nl5xsk1 Posted November 1, 2006 Report Posted November 1, 2006 Since when is being a pain in the ass not a good reason to get rid of somebody? It's a message board, not a friggin' democracy. I never said it had to be a democracy, and that the majority should be allowed to dictate if someone should be banned or not. But there has to be something less arbitrary than "he (or she) is a pain in the ass". Being a pain in the ass is - in and of itself - not a ban-worthy offense.
Art Sandusky Posted November 1, 2006 Report Posted November 1, 2006 But we've done it many, many times before and the are better off for it. Besides, she's pretty much admitted to posting how she does in order to get a rise out of people and there are ALWAYS going to be some dumbasses who respond to that. Remember how it was with WP? Or Crono? All people had to do was ignore them and they'd go away, but it never happened. That's is why you ban people who fall under this, because it'll derail topics whenever the person gets involved. Posting that you're above the kids here and going on and on and on with the same theme is going to get a reaction. She's become a troll now and should go. It's reached the stage where people start shit with her in other folders without provocation. Which is easier, getting everyone to change their behavior, or removing what's causing the behavior? In addition, the catalyst for all of this doesn't make any bones about enjoying it and wanting it to continue.
Guest Paul Posted November 1, 2006 Report Posted November 1, 2006 Paul for President gets my vote. ~!
{''({o..o})''} Posted November 1, 2006 Report Posted November 1, 2006 Only if he brings the gray tracksuit and the little kiddy potty.
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now