HollywoodSpikeJenkins Posted February 1, 2005 Report Posted February 1, 2005 Ashes to Ashes 2004 – Clusterfuck 2005 November 7, 2004 – January 30, 2005 Champion’s List SWF World Heavyweight Champion: Sacred SWF Intercontinental-Television Champion: Landon "La Cucaracha" Maddix SWF United States Junior League Champion: Landon "La Cucaracha" Maddix SWF Hardcore Gamers Champion: “The Urban Legend” Todd Cortez SWF Cruiserweight Champion: “Hollywood” Spike Jenkins SWF Tag Team Champions: Wild and Dangerous (Wildchild and Johnny Dangerous) SWF Women’s Champion: Kelly Connelly Rankings 1. Landon "La Cucaracha" Maddix (40 points) 2. Sacred (23 points) 3. “The Perfect Storm” Sean Davis (23 points) 4. “The Urban Legend” Todd Cortez (22 points) 5. Toxxic (19 points) 6. "Hollywood" Spike Jenkins (18 points) 7. Johnny Dangerous (18 points) 8. The Icon" Max King (14 points) 9. Alan Clark (12 points) 10. Wildchild (10 points) 11. Kaine (4 points) 12. Manson (4 points) 13. Stryke (4 points) 14. Carnage (4 points) 15. Munich (2 points) 16. Danny Dagda (2 points) 17. Austin Sly (---) 18. Dace Night (---) 19. Dominic Korgath (---) 20. Mak Francis (---) Point System ----------------- (1) 2 points for win (2) 0 points for loss/double no show (3) 2 points for winning HGC, CW, USJL, or Tag Titles (4) 3 points for winning ICTV Title (5) 5 points for winning the World Title (6) 10 Points for Clusterfuck win (7) Additional 1 point for defending a title (8) Additional 1 point for winning a multi man match.
Secret Agent Posted February 2, 2005 Report Posted February 2, 2005 Holy hell, Landon has 40 points! How far back does this go?
HollywoodSpikeJenkins Posted February 2, 2005 Author Report Posted February 2, 2005 It goes from Ashes 2 Ashes. So in there is a World Title win AND The Clusterfuck win. Which brings me to a question. Do you guys still want me to roll the points over from previous rankings, or start fresh after every PPV? And I didn't really fix these rankings up (top 5 analysis, previous spots, etc) cause well...I didn't feel like it. I might fix them up at some point though.
Cuban Linx Posted February 2, 2005 Report Posted February 2, 2005 Hooray for being 1/10th as good as Landon.
Toxxic Posted February 2, 2005 Report Posted February 2, 2005 I say start new from each PPV. That way we know who the top wrestler is for each PPV cycle. Otherwise Scott Pretzel could come in and beat everyone this month, but despite being best performing wrestler with all wins, he wouldn't have as many point as the people on top.
TheBostonStrangler Posted February 2, 2005 Report Posted February 2, 2005 I think that you forgot to put Galatea in the #1 position. Because he's always #1. Old skool!
Toshiaki Koala Posted February 3, 2005 Report Posted February 3, 2005 I say start new from each PPV. That way we know who the top wrestler is for each PPV cycle. Otherwise Scott Pretzel could come in and beat everyone this month, but despite being best performing wrestler with all wins, he wouldn't have as many point as the people on top. Now that you put it that way... Let's keep things the way they are!
Secret Agent Posted February 3, 2005 Report Posted February 3, 2005 Well, Spike, I think if you roll everything from the previous months you need to include a way to loose points as well, to make it fairer for newer people like Pretzel, etc. It'd be rather easy to do, just reverse the way you award points to this: (1) 0 points for loss/double no show (2) -2 points for losing HGC, CW, USJL, or Tag Titles (3) -3 points for losing ICTV Title (4) -5 points for losing the World Title Either way is easy, but a total, yearly ranking would add a nice touch to this. Also maybe add an extra point for winning contenderships and stuff like the CFC.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now