deancoles 0 Report post Posted February 12, 2004 From reading Scott keith's rant about the Shawn Michaels vs Mankind match it seems as though the result was changed from Mankind winning to a dq win for Shawn.I've always wondered how they would have made Shawn lose while keeping him strong.I watched the match and noticed that Vader never actually hits Michaels, Here's the finish i think they had planned bearing in mind that Vince only changed the finish about a minute before the end of the match: Shawn hits the SCM on Mankind Vader runs in causing Shawn to stop the count Shawn gets rid of Vader and Sid runs out Sid and Vader start fighting Outside and Officials try and stop it Earl Hebner is watching the officials trying to stop the fight Paul Bearer Hits Shawn with the urn Mankind uses the Mandible Claw on Michaels and the Ref stops the match Undertaker then pops out of the Casket when HBK is being placed in it So all they did different was getting the Timekeeper to ring the bell a minute early. Do you guys have any opinions on what the finish was? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JHawk 0 Report post Posted February 12, 2004 The impression I got from Foley's first book was that Vader was supposed to break the three count for the DQ but was late getting there, which is what led to Shawn attacking Vader as he came in. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Report post Posted February 12, 2004 Probably everything you said was the finish LOL. Shawn Michaels losing clean to Mick Foley wouldn't sound right, so they'd pull a KOTR 96, have Bearer hit the guy with the urn, and Mankind apply the claw for the KO win. But I always thought Pins/Submissions won, not Knock Outs, or Referees Decision to end the match. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
deancoles 0 Report post Posted February 12, 2004 Probably everything you said was the finish LOL. Shawn Michaels losing clean to Mick Foley wouldn't sound right, so they'd pull a KOTR 96, have Bearer hit the guy with the urn, and Mankind apply the claw for the KO win. But I always thought Pins/Submissions won, not Knock Outs, or Referees Decision to end the match. When Bob Backlund 1st lost the title he didn't submit or get pinned. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Report post Posted February 12, 2004 Probably everything you said was the finish LOL. Shawn Michaels losing clean to Mick Foley wouldn't sound right, so they'd pull a KOTR 96, have Bearer hit the guy with the urn, and Mankind apply the claw for the KO win. But I always thought Pins/Submissions won, not Knock Outs, or Referees Decision to end the match. When Bob Backlund 1st lost the title he didn't submit or get pinned. I do remember a time he lost due to excessive blood loss, but retained the title. I know, I'll read my own sig. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeDirt 0 Report post Posted February 12, 2004 Hold on - they were originally going to put the title on Foley, or he was going to win by DQ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Report post Posted February 12, 2004 Hold on - they were originally going to put the title on Foley, or he was going to win by DQ? Mankind was suppose to win I believe, but HBK talked Vince into making Sid the man to beat him for the title instead. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
deancoles 0 Report post Posted February 12, 2004 Mankind would only have been champ for a month at the most. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Report post Posted February 12, 2004 Mankind would only have been champ for a month at the most. I wouldn't have a clue. WWF remember was promoting VADER as champ for IYH: IT's Time, when he was going to win at SSlam, but HBK 86'ed that. Maybe Undertaker would've won the title from Mankind if they wen't with the plan for Mankind as champion. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
deancoles 0 Report post Posted February 12, 2004 Mankind would only have been champ for a month at the most. I wouldn't have a clue. WWF remember was promoting VADER as champ for IYH: IT's Time, when he was going to win at SSlam, but HBK 86'ed that. Maybe Undertaker would've won the title from Mankind if they wen't with the plan for Mankind as champion. Maybe Gorilla Monsoon would have made the title vacant due to the way the match was won and Vader could have won a tournament. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeDirt 0 Report post Posted February 12, 2004 After the match at Summerslam and the "two DQ's" thing they did, I always thought they were gonna do a 2/3 falls match with the two of them sometime...but obviously HBK didn't want that. Did HBK have heat with Vader? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Man Of 1,004 Modes Report post Posted February 12, 2004 After the match at Summerslam and the "two DQ's" thing they did, I always thought they were gonna do a 2/3 falls match with the two of them sometime...but obviously HBK didn't want that. Did HBK have heat with Vader? HBK didn't want to lose his spot, and apparently "Vader was a stiff bastard". Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeDirt 0 Report post Posted February 12, 2004 This is what Scaia wrote about the Mind Games main event: "Michaels shifts his weight, and BOTH MEN FLY OFF THE TOP ROPE THROUGH THE SPANISH ANNOUNCERS' TABLE! Amazing bump(s). I am not sure why, but after both men went through the table, Vince actually left the announce position to check on Shawn and the ref. [FWIW, this was either just a little red herring for the 'cores, with Vince trying to sell that his champ was in big trouble and he wanted to make sure he was alright or it was something else that I only caught on to when reviewing the tape late last night. This is far fetched, but could it be right? Earlier in the show, Vince announced the "Buried Alive" match for the next In Your House, and made an out of place comment about how, in a match between Undertaker and Mankind the WWF Title would NOT be on the line. Was this just a misphrased "If Mankind should win tonight, his title will not be on the line," or was it an honest faux pas by McMahon? If we assume the latter, then by going over to talk with Michaels and the ref, could McMahon have been setting up an alternate finish where Michaels would *not* lose the title, as previous planned? Like I said, far fetched, but given what little evidence we've got, it is at least plausible.]" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lil' Bitch 0 Report post Posted February 12, 2004 When Bob Backlund 1st lost the title he didn't submit or get pinned. Apparantly, his manager submitted for Bob when he threw in the towel. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
deancoles 0 Report post Posted February 12, 2004 During Mankind's entrance Vince says "Mankind the next World Wrestling federation Champion arriving if in fact he is the next champion in a casket" so that's twice he mistakes Mankind as the champ. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Betty Houle 0 Report post Posted February 12, 2004 From reading Scott keith's rant I stopped listening after this. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted February 12, 2004 Probably everything you said was the finish LOL. Shawn Michaels losing clean to Mick Foley wouldn't sound right, so they'd pull a KOTR 96, have Bearer hit the guy with the urn, and Mankind apply the claw for the KO win. But I always thought Pins/Submissions won, not Knock Outs, or Referees Decision to end the match. When Bob Backlund 1st lost the title he didn't submit or get pinned. He actually was pinned. By Antonio Inoki. In 1979. Yes, I know what you really meant. As it is, I doubt they had plans for Mankind to win the World Title. He wasn't nearly over enough to be in that position. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Papacita 0 Report post Posted February 12, 2004 As it is, I doubt they had plans for Mankind to win the World Title. He wasn't nearly over enough to be in that position. I dunno if I'd say that. Mankind had crazy heat after the two wins over Taker. In fact, a lot of people (marks anyway) actually thought that Mankind would beat Shawn that night. I could easily see Mankind having a reign similar to Taker's from 91. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest FrigidSoul Report post Posted February 12, 2004 Did HBK have heat with Vader? Both he and Vince did, Sass seems to know the whole thing so I'd PM him about it if he doesn't come across this thread. From my understanding however was that Shawn didn't like Vader because he was stiff with him and also was pushing for Sid while Vince didn't like Vader because Vader was slow at the time due to a knee injury, which he later got surgery for. The fact he went and got surgery for it pissed Vince off even more and lead to Vader becoming Kane's bitch. Thus Vader never had a chance in the WWF. I would however still ask Sass for more details. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted February 13, 2004 Did HBK have heat with Vader? Both he and Vince did, Sass seems to know the whole thing so I'd PM him about it if he doesn't come across this thread. From my understanding however was that Shawn didn't like Vader because he was stiff with him and also was pushing for Sid while Vince didn't like Vader because Vader was slow at the time due to a knee injury, which he later got surgery for. The fact he went and got surgery for it pissed Vince off even more and lead to Vader becoming Kane's bitch. Thus Vader never had a chance in the WWF. I would however still ask Sass for more details. I thought Vader was scheduled to get the title at IYH: It's Time. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeDirt 0 Report post Posted February 13, 2004 Did HBK have heat with Vader? Both he and Vince did, Sass seems to know the whole thing so I'd PM him about it if he doesn't come across this thread. From my understanding however was that Shawn didn't like Vader because he was stiff with him and also was pushing for Sid while Vince didn't like Vader because Vader was slow at the time due to a knee injury, which he later got surgery for. The fact he went and got surgery for it pissed Vince off even more and lead to Vader becoming Kane's bitch. Thus Vader never had a chance in the WWF. I would however still ask Sass for more details. I think he was originally scheduled to have it by then...first at Summerslam, then at Survivor Series, but Sid got put in the Survivor Series match instead. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites