Guest • Report post Posted August 4, 2007 Plus, how much tolerance does a national audience have for Mr. Boston? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Smartly Pretty 0 Report post Posted August 4, 2007 Pretty sure ESPN thinks 3/8 of America is Boston. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Prophet of Mike Zagurski 0 Report post Posted August 5, 2007 Another 3/8 is made up of New Yorkers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Smartly Pretty 0 Report post Posted August 5, 2007 The final 8th is Tiger Woods. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dobbs 3K 0 Report post Posted August 5, 2007 Well, technically there would still be 1/8th left, which I believe is Barry Bonds' forehead. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Timmy8271 0 Report post Posted August 6, 2007 Oh man Wilbon sorta ripping Skip Bayless over Tiger woods was great. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
J.B. Buzzkill 0 Report post Posted August 7, 2007 Oh man Wilbon sorta ripping Skip Bayless over Tiger woods was great. Skip is only worth my time when he's ranting on the volleyball scene in Top Gun. Other than that, fuck him. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
devo 0 Report post Posted August 7, 2007 Not entirely ESPN's fault, but those Miller High Life commercials that air on their networks are terrible. "Oh no, please don't take your shitty watered down beer from our upscale markets and restaurants! PLEASE!" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Smues Report post Posted August 7, 2007 Not entirely ESPN's fault, but those Miller High Life commercials that air on their networks are terrible. "Oh no, please don't take your shitty watered down beer from our upscale markets and restaurants! PLEASE!" Amen, I can't stand those ads. "No way we're gonna let OUR beer be sold at nice places, dive bars only!" Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ripper 0 Report post Posted August 7, 2007 someone needs a ball kicking for that "history of mistrust" story on there now. That is complete bullshit being used to make sure the Vick case gets good and racial. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Smues Report post Posted August 7, 2007 someone needs a ball kicking for that "history of mistrust" story on there now. That is complete bullshit being used to make sure the Vick case gets good and racial. What's the story? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ripper 0 Report post Posted August 7, 2007 They have a story talking about all of the civil right atrocities that have happened in atlanta and are trying to link that to the Vick story and why so many blacks are supporting him. Its cheap and its bullshit and it is insulting. Using the 1906 lynchings as the backdrop to a Mike Vick story is bullshit. He is just a fucking QB getting charged with dog fighting. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted August 8, 2007 Is Wilbon narrating it? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MrRant 0 Report post Posted August 8, 2007 Ahh, good old ESPN. Nothing ever happens to someone without them trying to work in the race card. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dobbs 3K 0 Report post Posted August 8, 2007 Well, black people like dog fighting, I guess. Is that what they're trying to prove with that story? ESPN loves the race baiting, for sure. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vern Gagne 0 Report post Posted August 8, 2007 It's that time of year to give 12 year old kids, more coverage than they deserve. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Soriano's Torn Quad Report post Posted August 8, 2007 Still not as shameful as implicitly calling Hank Aaron an Uncle Tom. That was a low they shan't soon pass. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Smues Report post Posted August 8, 2007 Still not as shameful as implicitly calling Hank Aaron an Uncle Tom. That was a low they shan't soon pass. When did they do that? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
J.B. Buzzkill 0 Report post Posted August 8, 2007 Still not as shameful as implicitly calling Hank Aaron an Uncle Tom. That was a low they shan't soon pass. When did they do that? Around the time Hank said he wouldn't be there for the breaking of the record. They didn't come out and SAY he was an Uncle Tom, but the message was obvious. Personally, I don't care about Hank's present day involvement in this at all. If he wants to go golfing, then damnit, let him go golfing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Smues Report post Posted August 8, 2007 Still not as shameful as implicitly calling Hank Aaron an Uncle Tom. That was a low they shan't soon pass. When did they do that? Around the time Hank said he wouldn't be there for the breaking of the record. They didn't come out and SAY he was an Uncle Tom, but the message was obvious. Personally, I don't care about Hank's present day involvement in this at all. If he wants to go golfing, then damnit, let him go golfing. Hank should have been under NO obligation to do anything for Barry's record breaking. It was really nice of him to make that video he made, shows he's a better man than I am, but if he hadn't than whoopity shit. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
USC Wuz Robbed! 0 Report post Posted August 8, 2007 I still think Hank Aaron was on something, so while he didn't HAVE to do shit, it would be highly hypocritical if he did take some kind of PED and then damn Bonds for the same thing. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Soriano's Torn Quad Report post Posted August 8, 2007 Don't forget the "non-scientific poll" they did where they said black people supported Bonds, white people didn't, but white people supported Hank Aaron, and tried to frame that in a most unsavory way, when in reality, it's just that nobody likes Bonds. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vern Gagne 0 Report post Posted August 8, 2007 Hank Aaron is an Uncle Tom. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve J. Rogers 0 Report post Posted August 8, 2007 I still think Hank Aaron was on something, so while he didn't HAVE to do shit, it would be highly hypocritical if he did take some kind of PED and then damn Bonds for the same thing. ??? I'd buy someone like Reggie Jackson being on something, but where is the proof here? I'm not seeing much difference other than the filling out going from 20 to 40 often brings. If you are talking amphetamines and the like, I really can't see how trying to stay awake and focused game after game equates with taking something that will give you a competitive edge in terms of increased skills and power. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
The Man in Blak 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 Aaron admitted in his biography that he tried a greenie once in the middle of a slump, but there's no proof (or even allegations, really) of any prolonged use through his career. There's really no comparison there with Bonds, who has admitted use - please forgive me if I don't buy the explanation that Bonds thought it was "flaxseed oil" - and is alleged to have been a walking medicine cabinet throughout his late career peak. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Vern Gagne 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 Who decided putting quotes from the awful comments section was a good idea. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
J.B. Buzzkill 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 Aaron admitted in his biography that he tried a greenie once in the middle of a slump, but there's no proof (or even allegations, really) of any prolonged use through his career. Read Ball Four sometime. Guys ate greenies like candy back in those days. Getting on Hank for trying them once (allegedly) is a little silly IMO. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve J. Rogers 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 Aaron admitted in his biography that he tried a greenie once in the middle of a slump, but there's no proof (or even allegations, really) of any prolonged use through his career. Read Ball Four sometime. Guys ate greenies like candy back in those days. Getting on Hank for trying them once (allegedly) is a little silly IMO. I was going to say that as well. While they are dangerous, and highly destructive when taken for prolonged periods and in mass quanities, (not to mention illegal narcotics) there is no similarity between them and steroids. Greenies, speed, whatever you want to call them are a much more potent form of caffeine and something to take to improve your awarness and keep you sharp during the long season. Thats why entertainers took them as well because they were doing over 200 shows a year, and sometimes doubling up certain dates. So there is no equating them with someone trying to improve their skills or gain muscle mass with the use of steriods or HGH. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Dobbs 3K 0 Report post Posted August 9, 2007 Someone on ESPN First Take yesterday complaining about Aaron only doing that video and not being there in person made me want to puke. Yeah, I bet ESPN would have loved Aaron to legitimize Bonds' moment so they could elevate him even more, but he didn't have to, so there. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Soriano's Torn Quad Report post Posted August 9, 2007 Well, 79% of America approves of Hank Aaron being the all-time home run leader, so I wonder what that could mean. I said I wonder what that could mean. WHAT COULD IT MEAN. SOMEONE SAY IT I'M BURSTING AT THE SEAMS HERE. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites