Guest MikeSC Posted February 22, 2005 Report Posted February 22, 2005 NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan defended the United Nations, which is beset by scandals from the Iraqi oil program to sexual abuse by peacekeepers, as "vital to humanity" in the Wall Street Journal on Tuesday. "I have served the U.N. all my life. I have done, and am still doing, everything I can to correct its imperfections, and to improve and strengthen it," he wrote in an opinion piece. "And I believe profoundly in the importance of that task, because a strong U.N. is of vital importance to humanity." Annan addressed charges of mismanagement and corruption in the U.N.'s now-defunct Iraqi oil-for-food program, admitting there were failings while accusing some critics of hyperbole. U.S. lawmakers and an independent inquiry by former U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker have uncovered lax management, a shortage of auditors and procurement irregularities but no crimes. "The interim report of Paul Volcker's independent inquiry has helped put the Oil For Food program in perspective. Some of the more hyperbolic assertions about it have been proven untrue," Annan wrote in the Journal. "Yet I am the first to admit that real and troubling failures -- ethical lapses and lax management -- have been brought to light. I am determined, with the help of member states, to carry through the management reforms which are clearly called for by Mr. Volcker's findings," he said. Annan also addressed the U.N. probes of allegations against peacekeeping soldiers in the Democratic Republic of Congo of sexual exploitation of women and girls. "Both the U.N. Secretariat and the member states have been too slow to realize the extent of this problem, take effective measures to end it, and punish the culprits. But we are now doing so, and I am determined to see it through." Annan said the U.N. had demonstrated its importance both in helping with the Asian tsunami disaster relief effort and the war in Iraq. "The war in Iraq two years ago caused many people on all sides to lose faith in the U.N.," he wrote. But he added: "Precisely because the United Nations did not agree on some earlier actions in Iraq, today it has much needed credibility with, and access to, Iraqi groups who must agree to join in the new political process if peace is to prevail. "The U.N. can be useful because it is seen as independent and impartial. If it ever came to be seen as a mere instrument or prolongation of U.S. foreign policy, it would be worthless to everyone." http://reuters.myway.com/article/20050222/...N-ANNAN-DC.html Yes, the UN is truly vital. I suppose we can centralize all of the thievery and sexual crimes in one big organization. And opposition to Iraq GAVE the UN "legitimacy"? In what alternate universe does Annan reside in? I guess Annan has no problem with the UN being a tool to use against Israel and for Palestine ad infinitum. -=Mike
Vyce Posted February 22, 2005 Report Posted February 22, 2005 I'm amused by the fact that all he can do is argue that the CONCEPT of the U.N. is what's important. It's all he can do because it's glaringly apparent that the U.N. in practice isn't worth shit, and hasn't been for a LONG time.
SuperJerk Posted February 22, 2005 Report Posted February 22, 2005 And opposition to Iraq GAVE the UN "legitimacy"? In what alternate universe does Annan reside in? His argument didn't make any sense to me, either. He seemed to be contradicting himself there.
2GOLD Posted February 22, 2005 Report Posted February 22, 2005 We need to give Kofi a half hour comedy stand up special. Some of the stuff he says is HILARIOUS.
Guest Vitamin X Posted February 22, 2005 Report Posted February 22, 2005 And opposition to Iraq GAVE the UN "legitimacy"? In what alternate universe does Annan reside in? I see what you're saying and it makes sense, but I think what Annan was going for there was in saying that the UN supported peace at all costs. Still rather retarded, though.
Dr. Tom Posted February 22, 2005 Report Posted February 22, 2005 If you have to make a speech telling everyone how great you are, then you're not great. The UN is the pits. Kofi Annan is a chief reason why.
Guest Vitamin X Posted February 22, 2005 Report Posted February 22, 2005 Somewhat off-topic question then, for you all: Who is a better fit to run the UN, if at all?
Slayer Posted February 22, 2005 Report Posted February 22, 2005 If you have to make a speech telling everyone how great you are, then you're not great. (Yes it's not CE, no I don't care, I couldn't resist)
Special K Posted February 22, 2005 Report Posted February 22, 2005 Dennis Kucinich would be a perfect fit for the UN.
Guest MikeSC Posted February 23, 2005 Report Posted February 23, 2005 I think the UN is an unfixable mess. A debating society, which is basically all it is, is of not much use in the world. -=Mike
Jobber of the Week Posted February 23, 2005 Report Posted February 23, 2005 "I have served the U.N. all my life. I have done, and am still doing, everything I can to correct its imperfections, and to improve and strengthen it," he wrote in an opinion piece. Then get out the fuckin' door and leave a little resignation note on your desk.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now