Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Report post Posted January 3, 2005 Nope...thought the Jacksonville game was final. Oakland needs to score a TD for that not to be true. How the fuck did Oakland not punch that shit in? Fuck, now its 4th and goal. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Report post Posted January 3, 2005 FUCK Oakland is so useless. I have been shafted and edged out of everything this year. I've only decisively lsot like once or twice. FUCK Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChris 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 Wow. Sacked. NOW it's official. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Report post Posted January 3, 2005 Honest to God, how did Oakland choke on Jacksonville's goal line twice? TWICE?! Barring his death, Bravesfan better ahve a good fucking reason for using his emergency picks. Seriously. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChris 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 Thank God I got the bye. I did NOT want to have to pick next week's games. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vern Gagne 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 I think this is the NFC Atlanta 13-3 Green Bay 12-4 Arizona 11-5 New York Giants 10-6 St.Louis 9-6-1 Detroit 9-7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CanadianChris 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 AFC looks like this, I believe: 1) Cleveland 10-6 2) Denver 10-6 3) Buffalo 10-6 4) Houston 10-6 5) Tennessee 9-7 6) New England 9-7 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Chuck Woolery 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 Well, at least one incarnation of the Titans made the playoffs... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 AFC looks like this, I believe: 1) Cleveland 10-6 2) Denver 10-6 3) Buffalo 10-6 4) Houston 10-6 5) Tennessee 9-7 6) New England 9-7 No, I'm 99% sure I goofed up Chuck's stats. He's 10-6, not 9-7, and beat Bored to take first in the division. Buffalo, New England, Cleveland, Houston, Tenn and Denver are in the AFC playoffs. All but New England has a 10-6 record. I'm going to back-check each of the team's records before going any further, but it looks like Bob will be the fourth seed, and there's a three-way-tie for the first three seeds. It looks like I'll have to go through several layers of tie-breakers, with the deciding factor being strength of victory between CLE, DEN, and TENN... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lightning Flik 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 Ok FIVE TEAMS tied with 10-6 in the AFC Ok, that's just flipping nuts. Have fun with those tiebreakers kkk. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Report post Posted January 3, 2005 HONESTLY HOW FUCKING SUTING IS IT THAT I LOST OUT OF THE PLAYOFFS BY ONE GAME BECAUSE SOME FAGGOT USED HIS EMERGENCY PICKS. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 No you lost because you didn't win enough games to ensure that this kind of thing wouldn't happen... just like I lost because I made stupid picks over the last month or two... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
starvenger 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 Gah!! Lost on the tiebreaker... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Report post Posted January 3, 2005 No you lost because you didn't win enough games to ensure that this kind of thing wouldn't happen... just like I lost because I made stupid picks over the last month or two... Sorry dickhead, I lost by one game at least 4 times. I've had no luck. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fökai 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 Honest to God, how did Oakland choke on Jacksonville's goal line twice? TWICE?! Barring his death, Bravesfan better ahve a good fucking reason for using his emergency picks. Seriously. ...because I was already in the playoffs, and didn't want to jump through rings to attain computer access while I'm in dial-up hell. And to top it off, this would've been the only reason to check the board for the last few weeks or so. My bad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 Honest to God, how did Oakland choke on Jacksonville's goal line twice? TWICE?! Barring his death, Bravesfan better ahve a good fucking reason for using his emergency picks. Seriously. ...because I was already in the playoffs, and didn't want to jump through rings to attain computer access while I'm in dial-up hell. And to top it off, this would've been the only reason to check the board for the last few weeks or so. My bad. You should have just laughed in his face. It's his own damn fault for losing by 1 game every time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Report post Posted January 3, 2005 Honest to God, how did Oakland choke on Jacksonville's goal line twice? TWICE?! Barring his death, Bravesfan better ahve a good fucking reason for using his emergency picks. Seriously. ...because I was already in the playoffs, and didn't want to jump through rings to attain computer access while I'm in dial-up hell. And to top it off, this would've been the only reason to check the board for the last few weeks or so. My bad. You should have just laughed in his face. It's his own damn fault for losing by 1 game every time. Bitch you be Trippin' Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 Touche. I'm just bustin' your balls. I'm still bitter you swept my ass. If I had those two games back, it'd be me in your spot or better. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 Update on AFC playoff picture. First off, here are the final results for the AFC South. Tenn, not Hou, is the Division winner. I had an extra loss for Chuck because I mistook him for Indy one week in which he won and Indy lost. Below is the regular-season record for Tenn and Hou. Because they had split their season series and have the same Division record, the Conference record was the deciding factor, with Chuck winning with a 9-3 record to Bored's 7-5 record. Tenn: Week 1: beat Mia 9-7 (1-0, 0-0 Div., 1-0 Conf.) Week 2: beat Indy 6-4 (2-0, 1-0 Div., 2-0 Conf.) Week 3: lost Jax 7-9 (2-1, 1-1 Div., 2-1 Conf.) Week 4: lost SD 6-7 (2-2, 1-1 Div., 2-2 Conf.) Week 5: lost GB 6-6 + TB (2-3, 1-1 Div., 2-2 Conf.) Week 6: lost Hou 8-8 + TB (2-4, 1-2 Div., 2-3 Conf.) Week 7: lost Minn 5-5 + TB (2-5, 1-2 Div., 2-3 Conf.) Week 8: beat Cin 5-3 (3-5, 1-2 Div., 3-3 Conf.) Week9: BYE Week 10: lost Chi 9-10 (3-6, 1-2 Div., 3-3 Conf.) Week 11: beat Jax 11-7 (4-6, 2-2 Div., 4-3 Conf.) Week 12: beat Hou 11-8 (5-6, 3-2 Div., 5-3 Conf.) Week 13: beat Indy 10-9 (6-6, 4-2 Div., 6-3 Conf.) Week 14: beat KC 9-8 (7-6, 4-2 Div., 7-3 Conf.) Week 15: beat Oak 9-7 (8-6, 4-2 Div., 8-3 Conf.) Week 16: beat Den 7-7 + TB (9-6, 4-2 Div., 9-3 Conf.) Week 17: beat Det 8-4 (10-6, 4-2 Div., 9-3 Conf.) Hou: Week 1: lost SD 7-9 (0-1, 0-0 Div., 0-1 Conf.) Week 2: beat Det 10-8 (1-1, 0-0 Div., 0-1 Conf.) Week 3: beat KC 6-6 + TB (2-1, 0-0 Div., 1-1 Conf.) Week 4: beat Oak 9-8 (3-1, 0-0 Div., 2-1 Conf.) Week 5: lost Min 5-8 (3-2, 0-0 Div., 2-1 Conf.) Week 6: beat Ten 8-8 + TB (4-2, 1-0 Div., 3-1 Conf.) Week 7: BYE Week 8: beat Jax 7-5 (5-2, 2-0 Div., 4-1 Conf.) Week 9: lost Den 6-9 (5-3, 2-0 Div., 4-2 Conf.) Week 10: beat Ind 5-5 + TB (6-3, 3-0 Div., 5-2 Conf.) Week 11: beat GB 9-5 (7-3, 3-0 Div., 5-2 Conf.) Week 12: lost Tenn 8-11 (7-4, 3-1 Div., 5-3 Conf.) Week 13: beat NYJ 13-8 (8-4, 3-1 Div., 6-3 Conf.) Week 14: lost Ind 7-11 (8-5, 3-2 Div., 6-4 Conf.) Week 15: beat Chi 6-4 (9-5, 3-2 Div., 6-4 Conf.) Week 16: beat Jax 11-5 (10-5, 4-2 Div., 7-4 Conf.) Week 17: lost Cle 10-11 (10-6, 4-2 Div., 7-5 Conf) In addition, nl5 got the sixth seed over Bitch due to a better Conference record 7-5 to 6-6. Coming next: the AFC Division seedings. Buffalo, Cleveland, Tenn, and Denver all have 10-6 records. I am now going to use the rules as seen on NFL.com: 1. Apply division tie breaker to eliminate all but the highest-ranked club in each division before proceeding to step 2. The original seeding within a division upon application of the division tie breaker remains the same for all subsequent applications of the procedure that are necessary to identify the two Wild-Card participants. Step 1 does not apply in this case since they are all division winners 2. Head-to-head sweep. (Applicable only if one club has defeated each of the others or if one club has lost to each of the others.) This does not apply because not one team faced off against all the other three. 3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference. Here are the following Conference records: Denver 9-3 Tenn 9-3 Cleveland 9-3 Buffalo 8-4 Buffalo is the fourth seed. 4. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four. There were not four common games between Denver, Tenn and Cleveland. 5. Strength of victory In other words, take the won-loss records of the opponents each team has beaten. Cleveland's wins: Baltimore (8-8) Washington (4-12) Pittsburgh (8-8) Cincy (8-8) NY Jets (6-10) Cincy (8-8) New England (9-7) San Diego (8-8) Miami (4-12) Houston (10-6) Total Record: (73-87) Denver KC (5-11) San Diego (8-8) Tampa Bay (7-9) Oakland (9-7) Houston (10-6) San Diego (8-8) Miami (4-12) KC (5-11) Tenn (10-6) Indy (8-8) Total Record: (74-86) Tenn Miami (4-12) Indy (8-8) Cincy (8-8) Jack (4-12) Houston (10-6) Indy (8-8) KC (5-11) Oakland (9-7) Denver (8-8) Detroit (9-7) Total Recrod: (73-87) Denver has the top seed, so now it's time to go to the Two-team tie-breaking rules. 1. Head-to-head, if applicable. Nope. 2. Best won-lost-tied percentage in games played within the conference. Still tied. 3. Best won-lost-tied percentage in common games, minimum of four. Here we go. The teams are Cincy, San Diego, Miami, and Houston. Jack played Cincy twice, and Chuck played Houston twice, so whoever has the best record against these four opponents gets the second seed: Cleveland: Beat all four opponents and won all five games. Tenn: Beat Cincy, Miami and Houston once. Lost to San Diego and Houston once. Cleveland has the second seed. The AFC seedings are as follows (until I find something else I did wrong...) 1) Denver 2) Cleveland 3) Tenn 4) Buffalo 5) Houston 6) New England Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bob_barron 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 I'm pissed I'm the 4th seed but considering at one point I was 6-6- I'm glad I was able to win out. I wonder what my PF/PA was Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 If you would have won one more conference game and lost a non-conference, I could have figured out your victory strength, too... Playoff matchups: AFC: First week byes: Denver, Cleveland New England @ Tenn Houston @ Buffalo NFC: First week byes: Atlanta, Green Bay Detroit @ Arizona St. Louis @ NY Giants Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bob_barron 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 Since I'm the 4th seed isn't Houston at Buffalo Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 Oops. Sorry. Gotta have that home-field advantage... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lightning Flik 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 So where's the KKK Bowl going to be this year? Or are we just having it at the team with the best overall record in the finals? *grins* Just cause I wanna know these things. GO ATLANTA! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nl5xsk1 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 In addition, nl5 got the sixth seed over Bitch due to a better Conference record 7-5 to 6-6. Let's hear it for the least-deserving playoff team! Man, I barely paid attention to the standings these last few weeks, too ... I had no idea I was even in the playoff hunt, let alone had a legitimate chance of making it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted January 3, 2005 AFC EAST y=Buffalo Bills (bob_barron) 10-6 <PF: 120, PA: 104, AFC: 8-4, NFC: 2-2, Div: 4-2> x=New England Patriots (nl5xsk1) 9-7 <PF: 125, PA: 123, AFC: 8-5, NFC: 1-2, Div: 5-1> New York Jets (Gert T) 6-10 <PF: 118, PA: 123, AFC: 4-9, NFC: 2-1, Div: 2-4> Miami Dolphins (Spaceman Spiff) 4-12 <PF: 121, PA: 126, AFC: 3-9, NFC: 1-3, Div: 3-3> AFC NORTH y=Cleveland Browns (sfaJack) 10-6 <PF: 117, PA: 123, AFC: 9-3, NFC: 1-3, DIV: 4-2> Pittsburgh Steelers (Tyler McClelland) 8-8 <PF: 124, PA: 115, AFC: 5-7, NFC: 3-1, DIV: 3-3> Baltimore Ravens (Dr. Tom) 8-8 <PF: 122, PA: 121, AFC: 6-6, NFC: 2-2, DIV: 3-3> Cincinnati Bengals (Swift Terror) 8-8 <PF: 108, PA: 111, AFC: 5-7, NFC: 3-1, DIV: 2-4> AFC SOUTH y=Tennessee Titans (Chuck Woolery) 10-6 <PF: 126, PA: 110, AFC: 9-3, NFC: 1-3, DIV: 4-2> x=Houston Texans (Bored) 10-6 <PF: 127, PA: 121, AFC: 7-5, NFC: 3-1, DIV: 4-2> Indianapolis Colts (NoCal Mike) 8-8 <PF: 111, PA: 108, AFC: 6-5, NFC: 2-3, DIV: 3-3> Jacksonville Jaguars (Always Pissed Off) 4-12 <PF: 113, PA: 129, AFC: 3-9, NFC: 1-3, DIV: 1-5> AFC WEST y=Denver Broncos (Canadian Chris) 10-6 <PF: 119, PA: 117, AFC: 9-3, NFC: 1-3, DIV: 5-1> Oakland Raiders (The Bitch) 9-7 <PF: 124, PA: 114, AFC: 6-6, NFC: 3-1, DIV: 4-2> San Diego Chargers (Slasher Flick) 8-8 <PF: 117, PA: 113, AFC: 6-6, NFC: 2-2, DIV: 2-4> Kansas City Chiefs (nogoodnick) 5-11 <PF: 112, PA: 123, AFC: 4-8, NFC: 1-3, DIV: 1-5> NFC EAST y=New York Giants (Cartman) 10-6 <PF: 117, PA: 116, AFC: 3-1, NFC: 7-5, DIV: 6-0> Dallas Cowboys (BX) 7-9 <PF: 124, PA: 122, AFC: 2-2, NFC: 4-8, DIV: 3-3> Philadelphia Eagles (MD2020) 5-11 <PF: 106, PA: 122, AFC: 2-2, NFC: 3-9, DIV: 1-5> Washington Redskins (Human Fly) 4-12 <PF: 107, PA: 123, AFC: 0-4, NFC: 4-8 DIV: 2-4> NFC NORTH y=Green Bay Packers (Vitamin X) 12-4 <PF: 124, PA: 117, AFC: 3-1, NFC: 9-3, DIV: 4-2> x=Detroit Lions (bravesfan) 9-7 <PF: 119, PA: 119, AFC: 1-3, NFC: 8-4, DIV: 4-2> Chicago Bears (Agent of Oblivion) 7-9 <PF: 114, PA: 121, AFC: 1-3, NFC: 6-6, DIV: 2-4> Minnesota Vikings (LaParkaMarka) 7-9 <PF: 115, PA: 116, AFC: 4-0, NFC: 3-9, DIV: 2-4> NFC SOUTH y=Atlanta Falcons (Lightning Flik) 13-3 <PF: 125, PA: 107, AFC: 3-1, NFC: 10-2, DIV: 6-0> New Orleans Saints (Flyboy) 8-8 <PF: 119, PA: 131, AFC: 3-1, NFC: 5-7, DIV: 2-4> Tampa Bay Buccaneers (starvenger) 7-9 <PF: 128, PA: 118, AFC: 2-2, NFC: 5-7, DIV: 2-4> Carolina Panthers (Fazzle) 4-11-1 <PF: 99, PA: 123, AFC: 1-2, NFC: 3-9-1, DIV: 2-4> NFC WEST y=Arizona Cardinals (Vern Gagne) 11-5 <PF: 126, PA: 112, AFC: 4-0, NFC: 7-5, DIV: 3-3> x=St. Louis Rams (cerebus316) 9-6-1 <PF: 113, PA: 103, AFC: 3-1, NFC: 6-5-1, DIV: 4-2> San Francisco 49ers (Agent Bond34) 8-8 <PF: 115, PA: 131, AFC: 1-3, NFC: 7-5, DIV: 3-3> Seattle Seahawks (Mr. Rant's hippie EP's) 7-9 <PF: 111, PA: 124, AFC: 1-3, NFC: 6-6, DIV: 1-5> x=clinched playoff spot y=clinched division Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest The Winter Of My Discontent Report post Posted January 3, 2005 In addition, nl5 got the sixth seed over Bitch due to a better Conference record 7-5 to 6-6. Let's hear it for the least-deserving playoff team! Man, I barely paid attention to the standings these last few weeks, too ... I had no idea I was even in the playoff hunt, let alone had a legitimate chance of making it. I missed out on the playoffs in about 10 different ways. Fuck. And had I been in the NFC, I woulda been in. Christ. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lightning Flik 0 Report post Posted January 4, 2005 Well, I managed to go 13-3 this season after having been 7-9 last season. To say I turned things around is an understatement. Although, 20-12 isn't too great overall. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nl5xsk1 0 Report post Posted January 4, 2005 Flik, you're crazy ... 20-12 is a very good record over two years. NFL coaches have been given contract extensions for less than that. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lightning Flik 0 Report post Posted January 4, 2005 That's only a winning % of .625. That isn't very great. Very good as you say, yes. Very great, no. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
