Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Guest Boo_Bradley

Messed up...

Recommended Posts

Guest evenflowDDT
Guest Frank_Nabbit
Abortions for all!

Booo!

 

Well then Abortions for none!

 

Booooooooo!

 

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.... Abortions for some, commerative hats for others?

 

 

/misquoted alien

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Frank_Nabbit

http://www.hatelabs.com/distractions/albano.swf

 

The Farthest thing from dead babies ever...

 

Bunny Babies. In 1726, Mary Toft was a 25-year-old married woman in Godalming, England who had most unusual pregnancies. In August, after the miscarriage of a normal four-month-old fetus, Mary still seemed to show signs of being pregnant. A month later, she "gave birth" to what appeared to be the guts of a pig. Wait, it gets weirder. In October, so goes the story, she gave birth to a rabbit "with cats paws and head." Thereafter, she gave birth to one rabbit after another - 12 in all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest evenflowDDT
Bunny Babies. In 1726, Mary Toft was a 25-year-old married woman in Godalming, England who had most unusual pregnancies. In August, after the miscarriage of a normal four-month-old fetus, Mary still seemed to show signs of being pregnant. A month later, she "gave birth" to what appeared to be the guts of a pig. Wait, it gets weirder. In October, so goes the story, she gave birth to a rabbit "with cats paws and head." Thereafter, she gave birth to one rabbit after another - 12 in all.

Somewhere, a furry/zoophiliac is masturbating furiously. Don't look at me...once she miscarried my hands went right back to the keyboard. Including the new arrival.

 

Man, I wonder what Satanic pact her husband made for her to give birth to those?

 

EDIT: Aww....hoax?

Edited by evenflowDDT

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

so...the whole abortion talk is done? Seemed like this was gonna be Abortion talk #29 then Dames banned Boo and then the thread's focus went all...crokus...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The rule has always been in there, it's the one about grotesque images. 

 

Seriously, misleading posters to a horrible picture of a baby with its head and arm torn off just to force your opinions on abortion onto others is fucking disgusting. 

 

Dames

While I agree with the banning since it was BEYOND the pale.... is there warnings anymore or not if something is grotesque but not as overly bad as this?

I wouldn't have been upset if he hadn't tricked people into viewing said photograph. That display of deception was enough to warrant an auto ban in my opinion. Warning are still in place for milder offenses.

 

Dames

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Abortions for all!

Booo!

 

Well then Abortions for none!

 

Booooooooo!

 

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm.... Abortions for some, commerative hats for others?

 

 

/misquoted alien

Miniture American Flags for others!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Danny Dubya v 2.0

OK, I'm just going to force myself into the delusion of those babies just being grotesque dolls made by zombie lovers or whatever and NOT have any dreams of ever being eaten alive by a deformed baby or waking up and trying to pull the red blobs out of my eyesockets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Remind to cancel my forthcoming post: My Photographic Adventures in Necrophilia.

 

:lol:

Cancel your forthcoming post: Your Photographic Adventures in Necrophilia.

 

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Remind to cancel my forthcoming post: My Photographic Adventures in Necrophilia.

 

:lol:

Cancel your forthcoming post: Your Photographic Adventures in Necrophilia.

 

:lol:

Where's IDRM to disagree with this stuff?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest FrigidSoul

I wonder when we'll see an aborted fetus involved in a WWE angle; we've had necrophylia and the use of feces.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest FrigidSoul
I wonder when we'll see an aborted fetus involved in a WWE angle; we've had necrophylia and the use of feces.

Well, they've had a hand.

But it wasn't an aborted hand

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I never thought I'd ever see the Dames just go off like that. Not that I blame them after being told the description of that picture.

So is this the most dramatic banning ever?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×