Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Stephen Joseph

BOMBSHELL TIME~!

Recommended Posts

Of course, if the press was CONSISTENT, this story would last for several more weeks.

-=Mike

:rolleyes:

 

Even she said it's false (in Clinton's case, only he ever denied it), which puts the burden of proof not on the accused but on those presenting it as fact (i.e. Drudge.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
We have a right to a full investigation into the character of a man who wants to be our president...

I agree. Let's start with our current one and this Halliburton thing. And then we can move on to see if we can find any more people besides one who remembers meeting him in the Guard, and will swear to it in court. I know that if I met the son of a well-known Congressman in the service, I'd remember it.

 

And then, when he's finally left the White House, we can all gripe about what an ineffective President he was when his power was being heavily circumvented by all these independent investigations being commissioned to look into his past.

 

 

 

Oh, wait a minute, that last part sounds familiar.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
So, Drudge was a blatant lie. And I wouldn't put it passed the Bush admin to start the smear..same with the "photographs" of Kerry and Fonda. Bush is shitting it...he knows he's messed up. Still, he's made his money.

Please, just... shut up. Christ, the British people on this board should slap the shit out of you for being such a dumbass.

 

Please come back when you actually, you know, LEARN something about American Politics that isn't distributed from www.socialistfreedomfighter.com.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Cerebus
BTW, you really are a blithering idiot. You should demand a refund from that college that is so horribly trying to educate you.

Source please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest hunger4unger
So, Drudge was a blatant lie. And I wouldn't put it passed the Bush admin to start the smear..same with the "photographs" of Kerry and Fonda. Bush is shitting it...he knows he's messed up. Still, he's made his money.

Please, just... shut up. Christ, the British people on this board should slap the shit out of you for being such a dumbass.

 

Please come back when you actually, you know, LEARN something about American Politics that isn't distributed from www.socialistfreedomfighter.com.

That's all very well but I don't see you putting forward a constructive counter arguement; you're just flaming now.

 

I don't see how a knowledge of American Politics has to do with my quoted post/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest BDC

Your automatic accusation that the President wasted his time putting that together? Yeah, that's a liberal conspiracy there. How about we project another one: "Drudge got duped" or maybe even "Drudge: Just plain wrong on this one."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
That's all very well but I don't see you putting forward a constructive counter arguement; you're just flaming now.

A counter to what, exactly? All of the logical reasoning in the world wouldn't make the slightest bit of difference to you. Your hatred of Bush makes you spew stupid shit like that (which is in NO way a productive, well-thought out argument), and there is nothing I, Powerplay, MikeSC, or anyone else would be able to say to dissuade you from your ignorant position.

 

Troll.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The alleged woman's father certainly did a 180. First he hates Kerry, know he likes Kerry. All this in a 4 day span.

I need to make a hat. Do you have some tinfoil?

 

This is a non-event that will make bigger headlines on the National Enquirer than on the Wall Street Journal. It was cast into the court of public opinion the day after it broke where it was cast off as rumormongering.

 

And yes, Kerry has denied it:

Senator Kerry himself said initially: "There is nothing to report" and then when that was challenged as a Clinton style non-denial, he stated clearly enough: "I just deny it categorically. It's untrue."

 

I'm not a Kerry fan, but this "story" is old and it has no legs left.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest hunger4unger

Your support of Bush makes you a shit spewer in my eyes. If Bush EVER does anything for the good i'll give the guy credit.

 

Yourself, PowerPlay and Mike are the ignorant ones. Why the blind support of Bush? How is he a good president?

 

There is nothing that I can say to dissuade you from YOUR ignorant position.

 

Troll.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your support of Bush makes you a shit spewer in my eyes. If Bush EVER does anything for the good i'll give the guy credit.

 

Yourself, PowerPlay and Mike are the ignorant ones. Why the blind support of Bush? How is he a good president?

 

There is nothing that I can say to dissuade you from YOUR ignorant position.

 

Troll.

I don't have a lot of time to respond to your drivel, but I'll say this:

 

It's obviously not a secret that I'm a Bush supporter.

 

I wouldn't call it "blind support," though. Right off the top of my head, I can think of two things Bush supports/has endorsed that I do NOT agree with. His immigration amnesty plan makes my blood boil, and I do not think that there should be a constiutional amendment banning gay marriage. Is that "blind support?"

 

I do feel that Bush has done a reasonably good job as President. Does he have his faults? Yes. Do I think that we'd be better off with John Kerry or John Edwards or Howard Dean, et al. instead? No. Unless something drastically changes between now and November, I can't see myself voting for anyone else but Bush.

 

I don't fawn over the guy, though, and will criticize him when I feel it's necessary. You, however, hate everything about him. Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't you think about killing him when he visited your country last time? Yeah, you're real objective. I really don't know why I'm even bothering responding to your "posts."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If blind, irrational hatred of a political figure is akin to trolling, we were all banned yesterday.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×