Kerry helped the North Vietnamese

[AndrewTS 0]

damn, now thats some serious mudslinging there. good lord. this will be a BRUTAL campaign

Has Kerry done ANYTHING during his campaign but bitch about the current administration? Maybe I'm not listening in much (because at the candidate stage, I as a Republican don't care), but that's all I've been hearing.

 

The Democrats seem to have succumbed to a terrible bout of wishful thinking, like Michael Moore bringing a condom in his wallet to a Sports Illustrated swimsuit-photo shoot.

 

 

 

Sorry, but that was friggin' gold.

-=Mike

...Yeah, trashing Michael Moore = comic gold

 

Come on, you know Moore wouldn't be there unless the catering was the shiznizzy.

[Guest MikeSC]

The smear campaign starts...and by Fox News! I didn't see that one coming.

God knows Kerry hasn't smeared a soul yet, huh?

 

Bush hasn't been attacked AT ALL.

-=Mike

[Dr. Tyler; Captain America 0]

Yeah, because it's a bad thing to say things about the people you're facing. I haven't heard any of the candidates talking about Bush's cocaine use or alcoholism, have you?

[Rob E Dangerously 0]

and how will John Kerry differ from Bush?

 

Kerry voted for the Iraq war and offered a weak excuse that makes him seem gulliable.

 

Kerry is a war hero who is anti-war but voted for the war but he protested the war he was a hero in.

[Guest MikeSC]

Yeah, because it's a bad thing to say things about the people you're facing. I haven't heard any of the candidates talking about Bush's cocaine use or alcoholism, have you?

Hearing the left bitch that Kerry is being attacked is comical as Bush hasn't even COMMENTED on Kerry to date.

-=Mike

[Dr. Tyler; Captain America 0]

No, he leaves that up to his campaign chief and the RNC.

[Guest MikeSC]

No, he leaves that up to his campaign chief and the RNC.

Oh lord, is this more Rove paranoia?

 

When have the Republicans even mentioned Kerry to date?

-=Mike

...I could mention what tools like Al Gore have said...

[Guest Cerebus]

and how will John Kerry differ from Bush?

 

Kerry voted for the Iraq war and offered a weak excuse that makes him seem gulliable.

 

Kerry is a war hero who is anti-war but voted for the war but he protested the war he was a hero in.

Don't forget that he is anti-war who voted for the war of Iraq but WOULDN'T have voted for it had he known the information wasn't...well not what it was I guess...I shouldn't even try to fucking figure it out.

[Dr. Tyler; Captain America 0]

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/30/...rez.bush.kerry/

 

And that took me all of 3 seconds to find.

[Guest MikeSC]

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/30/...rez.bush.kerry/

 

And that took me all of 3 seconds to find.

Oh well.

 

The intern thing is going to be A HOOT.

-=Mike

[Dr. Tyler; Captain America 0]

Way to change the topic.

[Justice 0]

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/30/...rez.bush.kerry/

 

And that took me all of 3 seconds to find.

So they attack him on a legitmate topic like his foreign policy voting record and all of a sudden this is a smear campaign? Please. The guy has made some very stupid decisions in foreign policy, and this is in a whole different league than the "OMG BUSH DIDN'T SERVE" bullshit that is trying to get passed off as a real issue.

[C Dubya 04 0]

I think that both sides need to admit that there will be negative things said during the campaign. It's amazing that anyone would deny that. I'm a democrat and I think it's horseshit to bring up if Bush served or not. But, I don't for a second believe that the Republicans won't be digging up just as much petty shit about whomever runs.

[Dr. Tyler; Captain America 0]

So they attack him on a legitmate topic like his foreign policy voting record and all of a sudden this is a smear campaign? Please. The guy has made some very stupid decisions in foreign policy, and this is in a whole different league than the "OMG BUSH DIDN'T SERVE" bullshit that is trying to get passed off as a real issue.

 

None of the candidates are responsible for the AWOL issue. That's been brought up in liberal circles since 2000.

 

Mike was talking about the policy attacks on Bush by democratic candidates. I was pointing out that this is simply bullshit. Surely, you understand this, don't you?

Edited February 12, 2004 by Tyler McClelland

[Guest MikeSC]

So they attack him on a legitmate topic like his foreign policy voting record and all of a sudden this is a smear campaign? Please. The guy has made some very stupid decisions in foreign policy, and this is in a whole different league than the "OMG BUSH DIDN'T SERVE" bullshit that is trying to get passed off as a real issue.

 

None of the candidates are responsible for the AWOL issue. That's been brought up in liberal circles since 2000.

 

Mike was talking about the policy attacks on Bush by democratic candidates. I was pointing out that this is simply bullshit. Surely, you understand this, don't you?

As pointed out, the link you linked to was a legitimate policy disagreement with Kerry's politics.

 

This isn't "Bush lied about WMD." "Bush sold the country out" "Haliburton! Haliburton! Haliburton!"

-=Mike

[snuffbox 0]

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/30/...rez.bush.kerry/

 

And that took me all of 3 seconds to find.

So they attack him on a legitmate topic like his foreign policy voting record and all of a sudden this is a smear campaign? Please. The guy has made some very stupid decisions in foreign policy, and this is in a whole different league than the "OMG BUSH DIDN'T SERVE" bullshit that is trying to get passed off as a real issue.

He was pointing out that the Republicans HAVE started mentioning Kerry and his policies. Christ, is this really that hard?

[snuffbox 0]

So they attack him on a legitmate topic like his foreign policy voting record and all of a sudden this is a smear campaign? Please. The guy has made some very stupid decisions in foreign policy, and this is in a whole different league than the "OMG BUSH DIDN'T SERVE" bullshit that is trying to get passed off as a real issue.

 

None of the candidates are responsible for the AWOL issue. That's been brought up in liberal circles since 2000.

 

Mike was talking about the policy attacks on Bush by democratic candidates. I was pointing out that this is simply bullshit. Surely, you understand this, don't you?

As pointed out, the link you linked to was a legitimate policy disagreement with Kerry's politics.

 

This isn't "Bush lied about WMD." "Bush sold the country out" "Haliburton! Haliburton! Haliburton!"

-=Mike

"Interns! Interns! Interns!"

[Guest MikeSC]

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/30/...rez.bush.kerry/

 

And that took me all of 3 seconds to find.

So they attack him on a legitmate topic like his foreign policy voting record and all of a sudden this is a smear campaign? Please. The guy has made some very stupid decisions in foreign policy, and this is in a whole different league than the "OMG BUSH DIDN'T SERVE" bullshit that is trying to get passed off as a real issue.

He was pointing out that the Republicans HAVE started mentioning Kerry and his policies. Christ, is this really that hard?

So they mentioned them. I hadn't heard of it, but they did.

 

What he GOP said is a FAR CRY from the absurd bilge the Dems have launched at Bush.

-=Mike

[Dr. Tyler; Captain America 0]

Yes, because for Mike to admit that he's wrong would cause his head to spontaneously combust and spew pig shit across three states.

[Guest MikeSC]

So they attack him on a legitmate topic like his foreign policy voting record and all of a sudden this is a smear campaign? Please. The guy has made some very stupid decisions in foreign policy, and this is in a whole different league than the "OMG BUSH DIDN'T SERVE" bullshit that is trying to get passed off as a real issue.

 

None of the candidates are responsible for the AWOL issue. That's been brought up in liberal circles since 2000.

 

Mike was talking about the policy attacks on Bush by democratic candidates. I was pointing out that this is simply bullshit. Surely, you understand this, don't you?

As pointed out, the link you linked to was a legitimate policy disagreement with Kerry's politics.

 

This isn't "Bush lied about WMD." "Bush sold the country out" "Haliburton! Haliburton! Haliburton!"

-=Mike

"Interns! Interns! Interns!"

The GOP hasn't touched the story.

 

They don't NEED to. Some might, but the Bush campaign, most likely, won't comment on it, outside of saying something to the effect of "no comment" when asked about it.

 

This simply will force Kerry to stop the character attacks on Bush as he knows he might have some problems there.

-=Mike

[Guest MikeSC]

Yes, because for Mike to admit that he's wrong would cause his head to spontaneously combust and spew pig shit across three states.

Yawn. Tyler trying to be edgy and cutting is actually fairly droll and uninspiring.

 

Don't you have more basic poli. sci. to completely not grasp?

-=Mike

[snuffbox 0]

So they attack him on a legitmate topic like his foreign policy voting record and all of a sudden this is a smear campaign? Please. The guy has made some very stupid decisions in foreign policy, and this is in a whole different league than the "OMG BUSH DIDN'T SERVE" bullshit that is trying to get passed off as a real issue.

 

None of the candidates are responsible for the AWOL issue. That's been brought up in liberal circles since 2000.

 

Mike was talking about the policy attacks on Bush by democratic candidates. I was pointing out that this is simply bullshit. Surely, you understand this, don't you?

As pointed out, the link you linked to was a legitimate policy disagreement with Kerry's politics.

 

This isn't "Bush lied about WMD." "Bush sold the country out" "Haliburton! Haliburton! Haliburton!"

-=Mike

"Interns! Interns! Interns!"

The GOP hasn't touched the story.

 

They don't NEED to. Some might, but the Bush campaign, most likely, won't comment on it, outside of saying something to the effect of "no comment" when asked about it.

 

This simply will force Kerry to stop the character attacks on Bush as he knows he might have some problems there.

-=Mike

i was only talking about you Mikey. You have a problem with people mentioning such things as 'No WMDs in Iraq' and the Haliburton issue....but noone here has said the word 'intern' more than you.

[Guest MikeSC]

i was only talking about you Mikey. You have a problem with people mentioning such things as 'No WMDs in Iraq' and the Haliburton issue....but noone here has said the word 'intern' more than you.

Well, I can only play by the rules already set in stone by others here.

 

As I said about the judicial nominee filibuster --- you might want to be REAL careful about what precedents you set down as, eventually, you'll be hit by them as well.

 

Oh, INTERN! INTERN! INTERN!

-=Mike

[Guest Cerebus]

*blows whistle*

 

Mike you said:

 

When have the Republicans even mentioned Kerry to date?

 

Tyler fires back:

 

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/30/...rez.bush.kerry/

 

And that took me all of 3 seconds to find.

 

Mike counters:

 

Oh well.

 

The intern thing is going to be A HOOT.

 

Tyler counter-counters:

 

Way to change the topic.

 

Mike blasts back:

 

As pointed out, the link you linked to was a legitimate policy disagreement with Kerry's politics.

 

This isn't "Bush lied about WMD." "Bush sold the country out" "Haliburton! Haliburton! Haliburton!"

 

Sorry Mike, but your words were pretty clear, you did not say that "The Republicans have not mentioned Kerry except for policy disagreements" you said that the Republicans hadn't mentioned Kerry, which Tyler proved they did. Tyler, however, should have taken the small victory and not turned this into a shouting match.

 

Resume play!

[snuffbox 0]

i was only talking about you Mikey. You have a problem with people mentioning such things as 'No WMDs in Iraq' and the Haliburton issue....but noone here has said the word 'intern' more than you.

Well, I can only play by the rules already set in stone by others here.

 

As I said about the judicial nominee filibuster --- you might want to be REAL careful about what precedents you set down as, eventually, you'll be hit by them as well.

 

Oh, INTERN! INTERN! INTERN!

-=Mike

hmmm...Im afraid you lost me with that one

[Guest MikeSC]

*blows whistle*

 

Mike you said:

 

When have the Republicans even mentioned Kerry to date?

 

Tyler fires back:

 

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/30/...rez.bush.kerry/

 

And that took me all of 3 seconds to find.

 

Mike counters:

 

Oh well.

 

The intern thing is going to be A HOOT.

 

Tyler counter-counters:

 

Way to change the topic.

 

Mike blasts back:

 

As pointed out, the link you linked to was a legitimate policy disagreement with Kerry's politics.

 

This isn't "Bush lied about WMD." "Bush sold the country out" "Haliburton! Haliburton! Haliburton!"

 

Sorry Mike, but your words were pretty clear, you did not say that "The Republicans have not mentioned Kerry except for policy disagreements" you said that the Republicans hadn't mentioned Kerry, which Tyler proved they did. Tyler, however, should have taken the small victory and not turned this into a shouting match.

 

Resume play!

I also said this:

 

So they mentioned them. I hadn't heard of it, but they did

-=Mike

[Guest Cerebus]

*blows whistle*

 

Mike you said:

 

When have the Republicans even mentioned Kerry to date?

 

Tyler fires back:

 

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/30/...rez.bush.kerry/

 

And that took me all of 3 seconds to find.

 

Mike counters:

 

Oh well.

 

The intern thing is going to be A HOOT.

 

Tyler counter-counters:

 

Way to change the topic.

 

Mike blasts back:

 

As pointed out, the link you linked to was a legitimate policy disagreement with Kerry's politics.

 

This isn't "Bush lied about WMD." "Bush sold the country out" "Haliburton! Haliburton! Haliburton!"

 

Sorry Mike, but your words were pretty clear, you did not say that "The Republicans have not mentioned Kerry except for policy disagreements" you said that the Republicans hadn't mentioned Kerry, which Tyler proved they did. Tyler, however, should have taken the small victory and not turned this into a shouting match.

 

Resume play!

I also said this:

 

So they mentioned them. I hadn't heard of it, but they did

-=Mike

D'oh. Well I am at work...maybe I should concentrate on one thing at a time eh?

[Dr. Tyler; Captain America 0]

Did you hear that John Kerry had sex with an intern?

[snuffbox 0]

Did you hear that John Kerry had sex with an intern?

bah gawd!

[Justice 0]

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/30/...rez.bush.kerry/

 

And that took me all of 3 seconds to find.

So they attack him on a legitmate topic like his foreign policy voting record and all of a sudden this is a smear campaign? Please. The guy has made some very stupid decisions in foreign policy, and this is in a whole different league than the "OMG BUSH DIDN'T SERVE" bullshit that is trying to get passed off as a real issue.

He was pointing out that the Republicans HAVE started mentioning Kerry and his policies. Christ, is this really that hard?

Gah, my bad. Jesus, I'm like rarely on the board anymore with my college shit. Plus I wrote out that message pretty quickly without really looking at what they were talking about. I thought Tyler was finding fault with it, so my mistake. I appologize.