Guest Cerebus Report post Posted February 3, 2005 There is a great article at the The New Republic but paid registration is required so I'll post highlights: Powell's time at the FCC has, of course, been buffeted by controversy. He managed to irk both free speech advocates and family values groups with his rulings on broadcast indecency...But while everyone in Washington and the world of media awaits the appointment of the un-Powell, they may be missing something important: The most likely successor--everyone from The New York Times to Communications Daily has pegged him as the next chairman--is current FCC commissioner Kevin Martin. And he would probably be much worse. ... Testifying before the House Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet, he [Martin] made clear that higher fines and more explicit prohibitions were his prescriptions for combating on-air indecency. But more remarkably, he also called for the FCC to extend its dominion over cable and satellite operators if they "refuse to offer parents more tools such as family-friendly programming packages." Martin has also frequently dissented from commission rulings that deny complaints of indecency, including a recent dismissal of 36 objections to shows like "Friends," "NYPD Blue," and "The Simpsons." Martin's aggressive campaign to define indecency may have exhausted Powell, who has warned broadcasters not to demand "a red book of what the government says you can and cannot say," but it has earned him an endorsement from the Parents Television Council, a watchdog group that generates 99 percent of the complaints the FCC receives. According to PTC President L. Brent Bozell, Martin "is a stalwart leader on the issue of indecency and would make a superb Chairman," particularly in contrast to Powell, who, according to Bozell, made "bestiality, masturbation, oral sex, anal sex and pedophilia ... FCC-sanctioned topics on prime time network television." In other parts of the article, it notes that Powell's efforts at media deregulation were easily stymied by the courts and by Congress. However, efforts by Martin to satisfy morons like Bozell are much harder, costlier, and time consuming to fight than deregulation. So if you thought Powell was bad, get ready for worse. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CheesalaIsGood 0 Report post Posted February 3, 2005 Sad, but expected considering the climate these days. There's always cable. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2GOLD 0 Report post Posted February 3, 2005 There is bestiality on Prime Time Television? Which show was this??? Did Lucy Camden get humped by Mr Ed in a crossover episode?? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Special K 0 Report post Posted February 3, 2005 Maybe not, according to the article. Get ready to say goodbye to The Shield, Rescue Me and Nip/Tuck Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Cerebus Report post Posted February 3, 2005 If this fucker tries to touch The Shield I'll go ballistic. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Amazing Rando 0 Report post Posted February 3, 2005 The PTC is HORRIBLE in taking things way too literally all the time. Sarcasm is lost on them, and they apparently hate the word "dick" even when used as a general insult such as "that guy is such a dick". So for bestiality, it could have been some stupid comeback like "why don't you go sleep with your dog?", maybe in a "get out of this house" type reference taken to a different level by the PTC. Those guys are insane. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest BDC Report post Posted February 3, 2005 PTC ranks right up there in my book with PETA. Screw 'em both. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Special K 0 Report post Posted February 3, 2005 This is the group that counted every X-Pac crotch chop (of which he would do, like 5 in a row) as a reference to oral sex. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NoCalMike 0 Report post Posted February 3, 2005 As if the worst problems are even going to be about fines and indecency. I can't wait to hear his ideas on de-regulating even MORE media outlets. Ugh..... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Cerebus Report post Posted February 3, 2005 Actually, the parts of the article I didn't post said that Martin was one of the few voices on the FCC that voted against deregulation and was an arch opponent of it. I'll give him credit for that, but as the author notes, its easier to fight deregulation than it is "indecency" stuff. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrRant 0 Report post Posted February 3, 2005 Maybe not, according to the article. Get ready to say goodbye to The Shield, Rescue Me and Nip/Tuck Those on FX. Which is a cable channel. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Special K 0 Report post Posted February 4, 2005 Those on FX. Which is a cable channel. *Sigh* There's always cable. Maybe not, according to the article. Get ready to say goodbye to The Shield, Rescue Me and Nip/Tuck From the article: But more remarkably, he also called for the FCC to extend its dominion over cable and satellite operators if they "refuse to offer parents more tools such as family-friendly programming packages." I wonder what shows they'll go after if they start regulating cable? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrRant 0 Report post Posted February 4, 2005 They won't. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dr. Tyler; Captain America 0 Report post Posted February 4, 2005 One would think Constitutional Law would have dominion over the FCC's interest in tyranny. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NoCalMike 0 Report post Posted February 4, 2005 It really depends though. The cycle of the last four years may continue which is, networks want more power, thus stay bush-friendly in news and reporting, thus Bush throws them back a bone by pressuring the FCC to back off. Who knows. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Cerebus Report post Posted February 4, 2005 It really depends though. The cycle of the last four years may continue which is, networks want more power, thus stay bush-friendly in news and reporting, thus Bush throws them back a bone by pressuring the FCC to back off. Who knows. You're assuming they are Bush friendly, when the chief of the CNN news division claims that the US military is kidnapping, torturing, and targeting journalists for killing in Iraq its a hard claim to swallow. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AndrewTS 0 Report post Posted February 4, 2005 2GOLD gets the gold star for calling it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MarvinisaLunatic 0 Report post Posted February 4, 2005 The Pay Movie services like HBO are assumed safe, the only beef with Cable is that most basic cable plans include stuff like FX, MTV, etc, and basic cable is essentially the Free over the air TV of the era now. I just wait for them to decide that they need to start cleaning up the internet for the sake of the little kids. You know thats coming next. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2GOLD 0 Report post Posted February 4, 2005 2GOLD gets the gold star for calling it. Dammit, why is it the ONE TIME I'm right it's THIS! They should have hired Reverend Bill, at least he has a sense of humor. Crap. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jobber of the Week 0 Report post Posted February 4, 2005 FUCK. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrRant 0 Report post Posted February 4, 2005 The Pay Movie services like HBO are assumed safe, the only beef with Cable is that most basic cable plans include stuff like FX, MTV, etc, and basic cable is essentially the Free over the air TV of the era now. I just wait for them to decide that they need to start cleaning up the internet for the sake of the little kids. You know thats coming next. Wrong again. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jobber of the Week 0 Report post Posted February 4, 2005 The government, no matter how PTC-friendly, simply can't try and regulate content on cable and satellite networks, because the courts have already stripped them of any ability to do explicitly that. They are the final word on this issue, not the FCC, and not Congress. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites