{''({o..o})''} 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2005 You're acting like 99.9% of people aren't hypocritical. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted January 10, 2005 Brock had definate tools and capablities that could have been harnessed beyond the level he was at the time of his departure. I can agree that Brock phyiscally was better than a few other wrestlers. But he only had seemingly one speed. That Goldberg like Come in and beat the shit out of the other person with no chance of any reply from his victim. Brock made improvements in that and with the right people to work with him, namely Angle for one. He was able to expand his matches out. There was definately more work for him to do,and if he returns he will be able to continue it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fökai 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2005 HOW DARE HE LOSE INTEREST IN PROFESSIONAL WRESTLING! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mole 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2005 I'd say that Taker is hands-down a better wrestler than Brock, and Kane ain't that far behind. This has the be the oddest statement of the year. Give me 5, hell make that 3 matches that Taker had that were ****+ WITHOUT being carried. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted January 10, 2005 No, fuck him for being hypocritical about it and supposedly whining to try and get his old job back. He probably needs the money and maybe misses it in someway. I don't blame him It's amazing how wrestling fans can get more serious over events than those who are actually IN the business. if you say Brock Lesnar is Hypocritical in perhaps wanting to return to the WWE, then you'd have to say the same thing about every other wrestler who Ever left the WWF/WWE and then return years later. that is a long list. In the end as far as wrestling goes, unless your body gives out, unless you die, and unless you have a blood feud with a particular promotion you will always return to the WWE in some form or compacity. The WWE is like the Sun and the other little promotions full of past WWE wrestlers and future indi turn WWE wrestlers gravitate around the Sun until they crash back into it.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Salacious Crumb Report post Posted January 10, 2005 I still think that if they hadn't forced Brock into that long feud with Holly that he'd still be there today. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Trivia247 Report post Posted January 10, 2005 I'd say that Taker is hands-down a better wrestler than Brock, and Kane ain't that far behind. This has the be the oddest statement of the year. Give me 5, hell make that 3 matches that Taker had that were ****+ WITHOUT being carried. Hell im a Taker fan and I would never make a Claim that he was better than Any other wrestler in the roster. he probably isn't he simply entertains me. Thats enough. Others need to calm down on the Rederic Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fökai 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2005 I still think that if they hadn't forced Brock into that long feud with Holly that he'd still be there today. Ditto. Honestly, how can you trust a wrestler who legitimate stiffs younger wrestlers, especially when you accidentally broke his neck after he sandbagged you? Did they expect Brock to feel safe working a program with Holly? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bob_barron 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2005 I'd like to think Brock intentionally broke his neck- it would make me think higher of him Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Salacious Crumb Report post Posted January 10, 2005 I still think that if they hadn't forced Brock into that long feud with Holly that he'd still be there today. Ditto. Honestly, how can you trust a wrestler who legitimate stiffs younger wrestlers, especially when you accidentally broke his neck after he sandbagged you? Did they expect Brock to feel safe working a program with Holly? That and I think it was just the last nail in the coffin. He was unhappy and they were completely booking him to look like shit against a mid-carder. Plus he mentioned the final straw was having to fly to South Africa to face Holly. Plus he knew that he had a feud with the Undertaker after Mania which meant even more shitty booking for him. I think had that whole feud not happened that he would've stuck it out but they really did nothing to try and fix his unhappiness. If anything they seemed to shit on him more when he seemed to start having a problem. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CBright7831 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2005 Lesnar was on a $10,000,000 a year contract with WWE Are you sure? According to who? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bob_barron 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2005 You do realise everyone in this thread has refuted that already Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Salacious Crumb Report post Posted January 10, 2005 I don't think any of the wrestlers make 10 mil a year from the WWF. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CBright7831 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2005 You do realise everyone in this thread has refuted that already This is my first time reading it...ever. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CBright7831 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2005 And he refuses to admit when he's incorrect about something and instead argues the point to where it's so annoying that he drives away other posters. Remember Hunter's Torn Quad? The REAL best new poster we've had hear in some time? He left because he was tired of dealing with Jason. What about me? WHAT ABOUT CBRIGHT?!?!? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zyn081 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2005 Not "plenty of other guys on WWE development contracts", I said "plenty of other workers". Samoa Joe comes to mind as one example. I love Joe to death but in WWE he'd look a lot less imposing and better. Burchill is way better. Have you seen the guys moveset? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TheFranchise 0 Report post Posted January 10, 2005 I think we should just have one single poll somewhere on this forum to decide once and for all how many of us want him back and how many don't. Think of all the 'most people want him back' debates we'll save! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The C Man 0 Report post Posted January 11, 2005 Burchill is way better. Have you seen the guys moveset? Hell yeah. Could you imagine him & O'Haire as a tag team? Taking into account his size, I think Burchill is one of the most physically gifted athletes EVER. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
zyn081 0 Report post Posted January 13, 2005 Burchill is way better. Have you seen the guys moveset? Hell yeah. Could you imagine him & O'Haire as a tag team? Taking into account his size, I think Burchill is one of the most physically gifted athletes EVER. That would be so cool. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites