Jump to content

History of the WWE Title Box Set


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 64
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Has anybody considered that if this box set is legit, the replica belt might be one of those cheesy $12 plastic and foam replicas rather than one of the expensive $300 replicas?

Except it distinctly says "full size replica Championship belt", but it's fake so it doesn't matter.

Posted
Iggy, using, "they included X, but not Y, so it must be fake" reasoning is so bogus.

Actually, I wasn't doing that at all, if you actually read the post. I was saying that if they were just picking and choosing matches, they would have absolutely left Over the Edge out to avoid the controversy. The PPV where someone dies can't be considered a "highlight" match unless they want to be accused of profiting off of Owen's death.

 

The Angle/Austin comment was completely superfluous to my point. I was just saying that after I'd shown it was fake, I felt like pointing out that the guy was a dumbass for leaving Austin/Angle at SS out of his list.

Posted
What really disproves this rumor is the inclusion of the Over the Edge match. The only way they'd ever possibly consider using that match is if they were including every single title change in WWE history. Given that there are title changes that aren't on there, the Over the Edge match is absolutely wrong for any WWE set.

 

Also, whoever the fuckshit was that put that listing together didn't include Austin/Angle from SS 2001. What the hell is that about?

I must say that I liked Austin/Angle a lot more than Austin/Rock from WM that year, and it also made SS the best PPV that year over X-7, for me at least.

Please sign in to comment

You will be able to leave a comment after signing in



Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...