Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Real shitty answer by Bush here. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheLastBoyscout Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Bush is going to speak for two minutes STRAIGHT? What is a MATHIST? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndrewTS 0 Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Which is worse? Interesting rhetorical strategy by Kerry there. Very good rhetoric from Kerry. Agreed. Unfortunately, Kerry is completely not answering the current question. -=Mike I will agree with you here. Neither man is actually answering the questions. It's a presidential debate...what did you expect? "How will they dodge these issues?" -- Comedy Central announcer Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 1, 2004 WHY was that absurd, Bush? Give examples, SPECIFIC examples. Oh and POLAND is really helping in the War on Terror. Hey, Russia poses NO threat to Poland... Nevermind, different debate. This is going VERY badly for Kerry. -=Mike I wouldn't go quite that far. I don't think it's any sort of trouncing at all. Just referring to the discussion on the coalition. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr. Tyler; Captain America 0 Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Actually, it seems pretty even so far. And Bush framing Iraq as "Us vs. Saddam Loyalists" is STUPID STUPID STUPID. Everyone in the world knows it's al Qaida killing our troops in Iraq. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
teke184 0 Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Ba'athist = member of Saddam's Ba'ath party. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeDirt 0 Report post Posted October 1, 2004 One of my poly sci profs says the key to this debate isn't in the actual debate, it's how the media spins it afterwards to the public and what types of things from the debate they concentrate on. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Actually, it seems pretty even so far. And Bush framing Iraq as "Us vs. Saddam Loyalists" is STUPID STUPID STUPID. Everyone in the world knows it's al Qaida killing our troops in Iraq. He was trying to say that Baathists were the early opponents. But, you're right --- he said it VERY poorly. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted October 1, 2004 But I thought AQ wasn't in Iraq! Sorry I was listening solely to Kerry there.................. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndrewTS 0 Report post Posted October 1, 2004 One of my poly sci profs says the key to this debate isn't in the actual debate, it's how the media spins it afterwards to the public and what types of things from the debate they concentrate on. Sad, but true. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Umm, Kerry just totally contradicted himself. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheLastBoyscout Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Ba'athist = member of Saddam's Ba'ath party. I am aware of that. He said "Mathist" though. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest GreatOne Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Funny Kerry now badmouths Bush for saying the exact same thing HE said in August. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeDirt 0 Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Umm, Kerry just totally contradicted himself. -=Mike I didn't catch it, what did he say? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
teke184 0 Report post Posted October 1, 2004 North Korea? THAT deserved a rebuttal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheLastBoyscout Report post Posted October 1, 2004 North Korea. That's actually a very legit point. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest BDC Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Kerry, you just pulled that Bush would have still gone in, but you've said in the past that YOU would have gone in too. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Umm, Kerry just totally contradicted himself. -=Mike I didn't catch it, what did he say? Griped that Bush said he'd do the same thing, knowing what we know now and that he (Kerry) wouldn't. Kerry, in August, specifically said he'd do the exact same thing, knowing what we know now. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest BDC Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Kerry, stop with the UN. You're blatantly wrong there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheLastBoyscout Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Kerry, you just pulled that Bush would have still gone in, but you've said in the past that YOU would have gone in too. Yes, but he's also said he didn't agree with Bush's plan (or lack thereof) AFTER the War. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr. Tyler; Captain America 0 Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Bush seriously needs to stop looking so damned angry. I don't know if he realizes the cameras are still on him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest TheLastBoyscout Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Bush seriously needs to stop looking so damned angry. Bush wants a duel to the death. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steviekick 0 Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Why isn't Kerry looking at the camera? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Justice 0 Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Kerry, you just pulled that Bush would have still gone in, but you've said in the past that YOU would have gone in too. Yes, but he's also said he didn't agree with Bush's plan (or lack thereof) AFTER the War. ...? Their plans are exactly the same, numb nuts! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest BDC Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Kerry, you just pulled that Bush would have still gone in, but you've said in the past that YOU would have gone in too. Yes, but he's also said he didn't agree with Bush's plan (or lack thereof) AFTER the War. That isn't the point. He was attacking the decision to go in and was hypocritical in the process. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeDirt 0 Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Bush seriously needs to stop looking so damned angry. Yeah, he needs to do his "squint and smirk" thing some more. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
teke184 0 Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Kerry's got a lot of foreign service background... let's talk about his trip to Managua, Nicaragua, PLEASE! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steviekick 0 Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Bush seriously needs to stop looking so damned angry. Bush wants a duel to the death. IN ANGER~! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Kerry, you just pulled that Bush would have still gone in, but you've said in the past that YOU would have gone in too. Yes, but he's also said he didn't agree with Bush's plan (or lack thereof) AFTER the War. Unfortunately, his answer completely contradicted his own statements. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JoeDirt 0 Report post Posted October 1, 2004 Bush seriously needs to stop looking so damned angry. Bush wants a duel to the death. IN ANGER~! Clear the monitors off the table, Lehrer! Someone's going through that table! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
