Guest MikeSC Report post Posted November 5, 2004 Laura's a babe (for an old chick). Oddly enough, I'm trying to think of liberal bitches that I like, but sadly I can't think of anyone. Would saying that I don't worship Ann Coulter, and don't like Laua Ingram and Monica Crowley help? All first ladies are supposed to do is pick some hippie social cause and give it publicity... I like Coulter. She's bloody hilarious. -=Mike ...Of course, if I was lib, I'd loathe her. With a passion... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted November 5, 2004 Laura Bush, to my knowledge, does almost nothing as first lady. I've never even heard her speak. Better to be thought a fool and stay silent than to open one's mouth and remove all doubt, I guess. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Loss Report post Posted November 5, 2004 Ann Coulter, Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh should all burn nicely in Hell. Of course, I'd say the same for Michael Moore. I'm indifferent toward Al Franken. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest thebigjig Report post Posted November 5, 2004 Laura's a babe (for an old chick). Oddly enough, I'm trying to think of liberal bitches that I like, but sadly I can't think of anyone. Would saying that I don't worship Ann Coulter, and don't like Laua Ingram and Monica Crowley help? All first ladies are supposed to do is pick some hippie social cause and give it publicity... Laura looks like she's on pain medication and booze. She always has a glassy, dim witted look in her eyes... as if no ones behind the wheel. Being fair, I think Teresa looks like a chimp... with the only good quality being her Ursella Andress foreign Bond girl voice Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Loss Report post Posted November 5, 2004 From the Margaret Cho show I saw Saturday night: "Teresa Heinz-Kerry is HOT. She has this whole 'I'm-going-through-menopause-at-my-own-pace-and-if-you-don't-like-it-fuck-you' thing going for her that's very sexy. She's very sultry. I don't think Laura Bush is hot. I think she's very pretty, but I'd imagine her pussy tastes like Lysol." Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted November 5, 2004 From the Margaret Cho show I saw Saturday night: "Teresa Heinz-Kerry is HOT. She has this whole 'I'm-going-through-menopause-at-my-own-pace-and-if-you-don't-like-it-fuck-you' thing going for her that's very sexy. She's very sultry. I don't think Laura Bush is hot. I think she's very pretty, but I'd imagine her pussy tastes like Lysol." If anybody knows what it's like to not look hot, Cho would be the expert I'd turn to. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted November 5, 2004 From the Margaret Cho show I saw Saturday night: "Teresa Heinz-Kerry is HOT. She has this whole 'I'm-going-through-menopause-at-my-own-pace-and-if-you-don't-like-it-fuck-you' thing going for her that's very sexy. She's very sultry. I don't think Laura Bush is hot. I think she's very pretty, but I'd imagine her pussy tastes like Lysol." Well I guess Margaret Cho settles this debate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted November 5, 2004 So basically... Laura knows her role, shuts her mouth and if not for the well equipped kitchen staff, would have breakfast on the table every morning? Huh? I just think she looks good, hippie. And I do think Coulter can say some funny-ass shit, but the problem is I don't want to wade through the 10 minutes of stuff she'll say prior to the good one-liner. Gag. Margaret Cho. Gag... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Loss Report post Posted November 5, 2004 Margaret Cho settles all debates, actually. I worship her toes. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted November 5, 2004 Margaret Cho settles all debates, actually. I worship her toes. Well, if you focus on her toes, you can ignore the hideousness of the rest of her body. -=Mike ...You still haven't explained why Keyes blames you for anything... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Loss Report post Posted November 5, 2004 Because I'm not Keyes ... I don't know. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted November 5, 2004 Because I'm not Keyes ... I don't know. Can't you at least fake enough psychotic thought to fake it? -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted November 5, 2004 Well, if you focus on her toes, you can ignore the hideousness of the rest of her body. That line is almost as good as your Pam Anderson one-liner about how she likes her men... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted November 5, 2004 Hillary would be a worse candidate than Kerry. Here's one person who could make a good candidate, if he keeps his job in 2006: Governor Brad Henry of Oklahoma From his site: Brad Henry was officially sworn in as Oklahoma's 26th governor on January 13, 2003. A third generation Oklahoman, he was born in Shawnee, Oklahoma, where he attended public schools and graduated from Shawnee High School. The governor attended the University of Oklahoma as a President's Leadership Scholar and earned a bachelor's degree in economics in 1985. In 1988, Governor Henry was awarded his law degree from the University of Oklahoma College of Law, where he served as managing editor of the Law Review. Governor Henry returned to Shawnee to practice law with his father, Charles, and start a family. He married the former Kim Blain, a Shawnee school teacher, and they have three lovely daughters, Leah, Laynie and Baylee. Before his election as governor, Brad Henry served ten years in the Oklahoma State Senate, chairing the Senate Judiciary Committee and serving as vice-chair of the Senate Economic Development Committee. As a gubernatorial candidate in 2002, his campaign themes focused on strengthening education, providing quality health care, and ensuring greater economic opportunities. His refreshing approach connected with voters. Brad Henry surprised many political pundits, winning the election in November, 2002. Governor Henry took office in the midst of the worst budget crisis in state history, but forged a historic bipartisan agreement among legislative leaders that shielded education and health care from massive cuts. He also successfully fought to let voters decide whether to establish an education lottery to benefit the state's classrooms. Other highlights of his first year in office include augmenting early childhood education, medical malpractice tort reform, sensible restrictions on public smoking, zero-based budgeting, and a funding solution to retain the state's only level-one trauma center. Governor Henry’s second-year agenda proved to be even more ambitious. Bolstering public education, he crafted a five-year strategy to raise the pay of Oklahoma teachers to at least match the regional average. Additionally, the governor fought to let Oklahomans decide whether to enact a tribal gaming regulation act that would pump millions of dollars into state classrooms while helping revive the beleaguered horserace industry. Governor Henry also secured an upcoming statewide vote to fund several vital healthcare initiatives through a modest increase in the tobacco tax. If approved by voters, the measure also provides targeted tax cuts, particularly an elimination of the capital gains tax on all Oklahoma property held for five years or more. Other highlights of his second year in office include: additional tort reform, Medicaid screening for breast and cervical cancer, voluntary relocation assistance for the troubled Tar Creek region, expansion of preschool programs and a landmark anti-methamphetamine law that has become a model for the rest of the nation. Despite the demands of office, Brad Henry remains a committed family man. The Henrys have long been active members of the Shawnee community, participating in a number of civic organizations and local causes. They are also members of the First Baptist Church of Shawnee where both have served as Sunday school teachers. Gov. Henry also serves the church as an ordained deacon. Governor Henry is working to build a better Oklahoma by strengthening the state public education system and making health care more accessible and affordable to the citizenry. In his inaugural address, he urged citizens to celebrate Oklahoma's many accomplishments, put aside their differences and rally together for the good of their beloved state. As he often likes to say, "We are all Oklahomans first." from the Almanac of American Politics: the favorite for the Democratic nomination was Oklahoma City area restaurateur Vince Orza, a former Republican who lost the 1990 Republican runoff for governor by a 51%-49% margin. Henry was not sure whether to run; he did not announce until the breathtakingly late date of June 24. But he had a good campaign plan. He had one big issue (a lottery to fund education), one big vehicle (an RV in which he traveled around the state) and one big endorser (former University of Oklahoma and Dallas Cowboys football coach Barry Switzer). Voters may not be much interested in meeting politicians, but Oklahoma voters are very interested in meeting football coaches. "We like to roll into Wal-Mart parking lots and just cause a commotion," Henry said. "I've been amazed at how people are starved for personal contact." Henry's folksy, aw-shucks manner appealed to rural voters when the other major figures in gubernatorial politics--Keating, Largent, Orza--were from Oklahoma's two major cities. (..) Against Largent in the general, there were clear contrasts. Largent opposed the lottery, called for moving from the income tax to consumption taxes over the next 10 years, and eliminating the sales tax on food. Henry was for across-the-board teacher salary increases and against merit pay--the teachers' union positions--while Largent took the other side on both. Largent, as Keating did, called for cutting administrative costs in schools; some rural Oklahomans feared that meant consolidating small school districts. Henry thought the University of Oklahoma and Oklahoma State University should be able to increase tuition more than 7% a year; Largent did not. And there was another issue that didn't qualify for the ballot until August 20: Whether to ban cockfighting. In urban Oklahoma this was a popular stand; Keating endorsed it and so did Largent. But it was highly unpopular in Little Dixie in southeastern Oklahoma, where cockfighting is part of local culture. As one enthusiast told a reporter: "It's a hobby my kids won't get to do. It hurts me that Jacky Lee can't be a cockfighter." Henry came out against the cockfighting ban. Brad Henry in 2008! (just ignore that cockfighting stuff) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted November 5, 2004 Hey Rob, your buddy from OK won... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted November 5, 2004 Hey Rob, your buddy from OK won... 42% for Brad Carson wasn't too bad when you consider that Bush won every county in Oklahoma Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted November 5, 2004 Hey Rob, your buddy from OK won... 42% for Brad Carson wasn't too bad when you consider that Bush won every county in Oklahoma You'd be wise to make sure that Kos doesn't pimp for him. That man is the kiss of death. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted November 5, 2004 So he was a good loser -- you should be proud... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted November 5, 2004 Hey Rob, your buddy from OK won... 42% for Brad Carson wasn't too bad when you consider that Bush won every county in Oklahoma You'd be wise to make sure that Kos doesn't pimp for him. That man is the kiss of death. -=Mike I don't think that came up in Oklahoma. Anyways, the targets weren't exactly all picked for ease. Why else would Roy Blunt and Tom DeLay be targeted? DeLay actually had his toughest campaign ever, but Blunt rolled over Newberry. As for a curse. There's nothing to really suggest that. Stephanie Herseth (D-SD) and Ben Chandler (D-KY) both had links to these fundraising efforts. Some of us are not totally sure about how much time over the next 2 years should be spent on figuring out what in the hell to do. So he was a good loser -- you should be proud Carson gained 92,000 more votes than Kerry in Oklahoma. Coburn ran about 200,000 votes behind Bush. Considering the circumstances, it wasn't a disaster Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest MikeSC Report post Posted November 5, 2004 Hey Rob, your buddy from OK won... 42% for Brad Carson wasn't too bad when you consider that Bush won every county in Oklahoma You'd be wise to make sure that Kos doesn't pimp for him. That man is the kiss of death. -=Mike I don't think that came up in Oklahoma. Anyways, the targets weren't exactly all picked for ease. Why else would Roy Blunt and Tom DeLay be targeted? DeLay actually had his toughest campaign ever, but Blunt rolled over Newberry. As for a curse. There's nothing to really suggest that. Stephanie Herseth (D-SD) and Ben Chandler (D-KY) both had links to these fundraising efforts. Some of us are not totally sure about how much time over the next 2 years should be spent on figuring out what in the hell to do. His picks weren't done for success, since the success of his candidates was laughably weak. My advice to leftists --- abandon the Soros-funded (and, judging by the rather large "let's secede" types, fairly anti-American) echo chamber and try to figure out why the majority doesn't side with you. Demonizing a very decent and honorable guy in Bush didn't really pay dividends. Conservatives have HAD to deal with the left from the beginnings of our movement. That is why OUR movement had succeeded and the attempt to reproduce a successful liberal movement will not. -=Mike Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob E Dangerously 0 Report post Posted November 5, 2004 The "Why did Americans vote for him, what's wrong with them" attitude is a lot like blaming the players when the coaches and their plans are the problem. Nothing's really achieved by the "They're idiots" method. There's a lot of people out there who could vote for the Democratic party, but for some reasons, they choose not to vote for John Kerry. My general candidate for 2008 is someone who can be considered likeable and able to do a good job. Just watch Brad Henry lose in 2006 and screw my plan up. The 2008 primaries will be an epic bloodbath for the first two primaries, then we'll know who the nominees are. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2GOLD 0 Report post Posted November 5, 2004 If they pick ANOTHER god damn Northeastern Democrat, it's going to be a short race. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SuperJerk 0 Report post Posted December 5, 2008 This thread is unintentional comedy gold. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
treble 0 Report post Posted December 5, 2008 And I think he would be one of those Dems who I may not vote for (it would depend on the GOP opponent), but wouldn't mind being represented by him... Good news... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bobobrazil1984 0 Report post Posted December 5, 2008 Lol nice bump. It's hilarious to see the right wingers conversing each other, trying so hard to make themselves sounds "sensible" and 'rational'. It's amazing, all the Republican women are AWESOME and the Democrat women are all AWFUL but really it has absolutely nothing to do with partisan politics! NO REALLY! They just have no merit! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CheesalaIsGood 0 Report post Posted December 5, 2008 Wow and awesome. I'm not sure when kkk would find time to be a bitch for Condi when he has MikeSC cock glazing his tonsils. Thanks for the bump. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
