Guest MikeSC Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Hmm, thus far: The Republicans have had their offices ransacked and robbed in Seattle. They've had shots fired into their offices in TN They've had their HQ trespassed in Milwaukee. They've had their offices in Orlando ransacked. So, at what point will the press feel that this might be a story worth covering? -=Mike
NoCalMike Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Lemme guess Mike, John Kerry gave the hoodlums the orders to do this?
Guest GreatOne Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Funny that the only one saying ANYTHING about Kerry possibly doing this, is you.
NoCalMike Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Funny that the only one saying ANYTHING about Kerry possibly doing this, is you. MikeSC is now back roaming this thread.........give him 30 seconds.
Guest MikeSC Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Lemme guess Mike, John Kerry gave the hoodlums the orders to do this? The DNC has fostered an atmosphere where burning swastikas into lawns, vandalizing signs and cars, storming into Bush/Cheney HQ, shooting at Bush/Cheney HQ, stealing computers from Bush/Cheney HQ, etc are considered OK and legitimate weapons in political warfare. One would have had to have ignored the exceedingly shrill rhetoric from the Dems to ignore that. Did Nixon TELL the Watergate burglars to do what they did? Nope --- but he sure as hell fostered an environment where that was viewed as being OK. -=Mike
Guest GreatOne Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Funny that the only one saying ANYTHING about Kerry possibly doing this, is you. MikeSC is now back roaming this thread.........give him 30 seconds. And you were right, although I'm sure it wasn't by design But HEY, that ultra-intimidating Chris Kanyon-lite mug should save you!
NoCalMike Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Lemme guess Mike, John Kerry gave the hoodlums the orders to do this? The DNC has fostered an atmosphere where burning swastikas into lawns, vandalizing signs and cars, storming into Bush/Cheney HQ, shooting at Bush/Cheney HQ, stealing computers from Bush/Cheney HQ, etc are considered OK and legitimate weapons in political warfare. One would have had to have ignored the exceedingly shrill rhetoric from the Dems to ignore that. Did Nixon TELL the Watergate burglars to do what they did? Nope --- but he sure as hell fostered an environment where that was viewed as being OK. -=Mike Yep, right on schedule.
Guest MikeSC Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Lemme guess Mike, John Kerry gave the hoodlums the orders to do this? The DNC has fostered an atmosphere where burning swastikas into lawns, vandalizing signs and cars, storming into Bush/Cheney HQ, shooting at Bush/Cheney HQ, stealing computers from Bush/Cheney HQ, etc are considered OK and legitimate weapons in political warfare. One would have had to have ignored the exceedingly shrill rhetoric from the Dems to ignore that. Did Nixon TELL the Watergate burglars to do what they did? Nope --- but he sure as hell fostered an environment where that was viewed as being OK. -=Mike Yep, right on schedule. And the usual bilge from NoCal is unleashed. Well, it's better than the USUAL brainless blather from you. -=Mike
Guest GreatOne Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 So being able to predict when people post > content now? OMG Mike and I just made two posts at the same time! Guess that puts that baby to bed, except for those that think there's some giant supercomputer thing going on......................
Guest MikeSC Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 So being able to predict when people post > content now? For him --- yes. -=Mike
Rob E Dangerously Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Mike.. you forgot to blame the DNC for people tearing up the signs of little girls, and illiteracy. Everybody would love Bush if it weren't for the DNC.
NoCalMike Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Lemme guess Mike, John Kerry gave the hoodlums the orders to do this? The DNC has fostered an atmosphere where burning swastikas into lawns, vandalizing signs and cars, storming into Bush/Cheney HQ, shooting at Bush/Cheney HQ, stealing computers from Bush/Cheney HQ, etc are considered OK and legitimate weapons in political warfare. One would have had to have ignored the exceedingly shrill rhetoric from the Dems to ignore that. Did Nixon TELL the Watergate burglars to do what they did? Nope --- but he sure as hell fostered an environment where that was viewed as being OK. -=Mike Yep, right on schedule. And the usual bilge from NoCal is unleashed. Well, it's better than the USUAL brainless blather from you. -=Mike I am not the one that just claimed, "the dnc has made an enviornment where it is OK to do this type of stuff" Considering you didn't point out, what exactly he did to support your claim, but I forgot that in MikeSC's world, when he makes thing up it is fact. This of course coming after folks at the RNC handed out purple bandaids to mock wounds sustained in battle.
Guest GreatOne Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 And I forgot the 'Anything's OK as long as it gets Bush out of office' tactics are being publicly condemned by Kerry right? NoCal I hope you weren't the idiot I got into a huge-ass argument with on AOL (of course that's my problem right there) back in April '03 that said 'YES WE NEED TO DISRUPT THE CIVIL PEACE TO MAKE OUR POINTS KNOWN!!!!!!!'
NoCalMike Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 And I forgot the 'Anything's OK as long as it gets Bush out of office' tactics are being publicly condemned by Kerry right? NoCal I hope you weren't the idiot I got into a huge-ass argument with on AOL (of course that's my problem right there) back in April '03 that said 'YES WE NEED TO DISRUPT THE CIVIL PEACE TO MAKE OUR POINTS KNOWN!!!!!!!' No, I don't have AOL, unless you mean AIM, but even with that, I don't go to chat rooms unless I know the people in there. And disturbing civil peace, well would a protest march be considered that? I mean disturbing civil peace, and what the idiots did breaking into and shooting at buildings is two seperate things.
Guest MikeSC Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 I am not the one that just claimed, "the dnc has made an enviornment where it is OK to do this type of stuff" Considering you didn't point out, what exactly he did to support your claim, but I forgot that in MikeSC's world, when he makes thing up it is fact. This of course coming after folks at the RNC handed out purple bandaids to mock wounds sustained in battle. They HAVE. Whether you wish to admit it or not is immaterial. And if you wish to attempt to compare the band-aids and this, it simply makes you look like a bigger dolt that you do presently. -=Mike
Guest GreatOne Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Actually I was talking about actually, disturbing the peace. You know, pulling the cops away from their real jobs to be their babysitter. But what the hell, anything that gets Bush out of office right? I did get flamed for suggesting that Osama Bin Laden would be more electable than George Bush but I was merely testing the anti-Bush crowd to see how far they'd go with it
NoCalMike Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 I am not the one that just claimed, "the dnc has made an enviornment where it is OK to do this type of stuff" Considering you didn't point out, what exactly he did to support your claim, but I forgot that in MikeSC's world, when he makes thing up it is fact. This of course coming after folks at the RNC handed out purple bandaids to mock wounds sustained in battle. They HAVE. Whether you wish to admit it or not is immaterial. And if you wish to attempt to compare the band-aids and this, it simply makes you look like a bigger dolt that you do presently. -=Mike "they HAVE" Thanks for the insight. I am only 2 steps from being Hannitized now Mike, keep working.
Guest GreatOne Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Hannitization would be an improvement. Then again, what WOULDN'T?
Guest MikeSC Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 I am not the one that just claimed, "the dnc has made an enviornment where it is OK to do this type of stuff" Considering you didn't point out, what exactly he did to support your claim, but I forgot that in MikeSC's world, when he makes thing up it is fact. This of course coming after folks at the RNC handed out purple bandaids to mock wounds sustained in battle. They HAVE. Whether you wish to admit it or not is immaterial. And if you wish to attempt to compare the band-aids and this, it simply makes you look like a bigger dolt that you do presently. -=Mike "they HAVE" Thanks for the insight. I am only 2 steps from being Hannitized now Mike, keep working. If you wish to ignore the rhetoric from the Dems, feel free to do so. -=Mike
NoCalMike Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Hannitization would be an improvement. Then again, what WOULDN'T? adding "SC" to the end of my name?
NoCalMike Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 I am not the one that just claimed, "the dnc has made an enviornment where it is OK to do this type of stuff" Considering you didn't point out, what exactly he did to support your claim, but I forgot that in MikeSC's world, when he makes thing up it is fact. This of course coming after folks at the RNC handed out purple bandaids to mock wounds sustained in battle. They HAVE. Whether you wish to admit it or not is immaterial. And if you wish to attempt to compare the band-aids and this, it simply makes you look like a bigger dolt that you do presently. -=Mike "they HAVE" Thanks for the insight. I am only 2 steps from being Hannitized now Mike, keep working. If you wish to ignore the rhetoric from the Dems, feel free to do so. -=Mike It's good that witch each response, you add some more facts and figures, instead of just an opinion.
Guest GreatOne Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 I'm sure he's mad that you won't be adopting his name anytime soon.................
Guest MikeSC Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Hannitization would be an improvement. Then again, what WOULDN'T? adding "SC" to the end of my name? Well, that would only serve to denigrate me. It's good that witch each response, you add some more facts and figures, instead of just an opinion. I've read this twice now. What the hell are you asking? -=Mike
NoCalMike Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 What the hell are you asking? -=Mike I dunno for some quotes, or articles pertaining to the democrats creating an enviornment where it is ok to shoot at a political headquarters building and/or breaking into them. And please, No Coulter.
Your Paragon of Virtue Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 As much as you guys like to take pointless jabs at him, do you expect him to believe it when there's not one post in here that holds evidence outside of your mouths, err, posts? Until you provide a source...a CREDIBLE source that actually uses some reasoning as to show that the DNC or Kerry or Edwards are behind all of this then he, and I, will believe it. God forbid we don't believe everything you say. I should also point out that GreatOne is ridiculously good at creating straw men.
kkktookmybabyaway Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Eh, all this stuff reminds me of when Democrats whine like little bitches when they say certain Republican spokespeople flame the fires of hate. I say bring it on Democrat bitches. Harass a Bush supporter, and I'm around to witness it, and it will be on like Donkey Kong...
Styles Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 Mike and Great One are so cute together. I can see them at like father/son conservative picnics and such.
Rob E Dangerously Posted October 6, 2004 Report Posted October 6, 2004 it's like "My Two Dads".. they both have a daughter.. or something
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now