Matt Young 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 Holy shit. That whole 9th inning was an emotional rollercoaster. I had a good feeling when Podsednik stepped up to the plate, and bam... he did it. 2 wins away. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 But it wasn't a foul... so it shouldn't be called one. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bruiser Chong 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 But it wasn't a foul... so it shouldn't be called one. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> If it hits your bat, it's a foul. The replay showed that it went off the barrel of the bat. Do you not understand the rules or something? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 Uh it didn't look that way to me, but if that is really the case, then yeah you'd be right. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mike546 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 The ball clearly hit the bat. Wasn't even close. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slayer 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 I didn't tune into the game until the 9th inning due to the wrestling PPV. What're you debating? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mike546 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 Two runners on, two outs, 3-2 count to Dye. Wheeler throws a pitch up and in that the ump says hit Dyes hand, when it clearly hit the barrel of the bat. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
iggymcfly 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 The ball clearly hit the glove of the catcher. This idea that it hit the bat is a creation of FOX to try to increase ratings for a World Series that the White Sox are dominating. Honestly, you'd have to be retarded or something to think it hit the bat after watching the replay. It was clear as day. The bat came into the screen a full half-second behind the ball hitting the glove and dropping to the ground. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slayer 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 Two runners on, two outs, 3-2 count to Dye. Wheeler throws a pitch up and in that the ump says hit Dyes hand, when it clearly hit the barrel of the bat. Did that preceed the grand slam? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 Yes, Dye was right before Konerko. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
A Happy Medium 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 Well...I think the bottom of the ninth and Podsednik's walk off can be summed up like this. Oh my god. No way. OH MY GOD! *Comiskey Park (US Cellular Field sucks as a name) splooges on itself* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vern Gagne 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 Lidge is Eck 2K5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Conspiracy_Victim 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 The ball clearly hit the glove of the catcher. This idea that it hit the bat is a creation of FOX to try to increase ratings for a World Series that the White Sox are dominating. Honestly, you'd have to be retarded or something to think it hit the bat after watching the replay. It was clear as day. The bat came into the screen a full half-second behind the ball hitting the glove and dropping to the ground. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Bullshit. They showed the side view of the play and the ball never hit Ausmus's glove. It clearly changed direction because it hit the underside of Dye's bat. All the announcers even admitted as such. Dye didn't even head towards first until the ump pointed him down the line. The movement of the ball came from it hitting the bat during the gap between frames in the camera shots. The ball missed Dye's arm by 3 or 4 inches and hit Dye's bat. The umpire, seeing the ball headed in the direction of his face, closed his eyes as a reaction (you can see it after Ausmus's glove moves at the very end of the extreme close up). All the umpire had to go on was the sound of the ball hitting something and his own last impression of the ball riding up and in on the batter. So, he calls it a HBP when it should have been a foul ball. Am I pissed? Hell yeah. But, these plays happen in baseball (see Everett's phantom tag). Umpires' perception of that happened isn't always accurate. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bruiser Chong 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 I'd say that the umps have leaned towards the Sox on just about every questionable call in this entire postseason. Doesn't take away from the fact that they look unstoppable. I just wish the umps wouldn't be so quick to give them every call when it's clear they need none of the help. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Precious Roy 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 I only saw the replay once, the one FOX showed during the game, but it looked to me like the ball clearly hit the bat. I'm not sure how people are seeing it hit Ausmus' glove.... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 I'm not into AIM chats, but I just want to point out that the second half of the inning there was what baseball's all about. None of this try to get somebody on base before you bash the ball over the fence. The Sox got multiple hits, ran the bases, and scored two runs. If everybody played that way, I'd watch a hell of a lot more baseball. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You're a dumbass. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EVIL~! alkeiper 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 No, he's got a point. The "Moneyball" style is probably the most-effective way to win a game, but it is not necessarily the most exciting style. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 I've been brainwashed, what can I say? I can't enjoy ignorance anymore Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 I've been brainwashed, what can I say? I can't enjoy ignorance anymore <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Oh don't worry, you don't have that problem. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Slayer 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 Jim Rome had a good point today "Nobody on the Astros flight home is going to joke about seeing Podsednik's home run outside the plane" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Niggardly King 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 You can all thank my fiancee. She's a good luck charm for the Sox. She called me last Sunday, and minutes later, the Sox won the ALCS. She watched the game with me last night and they won. She called me tonight, and not 30 seconds later, grand slam. Okay, so maybe it's a coincidence, but as long as the Sox win, that's what matters. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vern Gagne 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 I'm not into AIM chats, but I just want to point out that the second half of the inning there was what baseball's all about. None of this try to get somebody on base before you bash the ball over the fence. The Sox got multiple hits, ran the bases, and scored two runs. If everybody played that way, I'd watch a hell of a lot more baseball. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You're a dumbass. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Don't make me break out a picture of Gil Hodges. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Wart Report post Posted October 24, 2005 But it wasn't a foul... so it shouldn't be called one. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Even Jermaine Dye has acknowledged that it went off his bat. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sfaJack 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 But so what if it did? There is no way to know if or how things would have turned out differently if they had called it a foul ball. At full speed, surely you can see how it would be difficult to make the 100% correct call. We all have the gift of multiple replays. Besides, the Astros have played enough sloppy baseball in this Series that a single non-call on that foul ball did not put them down 0-2. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bruiser Chong 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 Yeah, we seem to be overlooking the fact that the White Sox got their first two runs because of lousy Astros defense. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 But it wasn't a foul... so it shouldn't be called one. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Even Jermaine Dye has acknowledged that it went off his bat. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> And I then later said that it didn't look that way to me, but if its the accepted belief, then I'll go along with it. And hey if Dye says so, then it's true. (Nonsarcastic btw) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Czech Republic 0 Report post Posted October 24, 2005 You can all thank my fiancee. She's a good luck charm for the Sox. She called me last Sunday, and minutes later, the Sox won the ALCS. She watched the game with me last night and they won. She called me tonight, and not 30 seconds later, grand slam. Okay, so maybe it's a coincidence, but as long as the Sox win, that's what matters. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ... <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Strong work, Matt Young. You essentially called your girlfriend a troll doll. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sfaJack 0 Report post Posted October 25, 2005 MLB has taken over the decision-making over whether the roof at the Juicebox will be open or closed for the next three games. The Astros are crying loudly about it, too saying that the dome is part of their home-field advantage. While they have a point that MLB might be out of line in suddenly making these decisions (why didn't they do it in the other two series?), I don't see why it matters. I don't think the White Sox will be cowering in fear of the loud Houston fans. The weather is freaking gorgeous here today--why wouldn't they open the roof? I guess this will be the excuse if the Astros lose tonight. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Bruiser Chong 0 Report post Posted October 25, 2005 But it doesn't make sense that they have no issue with it all the way through the regular season and first two rounds of the postseason, and yet, come World Series time, they've suddenly decided to step in. I don't think it makes a difference, but I don't think it could be much more obvious that MLB wants Chicago to win it all. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nl5xsk1 0 Report post Posted October 25, 2005 But it doesn't make sense that they have no issue with it all the way through the regular season and first two rounds of the postseason, and yet, come World Series time, they've suddenly decided to step in. I don't think it makes a difference, but I don't think it could be much more obvious that MLB wants Chicago to win it all. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Ugh ... I absolutely hate it when fans think that a sport is purposely altering the Series to let one team win over another. Maybe baseball is stepping in now because they don't want the World Series games that the whole nation is allegedly watching to be impacted by one team's obvious home field manipulation. Last year in the NFL playoffs, the NFL made the Patriots re-sod their stadium before the game vs. the Colts. Should I have accused the league of wanting the Colts to win?!? Even if the league DID want the White Sox to win it all, wouldn't they at least want the Series to go as long as possible? If anything, they should be rooting Astros now, and then switching back to rooting Sox after the Stros have won a few games. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites