Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
EVIL~! alkeiper

Is X a HOFer?

Recommended Posts

baseball-reference.com has the 2004 stats up already and updated the HOF test numbers. Going by the Hall of Fame Monitor Albert Pujols is already a likely Hall of Famer.

 

http://www.baseball-reference.com/p/pujolal01.shtml

 

Black Ink: Batting - 15 (146) (Average HOFer ~ 27)

Gray Ink: Batting - 86 (260) (Average HOFer ~ 144)

HOF Standards: Batting - 36.0 (180) (Average HOFer ~ 50)

HOF Monitor: Batting - 109.5 (127) (Likely HOFer > 100)

More of the greatness of Pujols:

 

Similar Batters through Age 24

Compare Stats

1. Joe DiMaggio (928) *

2. Jimmie Foxx (912) *

3. Ted Williams (903) *

4. Vladimir Guerrero (888)

5. Frank Robinson (887) *

6. Hal Trosky (882)

7. Hank Aaron (876) *

8. Joe Medwick (868) *

9. Orlando Cepeda (867) *

10. Ken Griffey Jr. (862)

 

Most Similar by Age

 

21. Joe DiMaggio (961)

22. Joe DiMaggio (938)

23. Joe DiMaggio (951)

24. Joe DiMaggio (928)

Okay there is some debate if he's really 24 but god damn.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a few, Al. Apologies if I've written repeats accidentally:

 

- Joe Carter

- Cito Gaston (Manager)

- Dave Stewart

- Larry Walker

- Felipe Alou (Manager)

- Dave Van Horne (Broadcaster, Expos, since Treble mentioned Cheek for the Jays)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Here's a few, Al. Apologies if I've written repeats accidentally:

 

- Joe Carter

- Cito Gaston (Manager)

- Dave Stewart

- Larry Walker

- Felipe Alou (Manager)

- Dave Van Horne (Broadcaster, Expos, since Treble mentioned Cheek for the Jays)

Carter no. His OBP was abysmal, and his slugging pct. wasn't in the top 100.

 

Gaston no.

 

Dave Stewart no. 168 wins is not enough without a spectacular win percentage.

 

I'm fairly sure I covered Walker earlier. He's got the best case of anyone on the list, but I can't endorse him.

 

Alou no. He's been good, but not HOF good.

 

Van Horne I can't make a judgement on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Anglesault

I'm serious, not just being bitter.

 

Will the memory of the monumental Yankee Meltdown of 04 have a negative affect on any "borderline" HOFers on this team?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm serious, not just being bitter.

 

Will the memory of the monumental Yankee Meltdown of 04 have a negative affect on any "borderline" HOFers on this team?

None at all. No one holds the collapse of 1978 against the Red Sox, and I've never heard of a player excluded from the Hall solely due to a bad postseason performance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow. Way to throw me a curveball Verne. Like the broadcasters, the writers have their own wing of the Hall. I think James belongs there. No baseball writer has done more to influence the game in the last half-decade than James.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If Mazzone was inducted, his plaque needs to be a hollogram of some sort which shows him rocking back and forth as you change the angle that you're looking at it from.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bernie Williams

Jorge Posada

Bernie I covered on page one. He doesn't quite have the numbers.

 

Posada no. He's never led the league in anything, and he's been to just four All-Star games. If he posts a .400 OBP for the next five years, he'll get consideration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not saying Posada is a HOF but if fairness to him the majority of HOF catchers never led the league in anything including Yogi Berra. The three MVP's of course helped him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Larry Walker deserves a little more consideration, personally:

 

3 Batting Titles

7 Gold Gloves

.314 Career BA

228 SB, to match 368 HR

1997 MVP (the year he almost hit the triple crown)

55th all time in On-Base Percentage

76th all time in Adjusted OPS+ (which considers park factors)

 

He passes the HOF Monitor by a wide margin (147 to 100), he meets the HOF Standards Test (52.8 to ~50), and four out of his top five comps are current Hall of Famers. He's not a first ballot guy, but I say he gets in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest The Shadow Behind You

I say if Larry Walker can have another couple good productive years, He can slide in and he can get rid of that "coors field element". The next two seasons will make or break his chances.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think Larry Walker deserves a little more consideration, personally:

 

3 Batting Titles

7 Gold Gloves

.314 Career BA

228 SB, to match 368 HR

1997 MVP (the year he almost hit the triple crown)

55th all time in On-Base Percentage

76th all time in Adjusted OPS+ (which considers park factors)

 

He passes the HOF Monitor by a wide margin (147 to 100), he meets the HOF Standards Test (52.8 to ~50), and four out of his top five comps are current Hall of Famers. He's not a first ballot guy, but I say he gets in.

Yo have to throw the HOF Standards measurements out the window for Walker. They are not adjusted for park factors, and you know the voters are taking that into account. Win Shares gives Walker about 297 shares for his career (I don't have the exact figures handy). There are alot of borderline guys at 320-330. If Walker can avoid the injury bug and put together 2-3 productive seasons, as Shadow stated, he will garner more consideration.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×