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest PowerPB13 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 Plus according to storyline (yeah, they have those), Crippler DOES need to win the Rumble to get the title shot against Brock. So then what? Benoit loses, again? You're fooling yourself if you think WWE would ever, EVER give Benoit a legitimate run as champion. -Patrick Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2GOLD 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 Plus according to storyline (yeah, they have those), Crippler DOES need to win the Rumble to get the title shot against Brock. So then what? Benoit loses, again? You're fooling yourself if you think WWE would ever, EVER give Benoit a legitimate run as champion. -Patrick I'd rather see Chris lose at WM than watch Randy Orton and HHH for the belt with Orton winning it. I'll take a Crippler loss over an Orton win any day of the week. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 There is no point in debating. Benoit is winning it, plain and simple. I'm willing to put down my money on it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest PowerPB13 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 (edited) There is no point in debating. Benoit is winning it, plain and simple. I'm willing to put down my money on it. *shrug* If you want to keep on believing that, be my guest. I'd rather live in the real world. -Patrick Edited December 28, 2003 by PowerPB13 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Besus Report post Posted December 28, 2003 So Orton vs HBK/RVD wasn't decent as some say it was? Why was it "bad"? Randy Orton can cut a promo too.Damn that one against Mick Foley in June? was good. If he win the Rumble he will deserve a shot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
HollywoodSpikeJenkins 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 Dreamer should win. Philly would explode. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChris 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 If he win the Rumble he will deserve a shot. If they book him to win the Rumble, he deserves the main event slot at Mania 20? Based on what? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 How is Batista better then Randy Orton? Both is decent on the mic and Randy Orton is better in the ring.It's not like Batista gets any reaction.Remember earlier this year they hyped him and Week after week you heard nothin but his theme music when he came out and Still do. Who ever said Batista was better than Randy Orton? Batista would be about the only guy about whom I could say that I'd rather see Orton win the Rumble than him. Orton hasn't done near enough to deserve a shot at what is supposedly the biggest show of the decade. *raises hand* I did. I can actually sit through a Batista match or promo without trying to figure out something else to do. I can't do that with Orton. Anytime I see Orton's face I walk away. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Ray Report post Posted December 28, 2003 1) Orton doesn't completely suck. 2) Orton vs Michaels was decent. 3) Fuck the Rumble, I say Orton for president~! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted December 28, 2003 I don't have a problem with Orton winning the Rumble at all. But I do have a problem with how you guys bitch and moan about HHH being the champ and when there is a chance for someone new, you guys can't stand it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted December 28, 2003 So Orton vs HBK/RVD wasn't decent as some say it was? Why was it "bad"? . Decent possibly. I consider "decent" to be closer to "bad" on the spectrum Randy Orton can cut a promo too.Damn that one against Mick Foley in June? was good. Don't recall one. I do remember several hideous (including the Hi-Lite Reel) ones on HBK. And a bad one when he was named the fifth member of Team Bisch Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Damaramu 0 Report post Posted December 28, 2003 I don't have a problem with Orton winning the Rumble at all. But I do have a problem with how you guys bitch and moan about HHH being the champ and when there is a chance for someone new, you guys can't stand it. For the very last time for the extremely dense people. We want somebody new. This much is true. BUT WE DON'T WANT THE NEW PERSON TO SUCK WORSE THAN WHAT WE HAVE BEFORE. ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE ARE BETTER NEW GUYS WAITING TO WRESTLE BUT THEY ARE GETTING PASSED UP IN FAVOR OF A PIECE OF SHIT IN THE RING. NOW DO YOU UNDERSTAND? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Report post Posted December 28, 2003 Randy Orton can cut a promo too.Damn that one against Mick Foley in June? was good. Wow. He had one good promo 7 months ago. Congratu-fuckin-lations for proving how Orton sucks. This is nominated for the most retarded post ever. Heres a clue: Wrestling is pre-determined. I can set up a ring, hire 29 indy guys and put myself over in a Rumble match, doesn't mean I'd disserve a title shot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault Report post Posted December 28, 2003 I don't have a problem with Orton winning the Rumble at all. But I do have a problem with how you guys bitch and moan about HHH being the champ and when there is a chance for someone new, you guys can't stand it. Ideally, "someone new" should be an improvement over the guy we bitch about. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Report post Posted December 28, 2003 I don't have a problem with Orton winning the Rumble at all. But I do have a problem with how you guys bitch and moan about HHH being the champ and when there is a chance for someone new, you guys can't stand it. For the very last time for the extremely dense people. We want somebody new. This much is true. BUT WE DON'T WANT THE NEW PERSON TO SUCK WORSE THAN WHAT WE HAVE BEFORE. ESPECIALLY WHEN THERE ARE BETTER NEW GUYS WAITING TO WRESTLE BUT THEY ARE GETTING PASSED UP IN FAVOR OF A PIECE OF SHIT IN THE RING. NOW DO YOU UNDERSTAND? I could care less about Orton winning the Rumble, he would just be a transitional champion for someone else after Mania. HHH won't give it to anyone else anyway so what is the point of talking about it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
