Jump to content

My final post


Recommended Posts

Guest cosbywasmurdered
Posted

Mario shouldn't have been banned. I hate to say this of a person I'm friends with but Zack let this get personal.

 

Mario had admitted in the past to pretty much just trolling around, and then recently admitted he was a PBP (CheroneWasMudered, as if there was any doubt as to who it really was). Plus, his obsession with "hazing" TSM members was getting just a wee bit out of hand.

 

Cherone was a gimmick account. Which is allowed by the rules. the only reason IT was banned because Mario had so many gimmick accounts and Dames wanted people to only have one.

 

Hazing new people is grounds for banning? ban me. Ban everyone. TONS of people "Haze" new posters. it's practically a tradition. Besides Mario did it in the appropriate folder.

 

Mario shouldn't have been banned. There's no arguement that he could be amazingly annoying. But that's not against the rules.

 

Mario was different. You never knew what he was going to do or say next. Alot of people couldn't handle that, and that's understandable. But he shouldn't have been banned for being unique. I've talked to a bunch of people that not only don't think he should have been banned but don't even understand WHY he was banned. Even when Johnson, CJ, and others were banned and people disagreed with it at least people understood that there was a reason.

 

This really has the feeling of a popularity contest.

Guest KidKrash
Posted
Mario shouldn't have been banned. I hate to say this of a person I'm friends with but Zack let this get personal.

 

Mario had admitted in the past to pretty much just trolling around, and then recently admitted he was a PBP (CheroneWasMudered, as if there was any doubt as to who it really was). Plus, his obsession with "hazing" TSM members was getting just a wee bit out of hand.

 

Cherone was a gimmick account. Which is allowed by the rules. the only reason IT was banned because Mario had so many gimmick accounts and Dames wanted people to only have one.

 

Hazing new people is grounds for banning? ban me. Ban everyone. TONS of people "Haze" new posters. it's practically a tradition. Besides Mario did it in the appropriate folder.

 

Mario shouldn't have been banned. There's no arguement that he could be amazingly annoying. But that's not against the rules.

 

Mario was different. You never knew what he was going to do or say next. Alot of people couldn't handle that, and that's understandable. But he shouldn't have been banned for being unique. I've talked to a bunch of people that not only don't think he should have been banned but don't even understand WHY he was banned. Even when Johnson, CJ, and others were banned and people disagreed with it at least people understood that there was a reason.

 

This really has the feeling of a popularity contest.

:P

Posted
Mario shouldn't have been banned. I hate to say this of a person I'm friends with but Zack let this get personal.

If I let it get personal, Mario would've been gone a loooong time ago.

 

Plus, just like I told him, if I had a vendetta against him, wouldn't I be starting shit over at WDI too, a place where many "Friends Of Zack" are in power?

Guest cosbywasmurdered
Posted
Mario shouldn't have been banned. I hate to say this of a person I'm friends with but Zack let this get personal.

If I let it get personal, Mario would've been gone a loooong time ago.

 

Plus, just like I told him, if I had a vendetta against him, wouldn't I be starting shit over at WDI too, a place where many "Friends Of Zack" are in power?

No you wouldn't because none of them would ban Mario, because while they may be your freinds they don't ban someone just because you don't like him.

 

Hell Dutch was one of the people who didn't think Mario should have been banned.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...