Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
Guest Nanks

Election result lies with The Pack

Recommended Posts

Guest Nanks

Since voters elected Franklin Roosevelt to his first of four terms in 1932, the Redskins have forecasted the next President. Over the past 18 elections, a Redskins win the weekend before Election Day has preceded a win by the incumbent party. On the other hand, a Redskins loss before the vote has preceded a loss by the incumbent party.

 

This really doesn't belong in either CE or Sports so I figured here would do. Now whilst I realise that 76% of all people realise statistics can be made up to prove anything, I still found this mildly interesting.

 

The question is, is MikeSC a Packers man???

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Agent of Oblivion

If that's true, it's a fascinating fact. Is there a page connected to that that shows the Skins' w-l record before an election, and the election results?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Nanks

No, I didn't explore it further. I probably should've sourced that, it's from the Packers official website.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We get the 2000 Election part II. :ph34r: Actually, we're probably getting that anyway.

 

As much as I loathe the Redskins, I have to root for them this weekend. Thankfully, the Packers have a bad rushing defense, so maybe Clinton (OMG another presidential reference~!!!11) Portis can own them on the ground.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Smues

Well I voted for Bush (good absentee ballot) but the Redskins aren't winning this weekend. And Bush probably isn't either. Bah

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thankfully, the Packers have a bad rushing defense, so maybe Clinton (OMG another presidential reference~!!!11) Portis can own them on the ground.

Yeah, but the Redskins will still have a crappy season and Joe Gibbs will get...

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

impeached (omgroflmao2004...)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Take a look at this thread I posted..

 

To go a long with this, don't forget that every wartime President has been re-elected only to either die or be forced out of office during his 2nd term (or in Madison's case have both his VPs die).

 

Oh, and since I hate the Redskins..go Packers regardless.

 

Wasn't George Sr a wartime President?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Agent of Oblivion

I like random presidential patterns and such. I'd forgotten about that thread.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC
Snopes: Washington Redskins

 

The Urban Legends Reference Page says it's true as well.

Too bad they're incorrect.

 

The last game the Redskins played in 1996 before the election was 11/3, against Buffalo. And they lost 38-13.

-=Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC
That was a road game, though. The pattern is dependant on the 'Skins last home game.

Doesn't really say that --- however, it does make the pattern even more useless.

-=Mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's on the Snopes site:

 

"A recent item of this ilk maintains that the results of the last game played at home by the NFL's Washington Redskins (a football team based in the national capital, Washington, D.C.) before the U.S. presidential elections has accurately foretold the winner of the last fifteen of those political contests, going back to 1944."

 

It's kind of interesting.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Take a look at this thread I posted..

 

To go a long with this, don't forget that every wartime President has been re-elected only to either die or be forced out of office during his 2nd term (or in Madison's case have both his VPs die).

 

Oh, and since I hate the Redskins..go Packers regardless.

 

Wasn't George Sr a wartime President?

I think the Gulf War was over before the elections in 1992.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×