Jobber of the Week 0 Report post Posted September 5, 2004 He's only owned Gore and Richards. Owned Gore? He was far more charismatic than Gore, but I woudln't say his actual content was any better. FUZZY MATH! FUZZY MATH FUZZY MATH! What was the question? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted September 5, 2004 He's only owned Gore and Richards. Owned Gore? He was far more charismatic than Gore, but I woudln't say his actual content was any better. FUZZY MATH! FUZZY MATH FUZZY MATH! What was the question? The debates killed Gore's candidacy. BTW, Newsweek ALSO has Bush up by 11. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Smell the ratings!!! Report post Posted September 5, 2004 didn't Gore get more votes? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted September 5, 2004 Didn't Bush have a double digit lead on Gore in October 2000, around the time of the debates? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted September 6, 2004 He did? I don't remember (didn't pay that much attention, either), although I do seem to recall some media talking heads thinking Bush would win the popular vote and Gore the electoral... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted September 6, 2004 didn't Gore get more votes? Not in Florida where it mattered. Didn't Bush have a double digit lead on Gore in October 2000, around the time of the debates? While I can't speak definitively, I'm fairly sure neither man had a double digit lead. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jesse_ewiak 0 Report post Posted September 6, 2004 Um, Mike, the Newsweek polls internals make that famous LA Times poll look balanced. For example, all polls over the last year for party ID have basically been 32D/29-30R/38-39I. The newsweek poll had 38R/31D/30I. In other words, take the Indies out, and the GOP has a 55/45 lead in turnout, which I think you would even say isn't going to happen in this election. Also, it had military families as 42% of the respondents, which yeah, is a bit off. Personally, Bush is probably up 6-8. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted September 6, 2004 The debates killed Gore's candidacy. I don't know if they "killed" it, but, imo, they made him look like an ass. Remember the first debate he kept sighing whenever Bush talked, and in the third debate he walked over to W. like a bully and Bush just looked up at him and nodded. Funny stuff. Plus, Al kept breaking the rules of the debates... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted September 6, 2004 The debates killed Gore's candidacy. I don't know if they "killed" it, but, imo, they made him look like an ass. Remember the first debate he kept sighing whenever Bush talked, and in the third debate he walked over to W. like a bully and Bush just looked up at him and nodded. Funny stuff. Plus, Al kept breaking the rules of the debates... kkk --- quick questions time: How many seconds into debate one will it take Kerry to mention Vietnam? How many times will he mention it during the debates? Will it be under triple digits? -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted September 6, 2004 I'll say 25 seconds into his opening speech, and if there are three debates then I'll say triple digits... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted September 6, 2004 This is gonna be great............. Mod: 'Mr. Bush. Describe the current economic state' GW: 'Rebounding, the t..........' JK: 'THAT'S A LIE CAUSE I SERVED IN VIETNAM, EXPLAIN 1972-73!' GW: 'You mean when you were cheerleading with Jane? Fine let's talk.' See them 18-30s don't need WWE to vote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
