Dandy Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 Okay, I have a bet with my friend that Jackie Gayda was wearing pasties or something over her nipples when she "flashed" on Monday night. The only pics I have found doesn't really settle the bet for either of us. I found them at: http://groups.msn.com/onefitgal/jackiebustinout.msnw They are from the side, and the ring ropes are covering her up. Does anyone know where we can find good pics so I don't lose any money? I told him that the girls are almost always wearing pasties when they do that.
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 I want to see because I'm a pervert, and damn proud of it. <----Honest.
Dandy Posted January 29, 2004 Author Report Posted January 29, 2004 I'm a pervert, too. But I really do have a bet and I don't want to lose money on something that I pretty much figure I'm right about.
2GOLD Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 Yes, she was. You don't need any pics of her frontal really to tell you she was wearing something to cover them because the WWE would get more trouble than its worth from the arena if she did it without the covers. If you look at that side angle shot, you can see the obvious white spots covering them. Honestly, I saw them before and my reaction stands. "Wow, she has breasts! OH MY GOD! SHE HAS TWO OF THEM! Shock!"
2GOLD Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 And if you need added proof, on the front shot they aren't pushing through the top. She had covers. If you see one without covers, they are fakes.
Dandy Posted January 29, 2004 Author Report Posted January 29, 2004 ~I~ know that she didn't really flash her nips, 2GOLD, and I appreciate your input on the pics from the side that I found. But the fact is, if I don't find a shot from the front, I owe my buddy $20. When we bet, we get the specifics down so there can be no whining afterward. May sound stupid, but that's how we bet, and I was positive this was a sure thing.
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 ~I~ know that she didn't really flash her nips, 2GOLD, and I appreciate your input on the pics from the side that I found. But the fact is, if I don't find a shot from the front, I owe my buddy $20. When we bet, we get the specifics down so there can be no whining afterward. May sound stupid, but that's how we bet, and I was positive this was a sure thing. Well, if there's no proof of if she did or didn't you don't have to pay diddily squat because niether of you know. Unless your that dumb to fall for such a one sided bet.
2GOLD Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 ~I~ know that she didn't really flash her nips, 2GOLD, and I appreciate your input on the pics from the side that I found. But the fact is, if I don't find a shot from the front, I owe my buddy $20. When we bet, we get the specifics down so there can be no whining afterward. May sound stupid, but that's how we bet, and I was positive this was a sure thing. You may very well be screwed. If you get any frontals, they will have nipples added in over the white covers and you'll owe 20 dollars. The best I can tell you is, if she isn't peaking in the shirt then they are covered. She wasn't peaking and the white was obvious. If your friend believes Jackie has white caps on her breasts then some him the other real nipple slip picture of her. It's beyond obvious and if your friend won't buy it, you are toast.
Guest Real F'n Show Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 if you look close on the fifth picture you can see a white pastie. I wouldn't mind seeing some better pics of this either, so if anyone has them, post them damn it!
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 From looking at the pics provided, I can safely bet 100% she has something covering her nipples. You can tell if you've seen the pics of her real accident a few months ago. Your friend owes you $20.
Downhome Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 Forget her tits, I still want to know why in the world Stacey Keibler came out there after she did it.
Dandy Posted January 29, 2004 Author Report Posted January 29, 2004 It's not that I am dumb for the bet or anything. You know the "innocent until proven guilty" thing? Well this is "nipples until proven pasties" thing. That's what the bet was. He said there was no way that she was wearing something over the nipples, and if I could find incontrivertible proof, he'd pay me $20; if not, I owed him. With all the flashbulbs that went off on camera as she had her back to the camera, I just knew the pics would be all over the place. Just like when she had the slip a few months back.
Dandy Posted January 29, 2004 Author Report Posted January 29, 2004 Stacy came out to further the lame Playboy angle. It's already been confirmed that Sable and Torrie are the two that will be in Playboy in March.
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 Forget her tits, I still want to know why in the world Stacey Keibler came out there after she did it. Stacy Keiblers raw appearence is a mystery. Maybe Jackie stole her crack pipe before the match, or stole her underwear...or something else really lame.
2GOLD Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 Forget her tits, I still want to know why in the world Stacey Keibler came out there after she did it. To tease that Stacy and Jackie are the two divas going to be in Playboy. Didn't you hear Lawler basically jacking off next to JR? They are teasing the fans with these two, probably setting up a....match...at Wrestlemania between: Torrie Wilson and Sable vs Jackie Gayda and Stacy Kiebler for the right to appear in Playboy.
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 Forget her tits, I still want to know why in the world Stacey Keibler came out there after she did it. To tease that Stacy and Jackie are the two divas going to be in Playboy. Didn't you hear Lawler basically jacking off next to JR? They are teasing the fans with these two, probably setting up a....match...at Wrestlemania between: Torrie Wilson and Sable vs Jackie Gayda and Stacy Kiebler for the right to appear in Playboy. DEAR GOD NO!!!!! (Scratches eyeballs out with a WWE Magazine; see's Orton on cover) DEAR GOD NO!!! (rips cover off and feeds to my dog, who promptly spits it out and barfs)
Downhome Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 Forget her tits, I still want to know why in the world Stacey Keibler came out there after she did it. To tease that Stacy and Jackie are the two divas going to be in Playboy. Didn't you hear Lawler basically jacking off next to JR? Yes, I understand that, but it still doesn't answer the question "why?".
2GOLD Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 Forget her tits, I still want to know why in the world Stacey Keibler came out there after she did it. To tease that Stacy and Jackie are the two divas going to be in Playboy. Didn't you hear Lawler basically jacking off next to JR? Yes, I understand that, but it still doesn't answer the question "why?". To set up a Smackdown vs Raw bra and panties match between Sable/Torrie and Stacy/Jackie for the right to be nude in Playboy at Wrestlemania. This is Vince, did you HONESTLY think he wouldn't do a T&A match for Wrestlemania? What else is Stacy going to do? Playboy is her way back into the spotlight and Jackie is the one female on RAW that has shown she doesn't mind being nude. So naturally, Stacy decides if she and Jackie are the two then Playboy would come running. Jackie has the breasts and Stacy has the ass. Actually, simple.
Downhome Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 That still doesn't answer "why?" though.
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 That still doesn't answer "why?" though. Because it makes no fucking sense. THATS WHY! IT'S WWE! Anything can happen if it doesn't make sense.
2GOLD Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 That still doesn't answer "why?" though. Read the edit, that's the best explanation I can give you.
lomasmoney Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 wont the issue come out before wrestlemania though
Fökai Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 I doubt they'll milk this Playboy angle out until Wrestlemania. This is Vince, did you HONESTLY think he wouldn't do a T&A match for Wrestlemania? Of course he'll do one - but like previous years, it'll be for the Women's title.
HollywoodSpikeJenkins Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 "Wow, she has breasts! OH MY GOD! SHE HAS TWO OF THEM! Shock!" Two of them, eh? She sounds like my kind of girl.
treble Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 I don't know if this is the most reliable source for news, but Torrie was on the Mike Bullard show the other night and said that she was going to be in some tag match at Mania. So, yeah.
Mole Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 I doubt they'll milk this Playboy angle out until Wrestlemania. This is Vince, did you HONESTLY think he wouldn't do a T&A match for Wrestlemania? Of course he'll do one - but like previous years, it'll be for the Women's title. Ugh, I hate T&A matches. If I want to see tits, I'll watch some porn or try to get laid. I watch wrestling, for wrestling.
SamoaRowe Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 I want to see because I'm a pervert, and damn proud of it. <----Honest. I'm a pervert too, but there are thousands of other women who I consider to be more attractive than Jackie Gayda.
Enigma Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 That wouldn't make sense because the February 2004 issue of Playboy already listed Torrie Wilson & Sable as being in the March 2004 issue. I don't think WWE is THAT stupid. Anyways, they caught a lot of flak, even from their own wrestlers, for doing that pointless T&A crap with the Miller Lite girls at last year's WM.
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Posted January 29, 2004 Report Posted January 29, 2004 That wouldn't make sense because the February 2004 issue of Playboy already listed Torrie Wilson & Sable as being in the March 2004 issue. I don't think WWE is THAT stupid. Anyways, they caught a lot of flak, even from their own wrestlers, for doing that pointless T&A crap with the Miller Lite girls at last year's WM. Most Worthless. Wrestlemania Segment. Ever!!
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now