Guest Dale Earnhardt Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Actually, according to the FCC, there's no actual definition. They say, "I know it when I see it." It's very vague. Pretending to have sex with someone isn't porn, kind of like pretending to fight someone isn't really fighting. Common sense says that if a woman is screaming in orgasm while another woman is between her legs then that would qualify as porn. Softcore porn but still porn. It is sold and marketed as such. And yes, I agree with you Ripper that models pretending to have sex is disrespectful but I look Skinemax is the closest to porn that we have on television. Skinemax was my introduction to porn back when I was a kid. This kind of porn is more of an introduction to porn before people start to get into the real stuff.
Modern Man's Hustle Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 It's not porn, Dale. They're actors....acting. The stuff on "Skinemax" doesn't even come close to porn. Ever seen a lesbian show on Cinemax? You can actually see large gabs in between them while they're "screaming in orgasm". It's acting. Is any love scene in a movie porn to you? Was Halle Berry and Billy Bob Thornton in Monster's Ball porn? Because it's the same equivalent.
Boon Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Why are we arguing what is and what is not porn? What's the point? The moral of the story is that Vince hired chicks who get naked- love it or hate it.
Guest Dale Earnhardt Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 It's not porn, Dale. They're actors....acting. The stuff on "Skinemax" doesn't even come close to porn. Ever seen a lesbian show on Cinemax? You can actually see large gabs in between them while they're "screaming in orgasm". It's acting. Is any love scene in a movie porn to you? Was Halle Berry and Billy Bob Thornton in Monster's Ball porn? Because it's the same equivalent. But it is marketed as such. That's the difference, Skinemax fits the definition of "Softcore Porn" (Softcore shows no penetration). It's not real porn but from a marketing standpoint, it is a form of it.
Modern Man's Hustle Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Really? Softcore shows no penetration? There's no penetration because they're not even coming close to having sex. I don't believe it's a "marketing" standpoint, either. You can't buy stuff they show on Cinemax at a porn store, can you? No? Not pornography. Jesus Christ.
Open the Muggy Gate Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Really? Softcore shows no penetration? There's no penetration because they're not even coming close to having sex. I don't believe it's a "marketing" standpoint, either. You can't buy stuff they show on Cinemax at a porn store, can you? No? Not pornography. Jesus Christ. I've seen lots of scenes where you look at it and go... yeah fucking right they're screwin'. It's all acting. Sidenote: Lord of the G-Strings is the dumbest thing I have ever seen.
Open the Muggy Gate Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Oh yeah... one for the road... NSFW
Modern Man's Hustle Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 OMG U KEN C HER B00BZ ITZ PR0NAGRPHY.
Guest Dale Earnhardt Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Really? Softcore shows no penetration? There's no penetration because they're not even coming close to having sex. I don't believe it's a "marketing" standpoint, either. You can't buy stuff they show on Cinemax at a porn store, can you? No? Not pornography. Jesus Christ. Actually, you can buy the movies that they show in stores. I took a look at my program guide for a random Skinemax movie and searched IMDB and found that they are on sale on DVD. So, they are sold. It's not pornography but it is marketed as such. It's marketed as SOFTCORE porn. Is it horrible? Yes. Okay, that settles it. It is SOFTCORE porn. Hardcore porn is real porn, Softcore porn is a bunch of models pretending to have sex.
Black Lushus Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 who cares...real porn or not, it works in a pinch...
Modern Man's Hustle Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Are you incapable of typing "Cinemax"?
Guest Dale Earnhardt Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Are you incapable of typing "Cinemax"? Skinemax- The adult portion of the Cinemax schedule. Get it? Skinemax. It's a nickname for it so I refer to it as that. Why do you have a problem with it?
Modern Man's Hustle Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Thanks for explaining to me why it's called "SKIN"emax. I've got a nickname for you. It's "Douchebag." From now on, I'll only refer to you as your nickname. Do you have a problem with that?
Guest Dale Earnhardt Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Thanks for explaining to me why it's called "SKIN"emax. I've got a nickname for you. It's "Douchebag." From now on, I'll only refer to you as your nickname. Do you have a problem with that? You're the idiot who started the porn debate. I'm not going to argue with you. I'm not going to allow myself to be dragged down to your level. This is a topic about Amy Weber making out with a chick while naked and it being exposed. Don't troll, you'll have a better life.
2GOLD Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Ok fine, now that it's over....where is the nude Maria pics? Cause Maria and Joy are the only divas I care to see nude. I don't want Trish or Lita nude, then they just become another set of breasts instead of working hard to earn respect for their abilities. Which they both have. Plus I like the air of mystery and imagination I need for them. Maria is hot...that is the full extent of her job in the WWE so I wish to see her nude. It all works in the circle of things that want nudity.
Modern Man's Hustle Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 This is a topic about Amy Weber making out with a chick while naked and it being exposed. Don't troll, you'll have a better life. Classic.
AndrewTS Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 What about that "couples" stuff that often features *real* porn stars, but doesn't really show much? i.e. : http://www.raincoatreviews.com/savr0147.shtml
Modern Man's Hustle Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 The sex includes a blowjob, titty fucking and finger fucking (2 digits) followed by missionary and doggy sex. Colt pulls out and cums on her ass. I think that kinda tells you what it is.
AndrewTS Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 The sex includes a blowjob, titty fucking and finger fucking (2 digits) followed by missionary and doggy sex. Colt pulls out and cums on her ass. I think that kinda tells you what it is. But what was actually shown was barely more explicit than what was featured here. So even if no "good stuff" is shown, but they're actually engaging in sexual acts, it's porn, but if they're "faking" having sex but it *looks* more explicit, it isn't porn? Gotcha.
Nighthawk Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 I think the definition of porn is something you're supposed to jerk off to.
Modern Man's Hustle Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Penetration is what it boils down to.
Nighthawk Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 What about Japanese porn where they blur out penetration?
Art Sandusky Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Are you incapable of typing "Cinemax"? Skinemax- The adult portion of the Cinemax schedule. Get it? Skinemax. It's a nickname for it so I refer to it as that. Why do you have a problem with it? I have a problem with it. Let's take this outside.
AndrewTS Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Penetration is what it boils down to. If it *looks* like there is, but you don't really see anything, though...? Plus, there's plenty of "adult videos" that don't feature penetration. Some lesbian stuff, certain fetish stuff, etc. I like IDRM's definition better.
Modern Man's Hustle Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Then go with his definition. I don't care. Can we agree that Douchebag is wrong in calling that "porn", though?
Guest Dale Earnhardt Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Then go with his definition. I don't care. Can we agree that Douchebag is wrong in calling that "porn", though? I wasn't wrong, as IDRM, porn is something that you are meant to jerk off to and Cinemax porn is meant for that reason. Anyway, now that this troll is gone, back to the topic at hand. Which other diva search girl do you think has some form of pornography floating around?
AndrewTS Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Then go with his definition. I don't care. Can we agree that Douchebag is wrong in calling that "porn", though? Without preceding it with "soft" or "softcore?" Sure. Because it's misleading. "Hardcore porn" is kind of redundant, because people think of "porn" as referring to "real" porn, anyway. What about Japanese porn where they blur out penetration? Another good point. Why the hell hasn't this thread been moved yet?
Modern Man's Hustle Posted February 14, 2005 Report Posted February 14, 2005 Anyway, now that this troll is gone, back to the topic at hand. Which other diva search girl do you think has some form of pornography floating around? Are you fucking shitting me? Do you read what you type before you hit "add reply"? This shit is hilarious.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now