Jump to content
TSM Forums
Sign in to follow this  
TheShooter

Interesting article about Bonds arm gear

Recommended Posts

From http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/ne...t_id=1003621797

 

---------------

 

NEW YORK (Commentary) Beyond his alleged steroid use, Barry Bonds is guilty of the use of something that confers extraordinarily unfair mechanical advantage: the “armor” that he wears on his right elbow. Amid the press frenzy over Bonds’ unnatural bulk, the true role of the object on his right arm has simply gone unnoticed.

 

This is unfortunate, because by my estimate, Bonds’ front arm “armor” may have contributed no fewer than 75 to 100 home runs to his already steroid-questionable total.

 

Bonds tied Henry Aaron’s home run record of 755 on Saturday night and will go for the new standard this week back at home in San Francisco. As a student of baseball – and currently a mechanics consultant to a major league baseball team -- I believe I have insight into the Bonds "achievement." I have studied his swing countless times on video and examined the mechanical gear closely through photographs.

 

For years, sportswriters remarked that his massive "protective" gear – unequaled in all of baseball -- permits Bonds to lean over the plate without fear of being hit by a pitch. Thus situated, Bonds can handle the outside pitch (where most pitchers live) unusually well. This is unfair advantage enough, but no longer controversial. However, it is only one of at least seven (largely unexplored) advantages conferred by the apparatus.

 

The other six:

 

1) The apparatus is hinged at the elbow. It is a literal "hitting machine" that allows Bonds to release his front arm on the same plane during every swing. It largely accounts for the seemingly magical consistency of every Bonds stroke.

 

2) The apparatus locks at the elbow when the lead arm is fully elongated because of a small flap at the top of the bottom section that fits into a groove in the bottom of the top section. The locked arm forms a rigid front arm fulcrum that allows extraordinary, maximally efficient explosion of the levers of Bonds' wrists. Bonds hands are quicker than those of average hitters because of his mechanical "assistant."

 

3) When Bonds swings, the weight of the apparatus helps to seal his inner upper arm to his torso at impact. Thus "connected," he automatically hits the ball with the weight of his entire body - not just his arms - as average hitters ("extending") tend to do.

 

4) Bonds has performed less well in Home Run Derbies than one might expect because he has no excuse to wear a "protector" facing a batting practice pitcher. As he tires, his front arm elbow tends to lift and he swings under the ball, producing towering pop flies or topspin liners that stay in the park. When the apparatus is worn, its weight keeps his elbow down and he drives the ball with backspin.

 

5) Bonds enjoys quicker access to the inside pitch than average hitters because his "assistant" - counter-intuitively - allows him to turn more rapidly. Everyone understands that skaters accelerate their spins by pulling their arms into their torsos, closer to their axes of rotation. When Bonds is confronted with an inside pitch, he spins like a skater because his upper front arm is "assistant"-sealed tightly against the side of his chest.

 

6) At impact, Bonds has additional mass (the weight of his "assistant") not available to the average hitter. The combined weight of "assistant" and bat is probably equal to the weight of the lumber wielded by Babe Ruth but with more manageable weight distribution.

 

Bonds has worn some sort of front arm protection since 1992. In '94, a one-piece forearm guard was replaced by a jointed, two piece elbow model. In ‘95 it got bigger and a small "cap" on the elbow was replaced by a "flap" that overlapped the upper piece and locked the two pieces together when the arm was elongated. In '96, the "apparatus" grew even larger and so did the "flap."

 

It seems to have remained relatively the same until -- interestingly— 2001, the year of his record 73 home runs, when an advanced model appeared made (apparently) of a new material. It had softer edges and a groove for the flap to slip into automatically at full arm elongation. More important, the upper half of the machine was sculpted to conform more comfortably to the contours of Bonds' upper arm. Since 2001, the apparatus seems to have remained relatively unchanged.

 

Several years back, baseball was rightfully scandalized by the revelation that Sammy Sosa had "corked" his bat. The advantages conferred by the Bonds "hitting machine," however, far exceed anything supplied by cork. Ultimately, it appears the Bonds "achievement” must be regarded as partly the product of “double duplicity" -- steroidal and mechanical.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The tone of the article is absurd, but I don't think it's too much of a stretch to say that Bonds enjoys a competitive advantage with the body armor that other players don't have. (The rules on body armor have change to prevent others from using a similar type of arm brace, but Bonds was somehow grandfathered into the policy by MLB.)

 

You won't catch me asserting that 75-100 home runs are directly attributable to "the apparatus", but to deny that it doesn't have an impact on the way pitchers approach him seems a bit naive to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Number six, Bonds hits the ball harder because his arm is heavier due to the elbowpad? Number one regards the hinges. It's not like your elbow itself has a myriad of directions it can turn.

 

That aside because I'm not a mechanical mind, this is really nit-picking. 50-100 home runs? Is there ANY factual basis to that claim? The elbow-guard is allowed by Major League Baseball. Maybe it shouldn't be, but there is nothing preventing Bonds from wearing it. The only thing you can claim is that it allows Bonds (or any hitter) to stand in without worry.

 

In any case, to use it to cast doubt on Bonds' achievement is silly. Babe Ruth used a corked bat sometime in the early 20s. If you want to cast doubt on Bonds because of the pad, you have to do the same to Ruth's record as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see anything wrong with guys wearing elbow pads and such for protection, but to let a guy wear full on body armor that's probably tougher than what our guys in Iraq are wearing just seems stupid to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Tzar Lysergic

I'd throw at his face to get him to back up, but then again that's why I could never play baseball. I'd be a goon pitcher.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I actually read on Deadspin this morning that the arm measurement that this is made for hasn't changed since the guy began making it for Bonds. Meaning, in effect, that his arm has been the exact same size for 10+ years.

 

Now, I don't think I believe that. But that's what I read.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'd throw at his face to get him to back up, but then again that's why I could never play baseball. I'd be a goon pitcher.

 

I certainly wouldn't be offended if a pitcher did that in baseball today, but that's far from the established view, for whatever reason. One theory is that the advent of free agency in baseball has deterred from very "competitive" behavior like this, due to the potential likelihood of one day being on the same team as the guy that you almost cracked in the head with a 90 mph fastball.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

If the guy wants to wear armor so some lousy pitcher can't try to plug him instead of being a man and pitch to him then go for it. Maybe the real reason pitchers have given up so many homers is they started overthinking cause he got bigger. Instead of just going after him and seeing what happens, a lot of them tried to pitch carefully and would usually hang one.

 

Should have did a Willis to him his whole career. That "here is my best pitchers, see what you can do" theory of attack. I like that when pitchers stop dicking around and just bring it on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×