The Thank GOD the election is over thread

[Guest MikeSC]

Fuck's sake, its two days after the election and people are already assuming that the 3.5 million people were religious anti-gay/abortion/whatever that came out for Bush. It's too early god damn it.

ah okay... so it can be assumed that the majority of Kerry voters were voting Kerry because they were "anti-Bush" but we can't assume that a majority of Bush supporters in the south were doing so based on family values (anti-gay is listed in the family value handbook nowdays it seems)?

 

Double standard?

Actually, it's safe to say that a large chunk of Kerry voters voted against Bush because every poll of them taken indicated that at least 50% voted for Kerry simply because they disliked Bush.

-=Mike

[Guest MikeSC]

Are you watching the news, Cerebus?  Everyone's already trying to put a super negative spin on the new term before it even begins. 

 

Don't expect anything less from the rest of the libs anywhere else.

Let them, it'll just mean more election wins for the Republicans if the DNC yet again doesn't figure out why they aren't doing well.

You want some shocking news?

Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe is already looking past Bush’s second term.

 

“This party is stronger than it’s ever been. We’re in the best financial shape,” he says. “We now have, unlike four years ago, millions and millions of new supporters of this party. We’re debt-free for the first time ever and we’re beginning to build towards 2008.”

http://news.ncmonline.com/news/view_articl...92d41abfd6ae0ea

Yes, three straight electoral losses --- all increasingly worse --- means that the Dems are in better shape than ever.

 

Blue staters --- when you lose in 2006, keep McAwful's words in mind.

-=Mike

[Dr. Tyler; Captain America 0]

Increasingly worse, but you're completely blowing this victory out of proportion.

 

Historically, it's a pathetic win for an incumbent to only get 51% -- 3% better than the challenger -- and 280 electoral votes.

[MrRant 0]

How are the parties in debt?

 

Hookers and blow?

[Guest MikeSC]

Increasingly worse, but you're completely blowing this victory out of proportion.

 

Historically, it's a pathetic win for an incumbent to only get 51% -- 3% better than the challenger -- and 280 electoral votes.

I can name an incumbant that didn't get 51% against his challenger.

 

And he didn't have a recession to overcome, nor an unpopular war to deal with.

-=Mike

[bob_barron 0]

::Jeopardy mode on::

 

Who is Bill Clinton

 

::Jeopardy mode off::

[Guest Vitamin X]

The war wasn't that unpopular. The polls I was seeing said it was right down the middle as of late (49/49 with a 2% margin of error), and I don't believe the recession has still been "overcome". Unemployment is still high and the war is still costing us plenty of money.

 

I think the Bush campaign simply just outperformed the Kerry campaign in many ways. I don't remember a single one of Kerry's commercials, but Bush's ads stick out in my mind (the use of the phrase "I'm George W. Bush and I approve this message" seems a bit cheesy, but it really has worked).

[bob_barron 0]

I think it was federal law to say I'm George W. Bush etc as part of new campaign rules. You have to say who approved what and all that.

 

I know Charles Schumer did the same for his ads.

[Guest MikeSC]

The war wasn't that unpopular. The polls I was seeing said it was right down the middle as of late (49/49 with a 2% margin of error), and I don't believe the recession has still been "overcome". Unemployment is still high and the war is still costing us plenty of money.

 

I think the Bush campaign simply just outperformed the Kerry campaign in many ways. I don't remember a single one of Kerry's commercials, but Bush's ads stick out in my mind (the use of the phrase "I'm George W. Bush and I approve this message" seems a bit cheesy, but it really has worked).

Um, even 50/50 is DAMNED unpopular for a war. Unemployment is, historically, exceptionally low.

 

Bush won not solely because of tactics --- he won because people LIKE his plan.

 

They didn't like --- or even know --- Kerry's.

-=Mike

[MrRant 0]

I didn't know what Kerry's plan was so that would have been my reason for not voting for him. I tried to find something concrete.

[2GOLD 0]

Can't believe Kerry pimped his plan for three months and then didn't tell us what his plan was.

 

You would have thought someone would have tapped him on the shoulder and went, "maybe you should tell them your plan now?"

 

Cause dammit, I HAD MONEY ON THAT PLAN!

I put down 20 bucks it involved Nazi gold and the bastard didn't even tell his plan. 20 bucks WASTED.

[Dr. Tyler; Captain America 0]

It's easy to get >50% when there is no 3rd party challenger to speak of.

[CBright7831 0]

I'm glad it's over, and I'm glad the outcome came out the way it did, and not as I predicted.

[Guest MikeSC]

It's easy to get >50% when there is no 3rd party challenger to speak of.

Even easier when most of the people side with you.

-=Mike

[Dr. Tyler; Captain America 0]

Uh, okay.

 

You missed my point, but as you so often do, I'll leave it at that.

[Gary Floyd 0]

Wow, what happened to everyone's sense of humor?

 

Remember, Bob Backlund in '08! Vote for him Plebians!

[Guest Vitamin X]

The war wasn't that unpopular. The polls I was seeing said it was right down the middle as of late (49/49 with a 2% margin of error), and I don't believe the recession has still been "overcome". Unemployment is still high and the war is still costing us plenty of money.

 

I think the Bush campaign simply just outperformed the Kerry campaign in many ways. I don't remember a single one of Kerry's commercials, but Bush's ads stick out in my mind (the use of the phrase "I'm George W. Bush and I approve this message" seems a bit cheesy, but it really has worked).

Um, even 50/50 is DAMNED unpopular for a war. Unemployment is, historically, exceptionally low.

 

Bush won not solely because of tactics --- he won because people LIKE his plan.

 

They didn't like --- or even know --- Kerry's.

-=Mike

Even if it's comparatively unpopular, 50/50 is still just that- right down the middle.

 

I'm also starting to talk to a lot of Bush supporters who actually claim much of the same thing many Kerry supporters had been saying, that no matter how bad Bush is, Kerry would be even worse. Not sure if that would qualify as people liking his plan.

 

I thought Kerry had made his plan clear(er) in the debates? Healthcare would be more federally controlled, and the idea with the war on terrorism was to have multinational talks with North Korea and consult with allies before taking any further military action to improve our standing amongst the world.

 

He didn't however, to my knowledge, outline his plan for Iraq, though.