Guest Coffey Posted January 25, 2004 Report Posted January 25, 2004 You know, the thing that sucks is even if the undercard is good, most people here will shit all over the entire PPV if the final match leaves them with a bad taste in their mouths. For example, HHH/HBK could be really good, but would anyone remember that if Benoit got thrown out by Christian early on? Probably the next day, but the initial response will be a bunch of "WTF"'s and the like. It's like, shock value has nothing left.
The Ghost of bps21 Posted January 25, 2004 Report Posted January 25, 2004 (edited) Shock value without purpose never had value in the first place. To dump Benoit just because no one expects it should lead to a bunch of WTFs? Besides...there were WTFs? last year when Jericho got dumped by Test...and all anyone talks about is Benoit/Angle from that show. If the undercard delivers...it'll get its due. Edited January 25, 2004 by "Hail" bps21
Guest Coffey Posted January 25, 2004 Report Posted January 25, 2004 Well, I'm saying if WWE did it to lead to a storyline, people would shit all over it because of what just happened. Then, if anyone tried to say that they are building to a storyline/feud, thirty people would call them a fucking apologist. Yet, those same name callers are the ones who preach about storylines/feuds needing more time to develop....
Guest Choken One Posted January 25, 2004 Report Posted January 25, 2004 Shock value without purpose never had value in the first place. To dump Benoit just because no one expects it should lead to a bunch of WTFs? Besides...there were WTFs? last year when Jericho got dumped by Test...and all anyone talks about is Benoit/Angle from that show. If the undercard delivers...it'll get its due. Yeah but not initally...
Tawren Posted January 25, 2004 Report Posted January 25, 2004 Shock value without purpose never had value in the first place. To dump Benoit just because no one expects it should lead to a bunch of WTFs? Besides...there were WTFs? last year when Jericho got dumped by Test...and all anyone talks about is Benoit/Angle from that show. If the undercard delivers...it'll get its due. Yeah but not initally... How do you know that? SummerSlam had a shitty ending, people still praised the 4 way and Angle/Lesnar.
The Ghost of bps21 Posted January 25, 2004 Report Posted January 25, 2004 And again...last year all I read about was Benoit/Angle being so great. This is a new one...preemptive bitching that can be factually disproved ahead of time.
Guest Choken One Posted January 25, 2004 Report Posted January 25, 2004 Shock value without purpose never had value in the first place. To dump Benoit just because no one expects it should lead to a bunch of WTFs? Besides...there were WTFs? last year when Jericho got dumped by Test...and all anyone talks about is Benoit/Angle from that show. If the undercard delivers...it'll get its due. Yeah but not initally... How do you know that? SummerSlam had a shitty ending, people still praised the 4 way and Angle/Lesnar. The bitching about Jericho/Test was more spread out then the Angle/Benoit love...Go back here the night of the rumble and the next 24 hours and You'll see more bitching about the Jericho incident then admiration for the Benoit match...or rather more people talked about the Steiner/HHH Match actually...
Guest Coffey Posted January 25, 2004 Report Posted January 25, 2004 I would like to point out that I'm talking about initial response. At the end of the night, the negativity shows moreso than the positives. Later in the week, when threads start slowing down, the positive threads get jumped on a lot more. I'm not saying people won't talk about the good. I'm saying they talk about the bad first.
The Ghost of bps21 Posted January 25, 2004 Report Posted January 25, 2004 I searched for the rumble threads from last year. The most negative person in those threads was... YOU, Coffey.
Adam Posted January 26, 2004 Report Posted January 26, 2004 All Im saying is, if Benoit doesn't win, I'll be pretty pissed off. If Benoit doesn't win and Cena/Angle/Jericho does, I'll settle for that.
Guest Anglesault Posted January 26, 2004 Report Posted January 26, 2004 Then, if anyone tried to say that they are building to a storyline/feud, thirty people would call them a fucking apologist. Like last year? Where people actually had the balls to say it wasn't a bad thing because it builds up to the much anticipated JERICHO/TEST FEUD?
The Ghost of bps21 Posted January 26, 2004 Report Posted January 26, 2004 I'd say there was a Big Schmo this year. I mean...they made him look good...but you knew he wasn't winning. There was also a little Jericschmo out there too. He didn't have a prayer.
CanadianChick Posted January 26, 2004 Report Posted January 26, 2004 Funny how the final four had three Smackdown guys (Benoit, Angle, Show) and only one Raw (Jericho) and the Raw guy had the least chance of winning.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now