Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
CheesalaIsGood

A well written column: "Cold Turkey"

Recommended Posts

Guest Cerebus

I"ve always been a fan of Vonnegut's fiction (I still can't get enough of God Bless You Dr. Kevorkian), but he should stay out of non-fiction. Every other claim in that article was just plain wrong. Sorry to dissapoint.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm glad he's not. Optimism is very rarely honesty.

So in other words, only mentally healthy well-adjusted people are depressed?

 

That's a VERY jaded view of this world.

Good. Always have low expectations, that way you will never be disappointed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm glad he's not. Optimism is very rarely honesty.

So in other words, only mentally healthy well-adjusted people are depressed?

 

That's a VERY jaded view of this world.

Good. Always have low expectations, that way you will never be disappointed.

And you'll never get to the stars either.

 

No one made their fortune in this world by setting low expectations

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm glad he's not. Optimism is very rarely honesty.

So in other words, only mentally healthy well-adjusted people are depressed?

 

That's a VERY jaded view of this world.

Good. Always have low expectations, that way you will never be disappointed.

And you'll never get to the stars either.

 

No one made their fortune in this world by setting low expectations

Money's not important to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC
Jesus Christ, that thing made little sense.

 

He's all over the fucking map there.

That's Vonnegut fer ya.

-=Mike

...Not a fan of Vonnegut

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe I'm not "enlightened" or "elite" enough, but don't get what he was saying? Did he even have a thesis, or was he just writing whatever popped into his head? :huh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You try to go into a Vonnegut writing without any sense of what writing would traditionally look like. If you expect some kind of structure or text that you can map out somehow, keep on moving, as you won't find it with him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You try to go into a Vonnegut writing without any sense of what writing would traditionally look like. If you expect some kind of structure or text that you can map out somehow, keep on moving, as you won't find it with him.

Well then, I'll shall simply proclaim him a genius.

 

And, having honored him with that humble accolade, I shall proceed to never again read a word that he has written, and amuse myself with those writers who are no doubt intellectually inferior to this esteemed gentleman, though they have at least managed to learn some fucking structure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If your assessment is that structure is equal to quality, go right ahead. It speaks more ill of you than his readers to say that you can't read something that doesn't have a visible blueprint to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Vonnegut is one of those guys who you either love or you don't. Personally I think he's great and one of my all-time favorite writers (Cat's Cradle is probably one of my three favorite fictions books ever), but I can completely see why people might not like his work at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If your assessment is that structure is equal to quality, go right ahead. It speaks more ill of you than his readers to say that you can't read something that doesn't have a visible blueprint to it.

It's really more along the lines of enjoying reading literature by individuals who don't seem to be suffering from advanced schizophrenia and / or attention deficit disorder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I too thought the fuel/drug example was a good one. I don't understand the schizo comments in regards to this column. *I* didn't have any trouble following what he said. Is it a real downer? Perhaps. I have always found that recognising a problem is the first step towards finding a solution. There willl always be people who don't wanna hear it and label those folks as simply being negative. Sad. :bonk:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest DubWiser

Disagreeing with the man’s opinions is one thing, but claiming that the column “made little sense”, or that he seems to be “suffering from advanced schizophrenia and / or attention deficit disorder“ is absurd.

 

“Every other claim in that article was just plain wrong. Sorry to dissapoint.”

 

Who exactly are you “dissapoint”ing? The OP closed his post with "Let the bashing begin"...Seems that he expected the opinions presented in the column to be dismissed and refuted with exactly the same kind of lucid, in-depth analysis that you provided.

 

"Happy to bash" would have been more appropriate.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If your assessment is that structure is equal to quality, go right ahead. It speaks more ill of you than his readers to say that you can't read something that doesn't have a visible blueprint to it.

It's really more along the lines of enjoying reading literature by individuals who don't seem to be suffering from advanced schizophrenia and / or attention deficit disorder.

Man, you must not read a lot of good works if you don't want to read anything by people who are completely and totally sane in your eyes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×