NoCalMike 0 Report post Posted March 14, 2007 http://www.worstpreviews.com/review.php?id...section=preview http://www.worstpreviews.com/media.php?id=...p;place=trailer Discuss. I like what I see, thus far. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gary Floyd 0 Report post Posted March 14, 2007 I've already posted that footage, but all well. That does sound great though. Just give it a trailer, and I'll be set. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gary Floyd 0 Report post Posted March 14, 2007 A clip from the trailer is up You'll be able to see the whole thing when Hills Have Eyes II comes out. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NoCalMike 0 Report post Posted March 14, 2007 A clip from the trailer is up You'll be able to see the whole thing when Hills Have Eyes II comes out. THAT is what I thought I was posting. I must have linked the wrong thing....my bad. Thanks for the fix! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dubq 0 Report post Posted March 16, 2007 Interesting. As long as the production values are better (and I don't necessarily mean money here) than Day of the Dead 2: Contagium... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
cd213 0 Report post Posted March 19, 2007 Interesting. As long as the production values are better (and I don't necessarily mean money here) than Day of the Dead 2: Contagium... I think that anything will be better then that piece of crap. It really should not even have Day of the Dead in the title. That's blasphamous to George A. Romero! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkktookmybabyaway 0 Report post Posted March 20, 2007 Day of the Dead 2? Oh good Christ. 28 Days Later was perfectly acceptable. What will be the third installment -- 28 Months Later? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2GOLD 0 Report post Posted March 20, 2007 Day of the Dead 2? Oh good Christ. 28 Days Later was perfectly acceptable. What will be the third installment -- 28 Months Later? Followed by 28 Years Later and 28 Decades Later. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gary Floyd 0 Report post Posted March 20, 2007 Poster is now online Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Jonathon 0 Report post Posted March 21, 2007 That looks awesome. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NoCalMike 0 Report post Posted March 22, 2007 Cool Poster. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gary Floyd 0 Report post Posted March 22, 2007 Someone got to see the first 28 minutes of it and has good things to say. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gary Floyd 0 Report post Posted March 25, 2007 Well, I suffered through "Hills Have Eyes II" last night (really, avoid it) for the trailer, and it does indeed kick ass. When it comes online, either me or someone else will post it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dubq 0 Report post Posted March 26, 2007 Canada (or at least Toronto) got shafted on this trailer. I saw HHE2 last night and there was no 28 Weeks Later trailer attached to it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gary Floyd 0 Report post Posted March 27, 2007 Trailer's now online. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Red Baron 0 Report post Posted March 27, 2007 Looks pretty sweet to me. I liked 28 Days Later. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NoCalMike 0 Report post Posted March 27, 2007 Looks sweet. Seems the tone and atmosphere of the original has been perserved. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dubq 0 Report post Posted March 27, 2007 Fucking sweet! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gary Floyd 0 Report post Posted April 17, 2007 clips (you have to add your name and birthdate to see them) Another Clip International trailer New posters Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Red Baron 0 Report post Posted April 18, 2007 I heart zombie movies. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Obi Chris Kenobi 0 Report post Posted April 18, 2007 lol Muse are being used on as the trailer music, nice. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
UseTheSledgehammerUh 0 Report post Posted April 18, 2007 The little boy and young girl in the movie bother me, as usually little kids in horror flicks = shit. I might wait for the DVD. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dubq 0 Report post Posted April 19, 2007 I heart zombie movies. *awaits this movie is not a zombie movie argument to begin* Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord of The Curry 0 Report post Posted April 19, 2007 Zombies are re-animated dead. These things are infected with a virus. Thus, not a zombie movie. Can't really argue it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dubq 0 Report post Posted April 19, 2007 True. But I've seen people try. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theintensifier 0 Report post Posted April 19, 2007 http://imdb.com/gallery/ss/0463854/Ss/0463...ath_key=0463854 Freaky picture. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lord of The Curry 0 Report post Posted April 19, 2007 Hopefully the amount of infected children increases from the first movie. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theintensifier 0 Report post Posted April 19, 2007 I've always wondered why they don't show very many children in these types of movies, especially zombie flicks like Dawn of the Dead (remake, of course)? I think it'd show more realism, agreed? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Guest Vitamin X Report post Posted April 19, 2007 Zombies are re-animated dead. These things are infected with a virus. Thus, not a zombie movie. Can't really argue it. They die, and they're re-animated by the virus. I can see why there would be an argument. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Corey_Lazarus 0 Report post Posted April 19, 2007 Zombies are re-animated dead. These things are infected with a virus. Thus, not a zombie movie. Can't really argue it. They die, and they're re-animated by the virus. I can see why there would be an argument. TECHNICALLY, a zombie movie is one that focuses on voodoo practices, as a REAL zombie is one that is under the control (via "potions," AKA various herbal drugs and poisons) of a voodoo practitioner, most often as revenge on his/her family or for slavery purposes. So if you wanna get TECHNICAL about it, then everybody's wrong. Plus, the Infected do not die once infected. They get INFECTED and SLOWLY die due to dehydration and starvation (they do not eat nor drink, hence the many dying ones at the end of 28DL), but the infection makes them have incredible rage (hence its name: RAGE) and deny all other aspects of their own life to destroy all living non-infected beings. I see the Infected as a good pseudo-zombie: it has the speed that lesser-core/casual zombie fans like, it's STILL human (the classic line "we're them and they're us" is applied even more to the Infected), and it doesn't want to eat you but merely rip you to pieces. They ARE zombies in the sense that they are driven to do one thing and ignore everything else to achieve that one primal goal. Romero zombies, and most zombies in films, just want to eat. The Infected want to destroy. They ARE zombies, but they aren't because what constitutes a zombie has been forever changed by George A. Romero and John Russo. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
