AndrewTS Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 Hooray. The Future of gaming! And no, you can't use your old Dual Shocks. Or PS2 memory cards. Or PS1 memory cards. Wireless controllers are THE FUTURE!
AndrewTS Posted November 20, 2005 Author Report Posted November 20, 2005 You can use your psPod as a controller though, I believe. Yay.
Scroby Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 Someone needs to say "I'm Batman" while holding the controller.
AndrewTS Posted November 20, 2005 Author Report Posted November 20, 2005 I stand by my belief that it will play UMDs.
Guest Leelee Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 Ugh... forcing people to waste money on accessories is the main reason I prefer MS to Sony.
MrRant Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 Someone needs to say "I'm Batman" while holding the controller. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Just look at the picture and sing the 60's "Batman" theme song to yourself. Same effect.
AndrewTS Posted November 20, 2005 Author Report Posted November 20, 2005 Ugh... forcing people to waste money on accessories is the main reason I prefer MS to Sony. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Um...what? 20 bucks for a faceplace? 30 bucks for a lousy remote? 50 bucks for a wireless controller and 40 for a WIRED one?! The seperate hard drive option? How about the bundles--which are getting first priority over reserves that were just the systems?
Guest Smues Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 They're keeping the steering wheel controller of death? boooooo
Anya Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 It might be ok for most games. I'd rather have the boomerang than the Nintendo remote.
Guest Leelee Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 Ugh... forcing people to waste money on accessories is the main reason I prefer MS to Sony. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Um...what? 20 bucks for a faceplace? 30 bucks for a lousy remote? 50 bucks for a wireless controller and 40 for a WIRED one?! The seperate hard drive option? How about the bundles--which are getting first priority over reserves that were just the systems? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes, you're absolutely right on the 360. Rephrase my original comment to XBox1 instead of MS.
Anya Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 MS made you pay for Xbox Live and DVD playback with Xbox 1. Harddrive was nice though.
Use Your Illusion Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 Nintendo is the way, people.
AndrewTS Posted November 20, 2005 Author Report Posted November 20, 2005 Also, X-Box came with 4 controller ports. You had to buy a multitap for PS2, and the old PS1 multitap didn't work.
Anya Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 Plus you had to buy a new PS2 when your old one overheated.
Use Your Illusion Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 What is the word on how many controller ports the PS3 will have?
AndrewTS Posted November 20, 2005 Author Report Posted November 20, 2005 What is the word on how many controller ports the PS3 will have? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Wireless, remember? None. It doesn't support wired ones like XB, thus no use of the PS2/PS1 controllers. However, supposedly up to 7 wireless controllers can be supported by one system. Yeah, odd number, but that's supposedly the correct info for now.
Invictus Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 PS and PS2 memory cards won't work on it? I thought this system was supposed to be backwards compatible with majority of the software? So we have to replay all of those games again just to save them on the PS3 memory card, we can't even transfer them over? What a joke. Also Anya, the Nintendo remote will fit into a "regular" shell controller for things like fighting games, etc. Just wanted to point that out.
Anya Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 Also Anya, the Nintendo remote will fit into a "regular" shell controller for things like fighting games, etc. Just wanted to point that out. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yeah, but that doesn't mean anyone will put any good fighters on the system.
Use Your Illusion Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 What is the word on how many controller ports the PS3 will have? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Wireless, remember? None. It doesn't support wired ones like XB, thus no use of the PS2/PS1 controllers. However, supposedly up to 7 wireless controllers can be supported by one system. Yeah, odd number, but that's supposedly the correct info for now. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> *slaps forehead* Oh, of course. Thanks man.
Lil' Bitch Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 And no, you can't use your old Dual Shocks. Or PS2 memory cards. Or PS1 memory cards. Wow, that's gay. And when I say that, I mean as in really fucking homo.
AndrewTS Posted November 20, 2005 Author Report Posted November 20, 2005 What is the word on how many controller ports the PS3 will have? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Wireless, remember? None. It doesn't support wired ones like XB, thus no use of the PS2/PS1 controllers. However, supposedly up to 7 wireless controllers can be supported by one system. Yeah, odd number, but that's supposedly the correct info for now. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> *slaps forehead* Oh, of course. Thanks man. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Actually, come to think of it I forgot about other options: PlayStation 3 supports numerous forms of portable media. The PlayStation 3 has 6 USB 2.0 ports, a memory stick slot, an SD slot, and, in stark contrast to many of Sony’s other consumer electronics products, the system actually supports compact flash. Sony even saved a space for a removable 2.5” hard drive. http://hardware.gamespot.com/Story-ST-x-1985-x-x-x
Guest Vitamin X Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 Ugh... forcing people to waste money on accessories is the main reason I prefer MS to Sony. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Um...what? 20 bucks for a faceplace? 30 bucks for a lousy remote? 50 bucks for a wireless controller and 40 for a WIRED one?! The seperate hard drive option? How about the bundles--which are getting first priority over reserves that were just the systems? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> She mentioned forcing people. All those things are optional, save for the DVD remote, which I didn't like with either Xbox system. It wasn't lousy either, it worked perfectly fine for me.. I don't see what's so wrong with it other than having to buy the stupid thing. The 360 won't have that problem though, so that's nice.
AndrewTS Posted November 20, 2005 Author Report Posted November 20, 2005 She said accessories, though. Technically, no accessories are really "forced" on you. You only need to buy another controller if you intend to play with friends who don't have the system. Other than that, there are guns and other special sorts of controllers--only "forced" if you want to play the game properly. Wow, that's gay. And when I say that, I mean as in really fucking homo. It's kind of unclear whether it will even play PS1 games, although that's probably not considered too important. "Backward compatible with PS2" is all that's known, but just for the games themselves.
Scroby Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 Microsoft didn't really force you to buy any of there accessories. You could argue about the dvd playback kit but its not really something you NEED to have, unless you don't have a dvd player. Sony on the other hand made you buy a memory card if you wanted to save any of your progress and I'm sorry you can't argue that you didn't ever need a memory card. Plus the multitap, now you don't really need this but being able to play 3 or 4 players is nice, but to buy a extra accessorie so you can play 3 or 4 players is a bit much. Anywho, yes Sony makes you buy there accessories, there's really no argument. Thats why I'm completely anti sony.
Anya Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 Mememory cards and things like that cut costs. At the end of the day you're not getting anything for "free". It's just added to the cost of the system.
AndrewTS Posted November 20, 2005 Author Report Posted November 20, 2005 Okay, forgot about the memory card. You got me there, but that's pretty much the only essential one. Microsoft didn't really add the cost of the hard drive to the cost of the X-Box--they sold it at a loss to establish the X-Box brand. Now they're going to try to cash in a bit more. Sony is merciless on the cost of those "memory sticks" however.
Guest Vitamin X Posted November 20, 2005 Report Posted November 20, 2005 I like Microsoft's strategy though- chances are, there'll be a price drop when the PS3 launches. Sell at a high price during the holiday season, make it the toy all the kids will want, then drop the price when your main competitor launches their console. It's not just the memory card(s), either. Online adapter? Hard drive? Those things were necessary to play games. Aside from the cost of paying for Xbox Live (now a moot point on the 360), all I needed was an extra ethernet cable or wireless adapter to get online, and I didn't need to buy anything for the box to play any of my games (ah, we all remember that one adapter Nintendo sold for the N64, I forgot what it was called but it was necessary to play Perfect Dark... someone refresh my memory?)
AndrewTS Posted November 20, 2005 Author Report Posted November 20, 2005 Expansion Pak. Only a few games used it, though. Hard drive was supported for one or two games for PS2, and the selection of games with online play for PS2 was pretty pitiful. It's not entirely clear if Sony's going to require a separate online adapter, or if they're going to do a core/deluxe thing with a hard drive.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now